-
Posts
3981 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by sorophx
-
-
1 hour ago, Hurlshot said:
That ship kind of sailed when Bethesda took Fallout 3 and made it into a massive hit.
these two things don't necessarily have direct causality. of course, we can't know for sure whether or not the name "Fallout" was the main reason behind its success, but I am of the opinion that ultimately it was the game itself and not the brand. I'm certain it would've done equally as well if it had been called RAGE back then and was set in RAGE's universe.
Fallout 3 is not a Fallout game, it's a post-apocalyptic game that takes a few of the cosmetic elements from the previous Fallout games. which is exactly what's happening now with BG3.
-
guys, this isn't the thread for "TB vs RTWP" posts. both are flawed and should never be used for anything other than nostalgia-driven projects.
but the real issue is, BG was RTWP no matter how you spin it. this new game has no business being titled "Baldur's Gate" if it's not RTWP. secondly, the Bhaal spawn saga is over, this game shouldn't have a "3" in its title.
shoulda called it "Pool of Radiance" and be done with it.
- 1
- 1
-
oh hey, is it time to post RDO pics again?
that I am, because I've been making new friends
- 2
-
my unpopular opinion is, DayZ is the most important game of the decade
and I agree with about 60% of what's been said in this thread
- 1
-
oh hey, a RDR2-off!
I'm mostly making new friends online thoughI've sure come a long way since my daring escape
but I do stop to admire the scenery every chance I get
oh, in case anyone was curious, this is the inspiration for my character
- 2
- 2
-
oh Sadie, you always know what to say
- 4
-
Rockstar's shtick with meta-commenting on their silent protagonist in GTA Online always felt a bit weird, glad they brought it over into Red Dead Online...
...NOT
- 1
- 1
-
I never thought I'd write this on a public forum, but my game of the decade is Red Dead Redemption 2 (best RPG since Fallout New Vegas, and yes it's an RPG, although not in the traditional sense).
I don't want to go into spoilers, but the amount of choice and consequences in RDR2 is staggering. but it's also a very beautiful game. but it's also a very detailed world. I love everything about it, even the detailed animations. it's like a love child between The Witcher 3 and DayZ, I can't praise it enough. at 17 USD on the Epic Store it's a steal.
- 2
-
only lv 5 dudes and already huge monsters during missions?
I'm already level 4 on most guys in my squad, I don't want to face that thing yet, still playing with starting weapons, because research is too damn slow -
isn't Rockstar releasing it on their dedicated launcher?
-
such an interesting concept! and the music is nice too- 2
-
I guess, T3 thralls are significantly less powerful than their T4 counterparts, maybe that's why the Arena Champion felt like a wuss to me (she died in less than 30 seconds). I have two Treasure Seekers from the Unnamed City, one with the Annihilator, the other - with Sword of Crom. they shred everything in their path. made my Annihilator dude solo the Red Dragon and the Giant Snake in the Unnamed City today. snake got him down to 60% with its venom, but that was the closes I ever got to worrying. the Red Dragon wasn't even a challenge.
I'm actually thinking of starting the game with a new character and getting through everything without thralls or pets. because otherwise the game basically plays itself. -
On 8/11/2019 at 4:01 AM, marelooke said:
Fighting this boss without cheese is a pretty sure-fire way to get killed. One hit takes off around 40% of my health as her attacks ignore armor entirely... This also means that having a thrall fight her is a really bad idea as she'd just rip through them.
not on official servers, though. a Tier 4 bearer has 9900 HP, Relic Hunter Treasure Seekers have around 7500 HP. you put a good set of armor on them, and they become invincible. I have yet to encounter a boss that can kill a Hunter in full Silent Legion armor. this dungeon was very easy for me, I didn't even have to kill anyone, my thrall wiped them all out (including the bone dragon and the shaleback king).
in my experience thralls break the game completely, even the lower tier ones (named minibosses that have 1800 HP) are so OP at the start of the game, that it made me feel like playing an NPC to someone else's hero. and then there are pets that you don't even need to capture, just find pups/cubs (greater hyenas have 8000 HP and do around 100 damage), that can rip bosses apart.
a bunch of obligatory pics:
- 2
-
6 hours ago, Keyrock said:
^ I have corrupted another one...
I'm happy to be corrupted
I do really like Conan. And I only bought it thanks to your mentioning it had a solo mode. It plays like an Elder Scrolls game, but in a more interesting world. And the thralls mechanic puts it way above similar games. The whole survival-building-fighting cycle is very interesting, in many ways similar to Mount & Blade, and I find myself struggling to step away from the game every time I play it.
And it looks nice.
I am already working on my castle. So far - on the population that will support my future conquests- 1
-
Caved and got Conan Exiles, encouraged by the pics in this thread
Still quite a ways to go, but I'm optimistic
First sandstorm went well.- 3
-
apparently, from one of Sven's interviews. but I can't find the source, so it could be fake. I saw several people quote it, assumed it was real, but couldn't be bothered to read all of the interviews to check for the source
-
Quote
Those were great games for their time (baldur's gate, icewind etc), but next year is 2020 and you can’t do the same things you did back then. No one would want to play it. Well, people would want to play it, but it wouldn’t meet the expectations of a modern video game
ugh... hard pass
- 1
- 2
-
the only way BG 3 would work for me is if it retconned Throne of Bhaal and at the same time was bigger in scope than BG 2.
alternatively, it would be the Black Hound but as big as BG 2.everything else would be BG 3 in name only!
-
I don't know, maybe I'm not getting something, but my understanding is: Epic is covering those 10 bucks off of every purchase. because the games I bought all have two listed prices: developer's price and Epic's price below, where it says Epic gives you 10 USD back for every purchase over 14.99.
so the game's actual price stays the same, but Epic just refunds you for a part of it.unless you guys have info on Epic doing it at the devs' expense, I don't see what the whole "Epic is bad" is about
-
the only reason is the focus on multiplayer
- 2
-
SkillUp is so obnoxious. Terrible reviewer, even worse writer. Can't watch anything with him talking.
-
looks like a prettier version of Darkwind
-
this is one of those instances where I'll happily buy a game on Steam during a sale, just so that Steam gets the cut that would go to the owner(s) of the dev company otherwise
-
Baldur's Gate 3 - the 2nd thread
in Computer and Console
Posted
Original Sin 2 has a good story? are you on crack? that's one of the blandest games ever story wise... I guess now I know why Larian's games are so popular. people can't tell a good story from a bad one, too many games, too much time spent playing mediocre crap, harder and harder to separate the good from the bad, I guess, in this sea of mediocrity.