May 11, 200520 yr I understand the evolutionists' examples of animals adapting to the environment, but don't see how organisms could grow parts such as major organs or limbs over several generations. "Who could blame Skynet? He's such a cute, innocent, steel-bolted robot." -Gauntlet
May 11, 200520 yr Statement: It appears that many of the organic meatbags in this thread are unwilling to accept their true nature, prefering the illusion of being special or unique. They think that their meatbag status is due to some divine decree. Conclusion: It's time to show these meatbags how wrong they are, by putting an end to their hosility permanently. Robot Pope, prepare the Machine Crusade!
May 11, 200520 yr I understand the evolutionists' examples of animals adapting to the environment, but don't see how organisms could grow parts such as major organs or limbs over several generations. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Look at our appendix. It serves no purpose, but evidence suggests that thousands of years ago, it did. It makes sense that if our bodies will slowly phase out obsolete organs, why wouldn't they grow new useful ones? And one common misconception that creationists often make is that evolution suggests that one species gives birth to another, which doesn't happen. What happens is the living animals adapt to their environment and pass those adaptions on to the next generation over thousands of years. The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity.
Create an account or sign in to comment