mkreku Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 http://pc.ign.com/articles/583/583911p1.html Ign reviewed Cops 2170: The Power of Law, another turn based RPG from a russian developer. They are really building up a very, very bad reputation in the gaming industry.. Also, STALKER got delayed again. Bummer. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 Ouch. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
mEtaLL1x Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 They are really building up a very, very bad reputation in the gaming industry Well, first of all, post-soviet game industry is too weak right now. Only recently there have been some serious progress. But still, the progress is good: http://rpgvault.ign.com/articles/579/579421p1.html here you can find a good review of post-apoc... erm... soviet game industry from western perspective.
NeverwinterKnight Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 that review makes the game sound incredibly disappointing. too bad. i was actually looking forward to this game.
mEtaLL1x Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 Well, I recommend looking forward to Phase: The Exodus. I think it'll be a pretty good PA game... And of course STALKER.
Llyranor Posted February 3, 2005 Posted February 3, 2005 From the makers of Jagged Alliance 3 ;_; (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)
kumquatq3 Posted February 4, 2005 Posted February 4, 2005 A THREE FROM IGN? Did one of the devs on the game kill the ign company dog or something?
Darque Posted February 4, 2005 Posted February 4, 2005 Reader reviews average out to an 8... Maybe IGN is biased?
mEtaLL1x Posted February 4, 2005 Posted February 4, 2005 They prolly have a prejudice against post-soviet devs....
NeverwinterKnight Posted February 4, 2005 Posted February 4, 2005 Reader reviews average out to an 8... Maybe IGN is biased? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> a gaming review website biased? no way! "
Aponez Posted February 4, 2005 Posted February 4, 2005 Reader reviews average out to an 8... Maybe IGN is biased? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Or maybe they gave the game to a man who didn't like the game PRIUS FLAMMIS COMBUSTA QUAM ARMIS NUMANCIA VICTA
jaguars4ever Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Possible Gamepsot ratings: 4.0-4.9: "Poor" Games that just don't work right and maybe didn't spend enough time in production tend to fall into this category. They simply lack the cohesion and quality that make other games fun. 3.0-3.9: "Bad" You probably shouldn't get too close to a game in this range. Any of its positive qualities most likely serves only to make the rest of it seem even more disappointing. 2.0-2.9: "Terrible" Beware. A game within this range is almost entirely devoid of any effective or fully functional features. 1.0-1.9: "Abysmal" Ouch. The rare game that falls in this lowest of the low ranges has no redeeming qualities at all. Don't play this game. Bets anyone? ^_^
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Or it may just be crap like he says. It's quite likely given that most games from that area are flawed in some way and if it's being judged on the same scale as a big production it's not going to score highly anyway. Givev this one a whirl. http://eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=57000 I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now