Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Need to revise Constitution and Resolve attributes

Attribute Balancing

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1
Hoo

Hoo

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 83 posts

I'd like to discuss about the current attribute system, because the system is a little unbalanced, especially in the case of Constitution and Resolve.

 

Generally, Offensive/Active stats are considered as being more attractive, because those stats are effective for every characters; either Damage Dealer or Tanker. For example, Might is very effective, may be OP, for every characters, even if for Tanker, since the character even may attack nearby enemies via Disengagement Attack. 

 

On the other hand, Defensive/Passive stats seems a bit less valuable, because those stats do not affect until the character who got the stats is attacked by enemies; the defensive stats even need to be valid against the attacker's attack type! Deflection is only against physical melee/ranged attack, Fortitude is only against internal physical systems like Disease, Poison, etc., and so on.

 

 

Every Attributes, except the two, have at least more than one offensive and defensive stats, respectively. The two Attributes, thus, need to be revised indeed, by either adding a new offensive stat or intercepting some stat from the other Attribute(s). In my opinion, reducing recovery penalty from armor might be a good option for Constitution, I have no idea for Resolve yet though.

 

Any comments and suggestions would really be welcome! 







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Attribute, Balancing

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users