I have voted yes.
Same concerns as so many before on this thread - more content is fine but absolutely NOT at a cost to existing planned content (although this doesnt seem to be a worry from most comments I have seen).
I'm more interested in increased reactivity of companions than the number of them.
Adding more is great, as long as the additional companions also have a good level of depth to them (and again, as long as this is not at the expense of depth to existing companions).
Additional wilderness can be fun as long as there is a reasonable level of content density to explore. For me the focus should be on expanded possiblities to explore the world, history and lore - ie interesting things to discover and explore... not necessarily anything mission critical or particularly beneficial in terms of character power etc, as a wilderness should theoretically be optional.
As a side issue (apologies if this has been discussed.. I read through several pages, but not all) - how would these additional stretch goals be funded?
Will it be "X amount for first additional companion, Y amount for first additional wilderness", and alternating between the two?
or will companions be funded separately from wildernesses (to let people vote for their priorities with their money)
Would this be purely fundraising?
is it going to be funded with the backer management portal? (and if so, are any new rewards going to be introduced to incentivise backing the goals? or will it just be the existing kickstarter rewards?
For my part, I'm happy to back more, but I also dont see anything in the current rewards above and beyond what I have already backed that particularly interests me (except possibly the expansion pack... but thats just a $20 addon, and different rewards might be able to tempt me out of more money).
