DDvil

You are using outdated definitions so it fits your purpose. If someone/a company is pressured or it is demanded for them to change their art or product, "or else" it is considered censorship, because they were forced to change or not release their art in it's integrity. Censorship and a regime do not need each other to happen. And weirdos? You can barely write proper English, let alone articulate your stance of the subject, you have no moral to call anyone a weirdo. That's why films go through a review and labeling process before they are launched, that is "censorship" in a way, a great example is 30 shades of grey, who has a new "censored" version. Forms of censorship>censorship, get it right next time, before you get schooled again kid. " Of course, what is GamerGate but screaming into the wind about a cause you've already landed on the losing side of?" Let me see, proved breach of ethics, the journo pro list, proved collision VS Cry babies on twitter who believe in the patriarchy, that "white cis-het males" do not have the right to speak about women & their problems, yet their solo purpose in life is to talk about men. The same people who have been proved to be lying about their threats, location at the time of their treats, and other things which I have no time to talk about. Losing side, how is the vast majority of gamers on the losing side, because there's 6k people crying on Ghazi? Spare me.

Oh god, why did I read this horrible thread? It's nothing but gamergaters and people trying to defend a dumb limerick as artistic integrity. Are you actually serious? This doesn't at all represent me. My goal in backing this project was not "I want a studio I love to make something that offends SJWs". And that quote. Jesus Christ man, that quote. You know if the limerick referred to laser guns and sci fi stuff you'd have no problem with it being changed, but the moment someone gets offended, it's the death of liberty to actually listen to them. This entire situation is still messed up though - who is the change for? It's not for the GGers because apparently the most important thing to them is that this game contains content that offends minorities. It's not for the people who were actually offended because it's obviously a dig against them. Third time's the charm, right? You spelled "she" wrong. And last time I saw gators talk about Thompson they were saying how great a guy he really was. I know logically consistent arguments aren't gg's strong suit, but really. Sincerely, a backer who made Pillars of Eternity possible. Unlike you mr. sockpuppet. All these new accounts wihtout backer status coming out of the woodworks suddenly trying to give extra weight to a ****ty position ... typical gg "tactics". Sure you did, now show me evidence of Gators saying he's a great guy, typical SJW tactics, making claims they cannot back up. Do you even know what sockpuppet means? You clearly don't, go look the definition of that, just because someone made a new account on the forumm so they can debate the issue does not make them a soc-puppet anymore than all the cry babies crying "oh, won't you think about the women who get offended about pretty much anything" who have never bough or played the game, hell, they don't even play games. "All these new accounts wihtout backer status coming out of the woodworks suddenly trying to give extra weight to a ****ty position ... typical gg "tactics"." Extra weight? The majority of backers on the forum are in favor of keeping it up, only two people are against, thats~at least a 10 - 2 ratio... Funny how you dismiss other people's opinions because "they haven't backed the project", yet, this was changed because of people who don't even play games to begin with. This is the "opposition", bunch of people who can't defend their position without assuming things, acting like hypocrites and strait up lying about things that never happened. > I deem this offensive, change it or else I won't play your game, that I haven't backed, played or will ever play, because I'm not even a gamer

The vocal population were present in that debate. I, for example, have an opinion regarding the issue, but chose not to share it. I highly doubt the forum objectively represents the 'overwhelming majority'. LOL, by debate you mean a bunch of special snowflakes who not only haven't played this game before, but are not gamers themselves, people who their whole life purpose is to be offended by words, sounds and images? And spare me, SJWs never debated anyone, all they do is block people. There has been numerous of "calls" for debates, and they all backed back, because they are cowards. That was not a debate, all it was, was people shouting thei frustrations and inssecurities to the world, like they always do. "I highly doubt the forum objectively represents the 'overwhelming majority'." The forum represents the backers and people who played the game, not a small minority of people who got offended by a stupid joke, that wasn't offensive to begin with. You can spin this is, it ends the same way.