jodo kast 5 Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 I wouldve thought so, if he didn't try to prevent Malak from bombing Taris. I mean, he already destroyed the innocent people on Telos without any hesitation, so why would he try to prevent Taris destruction? It doesn't make sense. Thoughts?
Dark Wastl Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 Well, he needed to destroy Telos or the Sith wouldn't have accepted him. Telos was at least partly a military target, there were Republican ships present. Taris was not, it was under Sith control and they were having quite a few soldiers down there. It is one thing to attack a world, it is something completely different to destroy one which you already control.
DAWUSS Posted November 10, 2006 Posted November 10, 2006 I wouldve thought so, if he didn't try to prevent Malak from bombing Taris. I mean, he already destroyed the innocent people on Telos without any hesitation, so why would he try to prevent Taris destruction? It doesn't make sense. Thoughts? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He did have some hesitations, IIRC DAWUSS Dawes ain't too bright. Hitting rock bottom is when you leave 2 tickets on the dash of your car, leave it unlocked hoping someone will steal them & when you come back, there are 4 tickets on your dashboard.
vaxen83 Posted November 10, 2006 Posted November 10, 2006 Maybe of the two, Taris' destruction would have been intense by quite a bit. By the time Telos is seen in K2, it is in state of recovery somewhat, so there is a bit of time difference if thinking of lull period between Revan's departure for unknown regions and Exile's return to rim where planets Peragus and Telos are. Since purpose of attacking Taris was to try eliminating Bastila and friends on planet, fire would be more focused. Deep from within... Victims live a life of fantasy. Some see salvation as an act of God, a few look within for it. 朱宣澧
JediMasterAltena Posted November 10, 2006 Posted November 10, 2006 I tihnk Saul didn't see the necessety in wiping out Tarnis only to find a few people, after all he destroyed Telos as a Show of Loyality to the Sith. But there was really no reason to destroy Ternis at all. only Malak's impaitence. Jedi Master Altena Windwalker Pub 9 Elder Jedi, Star Wars Galaxies: Nurf of the Jedi "We are oft to blame in this--'tis too much proved. --that with devotion's visage and pious action...we do suger o'er the devil himself. " - V "Spelling errors in my post, oh noes! I'm Japanese and English is not primery language plus I'm dyslexic.
jodo kast 5 Posted November 11, 2006 Author Posted November 11, 2006 (edited) Well, he needed to destroy Telos or the Sith wouldn't have accepted him. Telos was at least partly a military target, there were Republican ships present. Taris was not, it was under Sith control and they were having quite a few soldiers down there. It is one thing to attack a world, it is something completely different to destroy one which you already control. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1. Where does it say this? Source please. 2. No. Telos was defenseless. Even Carth says so; "Saul commanded that the planet surrender. The planet refused, and he proceeded to devastate the planet(Or surface.) and there wasn't a damn thing we could do about it." The only time the Rep ships got there was after it got bombed, and that was to rescue any survivors from the assault, that weren't picked up by the Sith. 3. What can we say? Malak was nothing but an impatient, power hungry fool. Edited November 11, 2006 by jodo kast 5
Calax Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 Saul is was just making a point with Telos... Join or Die. Taris was following orders. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now