Gamasutra interviews Feargie

[Zoma]

Very interesting. You get an insight how an indepedent developer works. At least in Feargie's point of view.

 

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4044...iew_.php?page=1

 

But you're working on Alpha Protocol.

 

FU: Oh absolutely, yeah. So, we continue to work on Alpha Protocol, and it's actually going great. I'm actually pretty excited from the standpoint of, you know, we hit content complete, so we shoved all the -- I'm not going to call it crap -- we got everything in the game, and now we're just working towards alpha.

 

In essence, we get to polish a number of months before alpha, and then a number of months to beta, so it's looking really positive. We've been able to fix a lot of things. As a developer, there were a lot of things we had to learn with Alpha Protocol, things we didn't have to do in our previous games. And so, we've been really hitting those things.

Edited June 5, 2009 by Zoma

[Enoch]

Advice to Feargus: Don't do any more in-person interviews for print media unless they're going to give you the opportunity to edit your transcribed responses for clarity. It was an interesting read, but figuring out what he was trying to say through the haze of fast-talking grammatic license was a struggle.

[Gorth]

You can almost hear him talking very, very fast

 

now that there are a couple games that we're looking at starting right now

One is probably FO:NV, but "couple" implies more than one?... *initiate speculashun*

[Humodour]

You can almost hear him talking very, very fast

 

now that there are a couple games that we're looking at starting right now

One is probably FO:NV, but "couple" implies more than one?... *initiate speculashun*

 

He doesn't mean FO:NV (though I know they're working on that, too).

 

Edit: or maybe he does considering the date of the interview.

Edited June 6, 2009 by Krezack