kirottu Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Linky. Good read basicly. Anybody who rather makes games than being Zeus of the skies(just without lightnings) is ok in me book. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Diamond Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 For NWN2 the rendering engine is completely new...written from scratch. What this means is that there was a lot of work to do in a relatively short amount of time. "Rushed development cycle" doesn't sound too good to me. <_< I'd rather prefer a delayed but good game rather than a half-assed game on time.
Atreides Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Thanks for the link Spreading beauty with my katana.
kirottu Posted November 14, 2005 Author Posted November 14, 2005 For NWN2 the rendering engine is completely new...written from scratch. What this means is that there was a lot of work to do in a relatively short amount of time. "Rushed development cycle" doesn't sound too good to me. <_< I'd rather prefer a delayed but good game rather than a half-assed game on time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No one have said "rushed developement cycle". Honestly, having 2 years of time doesn This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Diamond Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 For NWN2 the rendering engine is completely new...written from scratch. What this means is that there was a lot of work to do in a relatively short amount of time. "Rushed development cycle" doesn't sound too good to me. <_< I'd rather prefer a delayed but good game rather than a half-assed game on time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No one have said "rushed developement cycle". Honestly, having 2 years of time doesn
Kaftan Barlast Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Damn! The toolkit sounds like a dream come true ) I cant wait to get my hands on it DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Diamond Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 I like tinting/scaling creatures feature. It is simple, yet adds value to the game.
kirottu Posted November 14, 2005 Author Posted November 14, 2005 For NWN2 the rendering engine is completely new...written from scratch. What this means is that there was a lot of work to do in a relatively short amount of time. "Rushed development cycle" doesn't sound too good to me. <_< I'd rather prefer a delayed but good game rather than a half-assed game on time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No one have said "rushed developement cycle". Honestly, having 2 years of time doesn This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Diamond Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 It is the case when they reuse some old engine, they have a tested codebase. To code something from scratch means to spend more time on development and testing. BTW Brian mentions that they decided to ditch old graphics engine, because it was unmaintainable, the result of Bioware writing it from scratch and later rushing the development cycle. I really hope it will not be the same with NWN2.
kirottu Posted November 14, 2005 Author Posted November 14, 2005 It is the case when they reuse some old engine, they have a tested codebase. To code something from scratch means to spend more time on development and testing. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Graphics and tools were written from scratch, but not the whole engine. Very rare gaming companies can afford to spend more than two years on single game. BTWBrian mentions that they decided to ditch old graphics engine, because it was unmaintainable, the result of Bioware writing it from scratch and later rushing the development cycle. I really hope it will not be the same with NWN2. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 3D graphic engines become old in matter of years and due the long developement cycle of nwn the aurora engine wasn This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Ellester Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Brian mentions that they decided to ditch old graphics engine, because it was unmaintainable, the result of Bioware writing it from scratch and later rushing the development cycle. I really hope it will not be the same with NWN2. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Jeeze, I can Life is like a clam. Years of filtering crap then some bastard cracks you open and scrapes you into its damned mouth, end of story. - Steven Erikson
Volourn Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Huh? Won't argue too much about DS; but MW's graphics are horrible. Brown poo on my screen does not equal good graphics. period. MW had horrid graphics. I darn near puked. And, 2 year sor so for NWN2 isn't bad since they didn't start the graphics from scratch. That's a myth. Just becuase you update the graphics engine, slap a new name on it; doesn't make it a brand new engine. It makes it an updated engine. BIG difference. Also, as has been noted by Feargus himself, NWN2's devlopment time is about in line with BG2. And, I doubt too many people will try to make a lame argument that BG2 was 'rushed'. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
alanschu Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 In that link Brian Lawson says that the graphics/rendering engine is "new....made from scratch."
J.E. Sawyer Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 It's pretty interesting how Anthony Davis can tell you flat out that zero of Aurora's rendering code still exists in Electron and you maintain that it's an update. In physical terms, that would be the equivalent of removing an engine from a car, putting a new one from a different manufacturer in, and saying it's an updated engine instead of a new one. twitter tyme
Morgoth Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 And, 2 year sor so for NWN2 isn't bad since they didn't start the graphics from scratch. That's a myth. Just becuase you update the graphics engine, slap a new name on it; doesn't make it a brand new engine. It makes it an updated engine. BIG difference. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They did, and that was mentioned several times by Brian & Co. NWN2's renderer is based on DX9 technology whereas NWN1 is OpenGL based, so Obsidian had to rebuild the renderer completely from scratch.... As a side note, it's actually impressive to see what they were able to do so far with NWN2, especially the graphics and the completely new toolset which seems to work already at the current status pretty well... Looking at the DA forums, you still only get "We've not decided yet what the toolset will look like" crap. Those Biowarians are just too slow. Rain makes everything better.
alanschu Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 And, 2 year sor so for NWN2 isn't bad since they didn't start the graphics from scratch. That's a myth. Just becuase you update the graphics engine, slap a new name on it; doesn't make it a brand new engine. It makes it an updated engine. BIG difference. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They did, and that was mentioned several times by Brian & Co. NWN2's renderer is based on DX9 technology whereas NWN1 is OpenGL based, so Obsidian had to rebuild the renderer completely from scratch.... As a side note, it's actually impressive to see what they were able to do so far with NWN2, especially the graphics and the completely new toolset which seems to work already at the current status pretty well... Looking at the DA forums, you still only get "We've not decided yet what the toolset will look like" crap. Those Biowarians are just too slow. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> To be fair, I think Dragon's Age is still a long ways away. Though a guy from Bioware did mention at my school that they've made decisions on their pathfinding model, as well as the scripting language! :D
Volourn Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 "It's pretty interesting how Anthony Davis can tell you flat out that zero of Aurora's rendering code still exists in Electron and you maintain that it's an update. In physical terms, that would be the equivalent of removing an engine from a car, putting a new one from a different manufacturer in, and saying it's an updated engine instead of a new one." I've been told flat out that the world is flat. I'm not going accept that is fact either. Sorry. Anyways, I'm not going argue with a dev over this. Last thing i want is to be banned for arguing with a dev on their boards about their game. You win by default. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
mkreku Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 You win by default. You lose by stupidity. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
J.E. Sawyer Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 Volourn, what do you know about Electron, or about graphics programming in general, that leads you to believe that Anthony and Brian are lying? Because really, that's what you're doing; you're calling them liars. twitter tyme
Volourn Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 (edited) "You lose by stupidity" You lose by reportation for flaming. "Volourn, what do you know about Electron, or about graphics programming in general, that leads you to believe that Anthony and Brian are lying? Because really, that's what you're doing; you're calling them liars." I'm not going to argue with you on this. I'm, however, gonna point out that I'm not calling them liars. It's just my definition of "new engine" is obviously different than theirs is all. From what i've seen and heard, the Aurora has been updated with better graphics (no doubt that about this); but the core Aurora is still what is powering the game just with changes. It's kinda of the same situation as with KOTOR. BIO updated it; gave it a new name, and called it a brand new engine. And, there's a lot more differences in KOTOR's engine comapred to NWN's than, say, NWN vs. NWN2. At best, imo, one could say that that the grpahics engine is vastly updated that I'd be willing to say it has a new graphics engine. But, that's all. Edited November 14, 2005 by Volourn DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
mkreku Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 "You lose by stupidity" You lose by reportation for flaming. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You just called a developer a liar. That's been reported too! See you in court! ) Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Volourn Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 "You just called a developer a liar." I didn't accuse anyone of lying. Having a different view on thinsg doens't make the other person a liar. And, I'm the one oftena ccused of seeing things in black and white. " That's been reported too! See you in court! " Cool. However, your sin is obvious. Stuipid I may be or not; but being stupid is not against the forum rules. Flaming is. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
J.E. Sawyer Posted November 14, 2005 Posted November 14, 2005 It's kinda of the same situation as with KOTOR. BIO updated it; gave it a new name, and gave it a new name. And, there's a lot more differences in KOTOR's engine comapred to NWN's than, say, NWN vs. NWN2. At best, imo, one could say that that the grpahics engine is vastly updated that I'd be willing to say it has a new graphics engine. But, that's all. Okay. You may want to go back and edit your post where you wrote, "And, 2 year sor so for NWN2 isn't bad since they didn't start the graphics from scratch. That's a myth." In fact, that is precisely what Brian did. No one is saying that the scripting language and underlying game logic is different. twitter tyme
kirottu Posted November 14, 2005 Author Posted November 14, 2005 Volourn, you could have worded out better what you said right from the start. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now