angshuman Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Short article, and somewhat limited in scope (only one benchmark), but a good read nonetheless. At this point in time, this is probably the only benchmark that allows a fair apples-to-apples comparison of system performance with or without a PhysX. I'm starting to believe even more that in a lot of games, the additional polygons generated by the PhysX screws up the graphics system. http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2828 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionavar Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Yeah I saw this article too. I personally feel that what the PhysX anomaly will do will either push mobo/cpu designers to integrate or video cards to add on. The PC is moving, imo, toward tighter integration, not more add-ons. so, my prediction, the PhysX longevity lies in exhibiting enough performance increase that: a) someone buys them out to integrate (a la Voodoo), or; b) one of the big corps takes the ideas an creates their own integrated model. the fact is that, imo, bang for the buck comes with either a better GPU or CPU. The good thing is that this a tech that will push innovation, just not ultimately as a stand alone item ... or so I think The universe is change; your life is what our thoughts make it - Marcus Aurelius (161) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 Yeah, I think both those scenarios are equally likely at this point: Intel or AMD-ATi licencing their own "DX" PhysX integration chip, to contrast with their vanilla "SX" CPUs ( OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 DX was the integration of the Math coprocessor wasn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 :D yeah, the 486 AND the 487 together! (Does that show my age?) I am qualified to sell them! :D OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted September 8, 2006 Share Posted September 8, 2006 I remember the good old days when FPUs didn't just come on processors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fionavar Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 But a math coprocessor would be different than a PPU - or is the reference to parallel that something similar has been done previously? The universe is change; your life is what our thoughts make it - Marcus Aurelius (161) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 Well, IIRC Math Co-Processors used to be available via add on cards. Now they're just right on the chip. It's possible that something physics related could make its way on, especially if stuff like video technology is making its way on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaftan Barlast Posted September 9, 2006 Share Posted September 9, 2006 I remember getting a math processor for my 386 33 mHz SX. It was just a chip you put in a socket that was already there on the motherboard DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Then you were able to add and subtract like crazy huh Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.ce846aae50e732dc4985eb712252381f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now