Ludozee Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Great stuff here, Kaftan. I like the style of the China one Can you make some nice politically incorrect 50ies style one? You know, the same style fallout uses That would be cool =)
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 19, 2005 Author Posted April 19, 2005 That's difficult, all the good material has been hoarded by SA monkeys. My latest sig, a salutation of Swedish public service television starring top news achors Katarina Sandstr DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
draakh_kimera Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 I dont know, I made it for Rosbjerg. But if he doesnt want it then shure, just ask him. But you hav to host it yourself, Im only paying for my own bandwidth. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Damn, can't be bothered with the hassle of hosting crap. Looks like I'm screwed. Like usual. That SVT sig is more random than outrageous, maybe you could change the program list or something.
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 19, 2005 Author Posted April 19, 2005 Outrageousness is what everyone likes, but random absurdity is really nice too. I was going to make one to celebrate the contruction of V DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
FaramirK Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 What I really want to know, Kaftan, is the origin/backstory of your avatar. It has intrigued me from day one...there is something dark about that little girl. Its like I'm looking through a key hole, and can only see a tiny part of what is going on, yet I know that there is a mass of activity in that peice of art work...
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 22, 2005 Author Posted April 22, 2005 Its Lucy from the childrens book "The Wolves in the Walls" by Neil Gaiman and Dave McKean. Its absolutely breathtaking, every single page is a 50000$ work of fine art. McKean is a true painter on par with Picasso, Van Gogh, Magritte all of em, absolutely bloody brilliant. The story is very nice to, makes you all happy and fuzzy warm inside. http://www.gaimanmckeanbooks.co.uk/wolves.htm I advise everyone to buy it immediatly, kids or no. ANYTHING by Gaiman+McKean is brilliant but this is my favorite. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Roger the Sith Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 That expression on Mao's face... it shall haunt me forever. I think society is to blame here.
FaramirK Posted April 25, 2005 Posted April 25, 2005 Its Lucy from the childrens book "The Wolves in the Walls" by Neil Gaiman and Dave McKean. Its absolutely breathtaking, every single page is a 50000$ work of fine art. McKean is a true painter on par with Picasso, Van Gogh, Magritte all of em, absolutely bloody brilliant. The story is very nice to, makes you all happy and fuzzy warm inside. http://www.gaimanmckeanbooks.co.uk/wolves.htm I advise everyone to buy it immediatly, kids or no. ANYTHING by Gaiman+McKean is brilliant but this is my favorite. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's fascinating the difference between her apperance in your avatar, and her apperance close up. Looks like a different girl...
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 25, 2005 Author Posted April 25, 2005 Thats a pretty common effect, or whatever to call it, when you have scanned paintings and change the size of them. I think its because the brain has certain "identification points" with faces, and when you change the size some of them arent visible anymore and so the brain doesnt recognize it as the same motive. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now