Mihura

No, that is not an explanation actually. There are theories like people have sex face to faces and things like that but no prove. And you can be gender-fluid and trans, so that makes no sense. And we are affect by scent and pheromones actually. Let us not go there, since "realism" is out of question so is "science". Although I do not agree with what the dev said I really tried of repeating the same thing countless times in a lot of places, and why this is important to some people. I would like to have a more immersive armor but there is so many times a person can take the same thing over and over.

In the end I just want the freedom to create a character that fits my vision of a warrior in the world. I want to have options. Is that so bad? It not even about realism, i mean magic and all that, is more about immersion, that is why a codpiece would be the equivalent to boob armor. It is not really realistic if you exaggerated the form but at least that way everyone is equal. I would like no boob or codpeace armor at all but I doubt at this point they will change that. Ah well.

You mean a careto? As for the armors well to bad than. I just hope the plate version stays that way. At lest we have the options to choose certain armors without boob plate, right?

That picture is from the Wikipedia, I was showing the armor. I played a bosmer actually in Skyrim. Either way I never said it was sexist. Actually to be sexist it would need to treat all genders included on game, differently. If they do a codpiece thing I am more than fine with it, just do not like gender indicators only on one of the sides. I do not understand why they are "realistic" on the plate armor and not on this. I also love the barbarian female armor on Diablo 3, so no I am not against unrealistic armor. I just hate the argument for having it "if females has no boobs on armor how do I know it is a female", it implies that male is the default and females have to have something to identify them. Even when it makes no sense with the other armors. Personally I dislike boob armor but if they are for everyone and all gender get the same degree of it, I would be more fine with it. Also I am not against boob armor if they give you the option to choose to have it or not, like different variants, that way I can just ignore it in game. I do not like to be forced to use it that is all.

I am a man and I know very well how boobs work, your point being? Yeah it doesn't work like that, but then what does in games? So, we are going to draw the line at boobs, because some flatchested girls are having a hissy fit about big boobs showing and their white knights are running to their rescue? Should we also exclude girls from fighter classes, because there is no way that a normal woman can carry plate male, a large ass sword, whatever is in her inventory and still hope to do any damage, because we already capped her strength attribute and it's much lower then that of the male counterpart. We should also put a penalty on crafting, because women didn't do that stuff in the old ages, they don't even do it that much in modern times. But no, we draw the line at boobs, because that is obviously going to far. Well here is the thing, games are not made just for you, nor should they be. You know so much that you even say that flat chest and a bigger chest works differently on armor. Sorry to disappoint but is basically the same, unless of course there is no space in the upper body armor, like a kinda of catsuit. What about the guys that want to have a large codpiece? are they gonna to be ignore too. How to I know a character is a male if they have a small codpiece? They are probably all women with flat chest!

What is even more funny is seeing you people crusade on the forum, because boobs are showing under a armor. I don't know what is more pathetic, the "ban bossy" campaign or the ban boobs in games campaign. It is as pathetic as talking about combat or any other thing in the game, how lucky of you to have the luxury of ignoring this... ah wait. As for me I dislike profoundly any boob armor that makes no sense. In clothes is other story, you can have as much cleavage as you want, if the male version does the same thing. This is a thing that always plague the games I played, as a women knowing very well how boobs work it is almost hilarious and awful how people just get a pass at it because, "omg if I do not see boobs how call a tell it is a women?." this is problematic even on gender complexity. It is more like if you can tell from the armor, there is probably something wrong and they are not boobs at all. I really hope they change the armor to something less obvious and more practical.

The scale armor for woman could be better, there is to much form on the boobs, I would like to see less of that. Maybe a more curvy front in relation to the male version. I mean you guys did great on the plate one, why not this too.

I agree that they should leave boob armor in hell. I would prefer only a slight difference in the torso, unless it is only clothes. A question for someone that knows, they didn't do the boob plate armor right? I mean this is a great example.

I hope so I always hated the way the skills on the player stay on the character even on cutscene, also I always found it way to slow. As for the skills in general it was nice, even how you could combine skills and made new effects.