Lucius

Of course I would care if there was a terrorist attack on Danish soil. You should have gathered as much by now. It's an important part of morality to stand up for what is wrong, regardless of whom those wrongs affect. Funny how you get all hot and bothered about Iraq being occupied, but you don't care about civvies being blown to pieces in terrorist attacks. Funny. That's funny, too, as the UN is nothing but a lobby, where those who have the power gather to put the pressure on those who don't, under a veil of diplomacy and concordia. Sorry to break it to you, but the UN are a farce, pal. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually I probably would care if any western nation was hit again, but I blame my outbursts here on lack of sleep and being slightly drunk from earlier. Can I retire now with the whip marks on my back?

Because we all know how effective those are. Put some "soldiers" who've never seen combat in a ditch with a Swiss Army knife and a blue hat, and make damn sure they're aware that no matter what happens, they can't do anything. Wait, I just figured out why you approve of those. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Good, took you long enough for sure.

I actually don't care, do you care if someone is murdered in Denmark? If you should care about every friggin' nasty thing in the world, you wouldn't have time for anything else. I do care for UN sanctioned peacekeeping missions, but I don't want anything to do with US led vendettas.

No, I have no problem with people having different opinions, as long as they are able to back them up. Newsflash: "Bite Me" isn't worth jack as an argument. With Hades is different as I don't really care about his stance, I just point out to the fundamental flaw in his approach. I'm arguing from a factual perspective with him. With you, however, it's different. You don't care if innocent people are slaughtered, as long as they don't make a mess in your backyard. That is morally wrong. It's an interesting contradiction, as you accuse others of the same hipocrisy you can be faulted with. You see, I argue. Like mommy and daddy, does that ring a bell? You, on the other hand, "can't be bothered", and throw out preteen retorts. Keep it up, "man". <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't say that, I said terrorists wasn't my concern. I don't want us to engage in US led missions against these terrorists whom they (the US) have pissed off themselves in the first place, in my opinion. UN peacekeeping missions is something entirely different, even the otherwise neutral Swedes do that. EDIT: And talk about insulting and making outrageous assumptions, you don't know jack **** about me, yet you spill your bile all over the place anyway.

I'll take that to heart, if you can take to heart that what you meant as only slightly provoking might be a bit more than that, especially considering our past disputes. And I never claimed I wasn't a hypocrite.

Let it go, I don't care what it says. Edit: This is edit hell.

What continent are you on again?

Yeah. It sure sucks to have one's arguments blown to pieces, eh? It's no wonder you fly off the handle so easily. The frustration derived from being proven wrong again and again must be unbearable. Dont worry, I feel for you. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Make a toast or not, I don't give a ****. Especially since most people know Dutch soldiers doesn't come from Denmark. As for the rest of your bile, I really can't be bothered. You have a problem with my stance (and that of Hades, obviously) and you simply can't cope with others having different views than you. Your problem, not mine.

What were you expecting, honestly? You know how to push my buttons and so you do it. Don't tell me you didn't intend to provoke me.

Arrogant? Most certainly. However, you fail to understand that it's precisely the arrogance of the dominating power of the moment (be it the US or the Roman Empire) that insures the stability you live so well off. I guess unintentional hypocrisy isn't completely to blame on the hypocrite, but it's hypocrisy all the same. I'm not sure what you mean by this statement, but I'm going to grant you the benefit of doubt and assume you are referring to the supposedly adverse effect that taking an active role in the ME has in terrorism. If that is what you mean, then you are just wrong. Because the alternative is assuming you mean that if terrorists don't bother you, you don't bother 'em, in which case you would be not only a dummy, but a yellow-bellied coward as well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Whatever you like numbersdear, whatever you like.

You want to piss me off, you succeded, congrats kn

Oh it would be a freaking blast, I envy the Swedes for never entering NATO. And suddenly sense of common decency is equal to USA? Please.

That you folks have pissed off the Middle East is most certainly not my problem or that of my country or region. I don't care if you lost relatives in terrorists attacks, it's simply not my problem. I'd rather we weren't allies at all. That is what I advocate. And various posters including the name KOTOR; bite me.

Because of that attitude right there, arrogant yankee bull****... isn't it obvious? Besides, terrorists haven't done anything to my country or region. And pray tell, why the hell should they?

Shut your burger eating pie hole and do some research before you put forth your bile, please. Oh and kiddo, "bjork" is Icelandic... Go back to your corner now and read that old fairy tale book of yours.

Oh I forgot, going to the doctor isn't free over there. (I actually did forget, this isn't scorn)

Go see the ****ing doctor already.

Nah, we're just in a different age now. You can't behave like that anymore. I'm sorry but you're simply just outta luck, you should have had your time to shine a few centuries ago instead if you wanted to act all warmongering like. Ohhh that's right, you didn't exist back then. By the way, BW and Commie ought to get a friggin' room, this is ****ing hot!

Oh I agree, that thing is friggin' laughable.

Denmark made an equally sucky SMG, one of the few weapons we've made the past century. (I wonder why ) the infamolus... unholy... Madsen

Noooooo, really? To be fair, you would probably put Marvin to shame.

Intriguing.

No pr0n Mus? I'm disappointed.

It amuses me that you swe folks decided to name these weapons "AK", so whenever someone asks "Avtomat Kalashnikov?" you respond "No Automatisk Karabin ffs, why so hard to understand?!111"... or that was the response I got at any rate. :D

or "phallus" *awaits reaction* This smily " ) " drives me crazy by the way.