Dereth Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 I think it's pretty stupid that duel wielding applied to using two swords/lightsabers AND a double bladed sword/lightsaber. I mean I'm no sword fighter or anything but I'd imagine that wielding two swords would be very different than wielding a bladed staff. They're two completely different fighting techniques. I think the double bladed weapons should have their own feat.
EnderAndrew Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 If there was also a feat to dual-wield, then yes.
PSYCHOKILLER Posted June 10, 2004 Posted June 10, 2004 lets not get carried away with the duel-wield here people
Dereth Posted June 10, 2004 Author Posted June 10, 2004 I don't see how this is getting carried away. You'd only have three styles of fighting. Single weapon Duel Wield Double Bladed
sniggy Posted June 10, 2004 Posted June 10, 2004 + form feats! FORM FEATS! FORM FE- *smack* uh... where am i? It's very hard to be polite if you're a cat.
Adria Teksuni Posted June 11, 2004 Posted June 11, 2004 LOL I always saw the double-bladed weaponry as belonging to a staff type of feat class, but, by the same notion, two-handed fighting is two handed fighting, and for simplification of gameplay, I can see why they did it the way they did it. Never assume malice when stupidity is to blame.
Quiquag Posted June 11, 2004 Posted June 11, 2004 For both the staff and dual sabers you need to use two hands. So they decided to name the feat that allows you to use a weapon needing two hands "dual weapon feat". All that matters is they both require to hands to use....if you look closely the feat has to do with holding two blasters as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now