Whitemithrandir Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 Well, parlaying the function of effectiveness versus attack and defense, set defense as a function of attack, substitute in and solve for maximum... the result comes to be about... they're both equally important. Word economics To express my vast wisdom I speak in haiku's.
ged Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 Given the choice between perfect defence and perfect offence perfect defence is more important, if no one can touch you, you cant be killed, on the other hand if you can kill someone with one hit then you can still be killed yourself with just a shot to the head.
Daaave Posted August 9, 2004 Posted August 9, 2004 offense. Kill the b*****s before they can touch you Just because you're a bit thinner than your even fatter mum it doesn't mean you're in excellent physical shape, if you could fit through the door and view the normal people you'd notice that cheeseburger boy. Squid suck.
Leferd Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Ever been in a fight? You're in much better shape if you have your opponent on the defensive. The key to a good defense is anticipation. Attack before your opponent completes his attack. "Things are funny...are comedic, because they mix the real with the absurd." - Buzz Aldrin."P-O-T-A-T-O-E" - Dan Quayle
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now