They were not honest in IGN interview

[vX1nf1d3lXv]

They said in the IGN interview they are answering EVERY SINGLE POST and they are not. There are so many great suggestions and ideas that they say they want all the feedback and response from the community, and they are not responding. Furthermore Grounded 2 has waaaaaaay less in early access than the first grounded had early on. We the community are basically building the game for them like they have no ideas and direction. I don't mind this, more games should be influenced by the consumer/player community (it actually used to in the golden ages of gaming), But stop going out there being dishonest for one there are many of us who said and agree it feels empty and less than the first grounded, and you are not responding to the community or their suggestions. Your only responding to plain compliments that come with nothing extra, seems a little narcissistic and shady. All that's new is riding an insect to go nowhere and do almost nothing. After seeing that dude LIE in that interview that all they're receiving is positive feedback and that they are responding to everyone is soo untrue. Patterns have proven when they start lying like that the product quality gets further and further away from the desired product as well as the time in which it is completed. 

[Greg H]

Who hurt you?

[Dinner_Rollz]

Everybody

[Matt__AsA__Hatter]

I made a few attempts to give feedback.  Got 0 responses too.  The game is heading in a direction I'm not excited for.  Tons of changes were made, and many of them are downgrades, and it doesnt seem like they care.  It's a bit depressing, made me lose my hype for the game.  And I'm nearing 1000 hours in the first one now, the sequel was something I'd dreamed about for a while.  But not like this, not like this.

[NukeGoose]

6 hours ago, Matt__AsA__Hatter said:

I made a few attempts to give feedback.  Got 0 responses too.  The game is heading in a direction I'm not excited for.  Tons of changes were made, and many of them are downgrades, and it doesnt seem like they care.  It's a bit depressing, made me lose my hype for the game.  And I'm nearing 1000 hours in the first one now, the sequel was something I'd dreamed about for a while.  But not like this, not like this.

i wont hate on your attempt to give feedback, but knowing that this game is in early access what aspects that cant be tweaked are worse? sure the omni tool can be a bit frustrating to get used to, but thats now 4 items not in your inventory, 3 if you only ever pulled wrench out when stuff broke. buggys are truly awesome, even if they are a little, well, buggy. but again its early access. sure the catepillars have spikes but dont deal thorns damage, i can logic arround that depending on the weapon. is the resource analyzer a little buggy too? sure but now i can change it without having to go to a lab/tent and it shows spawns of resources. the main thing i can think of thats worse is the overall stats. some things hit harder than expected, but ive been playing with 9* armor sets for the last while and there are still plenty of kinks to work out in the damage vs armor vs buff area of the game.

i guess what im saying is i truly dont see "Many" things that are worse than grounded 1 keeping in mind that this is early access/development. you make it sound like we are in arachnophobia mode with all models and its a finished project comparatively.