Jump to content

Arouet

Members
  • Posts

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Arouet

  1.  

     

     

     

    No. No "but"s. He was dishonest with paying customers, potential customers and funders. Period.

     

    I never accused Firedorn of lying, only Obsidian.

     

    Obsidian's response in that letter was nothing but a **** you to the above and emboldenment to the kill all men crowd (as can be seen with how Eric bragged about it on Twitter and immediantly started thinking about how if everyone were so gullable he'd be throwing men in concnertation camps already)

     

    Yes, Feargus was probably a tad dishonest with you, but:

     

     

    We don't actually know what "vetting" entails.

     

     

     

     

    Please..... the story that this one backer somehow escaped vetting is a lie to cover this ruse. They clearly were pressured by the LGTB lobby to change this text.

     

     

    Im telling you..... all the developers laughed when they first read this text.... NONE found it offensive.... its why it was in the game

     

     

    I recall one of the devs in a PoE sit-down/demonstration sounding quite effeminate. If I were to suspect anything it would be that they have LGBT sympathizers from within also pushing this. - conspiracy theory.

     

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

     

    Next you'll be insinuating they spoke with a "gay lisp".

  2.  

     

    One way or another, Obsidian has lost value with me. How could I ever defend them from their reputation as a buggy developer when, even if they were 100% truthful

     

    1: They had super sloppy vetting process (I'd really like to see the guidelines it went by released publicly)

    2: A genocide advocat on Twitter gets more attention than the many remaining critical bugs

     

     

    Listen to yourself dude.

     

    #1 is essentially "they did not censor enough."  Weren't you JUST throwing a fit there was censorship at all?

    #2 Sawyer gave attention to a different party entirely. Sawyer never directly responded to anything the genodice advocate said.

     

     

    No, it's "they didn't even bother to censor consistently".

    Eric and Cheong both advocate genocide and those are the only two people Sawyer @ed. Either way he listened to one.

     

    Eric's not even her deadname. You are fooling noone. Try KiA, they'd upvote your **** to the ceiling.

  3.  

     

     

    Firedorn knew it was offensive. He expected it to be rejected. He obviously did not intend it as just a harmless jest.

    Why the hell are you so invested in making it seem like he is without fault?

     

    I knew it was offensive.  It was meant as a joke, you know...an offensive one.  What fault is there in expressing myself with something controversial?

     

    Knock yourself out, but you better not be whining if someone expresses themselves by calling it out.

     

    Calling it out is quite different from attempting to extinguish it. It's fine to disagree with questionable content but to call for it to be cut out... well, that speaks of great immaturity.

     

    So you're ok with speech you disagree with so long as it's impotent. Persuasion = censorship. Of course. Of course.

  4.  

    Firedorn knew it was offensive. He expected it to be rejected. He obviously did not intend it as just a harmless jest.

    Why the hell are you so invested in making it seem like he is without fault?

     

    I knew it was offensive.  It was meant as a joke, you know...an offensive one.  What fault is there in expressing myself with something controversial?

     

    Knock yourself out, but you better not be whining if someone expresses themselves by calling it out.

    • Like 1
  5.  

     

    Well, if Firedorn asserts that he had a choice, contrary to what the "worked wth many of our backers to iterate on content that didn't strike the right tone" statement implies, then I'm not going to call that a lie.

     

    I still find Obsidian's post on it bizarre and heavily implying that they would have forced a change.

    You know how PR works... it generally make things worse when the truth isn't as bad as it seems. Sometimes not bothering about "What will people think if I say this? ... and what if I say that instead?" can make everything go smoother. Obsidian isn't perfect, but that doesn't make them terrible people either.

     

     

    The thing is, if they are willing to bend over for this, it also reflects on their integrity in other areas... like development.

     

    There are already big threads pointing out some fundamental flaws in the rule set, as well as some funky decisions with their art style. So this is just another highlight with something internally wrong imo.

     

    Game is still impressive though :)

     

    If SJWs had that power, trust me, wizards would be a lot more powerful.

  6.  

    BTW a few people tried to use Erika's deadname. It's not actually Eric. That's pretty lazy of you.

    If you're going to be a bigot and blow your whole case to hell put some more effort into it.

     

    I dont know if you noticed it but they are using it to insult this person because they are upset. Just like she wants to kill all men because she is frustrated and upset.

    You think she's a terrible person, and yet it's ok that their actions are morally equivalent.
  7.  

    Yay, caving in to the demands of those that most likely didn't even buy the game.

     

     

    Oh it's much worse. It's caving in to the demands of a twitter tranny who likes to to tweet disgusting genocidal fantasies. Yet zealously expects others to live by a strict moral standard he would never, not even for a split second, apply to himself. I mean the thought would just never register.

    Totes not rabidly transphobic.

     

    Actual bigots: go ahead and admit it like this guy has so we can move on with the substance.

  8.  

     

     

    I'm not sure wether to laugh or cry when I see people using the "SJW" acronym. For one, it only shows how fast people are to grab on to propaganda. Secondly, it makes me wonder if they ever consider how much ****tier their lives would be without this horrible horrible concept known as social justice.

     

     

    "Social Justice" began as the name of an anti-semite publication in the 1920s US. Coming from a family with no shortage of Jewish ancestors, I can say my life would be a lot better without it.

    That's a bald faced lie. It was first used by a Jesuit during the 1848 revolutions.

    And it's not the only bald faced lie being thrown around in this thread.

     

    So it's actually associated with the violent and chaotic "reign of terror" where people were murdered daily for mere association, birth or opinion? Much better!

    That's the French Revolution. Lol.
  9.  

    I'm not sure wether to laugh or cry when I see people using the "SJW" acronym. For one, it only shows how fast people are to grab on to propaganda. Secondly, it makes me wonder if they ever consider how much ****tier their lives would be without this horrible horrible concept known as social justice.

     

     

    "Social Justice" began as the name of an anti-semite publication in the 1920s US. Coming from a family with no shortage of Jewish ancestors, I can say my life would be a lot better without it.

    That's a bald faced lie. It was first used by a Jesuit during the 1848 revolutions.

     

    And it's not the only bald faced lie being thrown around in this thread.

  10.  

    Would would really be amazing would be if all the armchair activists here could direct all of the "courage" they've displayed today to a real issue, like the **** that goes down routinely in Washington. The world would really be a better place if this fire showed up when it actually mattered.

    That would be great if it wasn't a fallacy of relative privation.  How can we hope to stop the corruption in Washington if we can't even sort out videogames, hm?

     

    You're right! Why did we try to oppose the bailouts by pressuring congress when we should have focused on VIDEOGAMES?

  11. Okay, so now it's time for me to boycott Obsidian and warn everyone about their practises for foreseeable future. I just can't stand this industry succumbing to outrage and losing it's artistic integrity.

    What would it take to stop the boycott? Do a dozen transwomen have to be killed in a game, so that Obsidian can show they're serious about not being "censored"?

×
×
  • Create New...