Darth Tratious Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 check this out a 512 MB thats right 512Mb graphics card http://gear.ign.com/articles/610/610111p1.html
Rosbjerg Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 awesome ... awesome to the max! Fortune favors the bald.
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 I've always thought Nvidia would be the first...I belive they have compability for 512 on the 6800 series
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 nVidia g70 is teh future yo. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What is it? Linky?
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Isnt running 2x256 on sli a similar thing? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't think so...as SLI is still 2 cards Tho I'm not sure if 512 will increse the performsnce much...Isn't frequency more important?
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 More memory allows it to store more textures and therefore render faster. But there's no game out there that will try to push more than 256mb DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 More memory allows it to store more textures and therefore render faster. But there's no game out there that will try to push more than 256mb <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree tho the difference in most games seems to be made due to the frequency and not the memory Oblivion and G3 seem like 512 MB games "
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Neg. Unreal3 may be a 512mb game. Oblivion and Gothic3 are doing the old "fool the public by DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Well I'm sure you're better at this then me :"> I've only seen some trailers of Unreal3 but it looks great.. Maybe NWN2 will be good looking too
mkreku Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Neg. Unreal3 may be a 512mb game. Oblivion and Gothic3 are doing the old "fool the public by Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Baley Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 All of our info(so far) is based on videos and screenshots I belive he consideres Unreal 3 to have more detailed textures and so to require more memory
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 6, 2005 Posted May 6, 2005 Come to think of it, given the nature of bump/normal/displacement mapping, Im not shure wether it relies more on GPU clock for realtime lighting or if its Memory heavy to store the textures.. or both. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Child of Flame Posted May 7, 2005 Posted May 7, 2005 There's been 512 Meg Graphics Cards on the market for awhile now. However they weren't geared for gaming, but for rendering, not sure where this one's going... <edit> That's a better price tag than I've ever seen on a 512 Meg card though. </edit>
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now