-
Posts
95 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by vattghern
-
-
I think you're projecting and you should take your own advice. I never implied the world did. I've been saying it's Obsidian's choice and that they're not fans of them and it's pretty obvious they're pretty bad in general. You're just upset because you might not be getting your romances. There's always DA3. And if you can't wait for that, you can fire up the Witcher and look at your sex cards.o
Not all Obsidian games and they were bad in those too. And they probably had to include them because publishers wanted them.you are a sad little man. all the obsidian games had romance in them, why is it so outrageous to assume that this one will as well?
h the evil publisher is at fault when a game has features i dont like, nevermind all the other fans that appreciate said feature and the devs who felt they wanted to include it
you need to realize that the world doesnt revolve around yourself
unlike you im not campaigning for the exclusion of features that a good portion (majority if this poll is to believed) of the fanbase enjoys because i personally hate them
the presence of romances (which is really only a subset of npc relations - do you dislike all of them?) doesnt affect you if you chose to ignore them, yet you want to deprive others of the pleasure. that is a sad attitude
-
o
Not all Obsidian games and they were bad in those too. And they probably had to include them because publishers wanted them.you are a sad little man. all the obsidian games had romance in them, why is it so outrageous to assume that this one will as well?
h the evil publisher is at fault when a game has features i dont like, nevermind all the other fans that appreciate said feature and the devs who felt they wanted to include it
you need to realize that the world doesnt revolve around yourself
- 1
-
you are a sad little man. all the obsidian games had romance in them, why is it so outrageous to assume that this one will as well?
-
This doesn't even make any sense. I play RPGs where I kill monsters because I can't kill humans in the army? Are you serious?This is a RPG. Not a sex/social simulator for deviants who can't build a relationship in real life.So instead we only focus on some hack and slay for people who can't get a good killing spree done in real life and need to compensate for missed army time?
exactly, it doesnt. that was his whole point, to show you how ridiculous your argument was
- 3
-
games with mature themes: pst, motb, witcher
2 out of 3 were made by obsidian so i think they know what theyre doing, no worries there
-
Better this than a consolized list inventory.
how is it consolized? windows, A PC operating system, has list view for its folders
just make both, icons and lists, so people can use whatever they prefer
-
humans are a popular choice for a playable race because it allows players to easily identify with them so getting rid of humans entirely would be hard
however one could turn the usual human supremacy on its head and make them a minor subjugated species struggling against a seemingly almighty oppressor - this could be the aforementioned ilithid slavedrivers, or a favorite of mine, a race of evil sadisic overlords like the drow
-
if camera absolutely must be locked due to 2d backgrounds, at least let us inspect the avatars close up from any angle on the character screen
they said models would be 3d so that should be easily doable
-
inner-party relationships are mandatoy if your aiming for a realistic and mature world however
think about it, a group of 4, 5, 6 (actually, how many willit be exactly?) out in the wilderness and dungeons for weeks and months all by themselves - theres bound to be romance and sex eventually, and resulting jealousy and rivalry. it would be nice however if it werent all focused on the PC. relationships should evolve naturally between all party members, and if the PC tarries too long he might find himself the odd man out without a partner, at which point he needs to slay or otherwise dispose of a competitor to claim one for himself which can result in many potentially interesting roleplaying opportunities
- 1
-
tropes to avoid:
-ancient evil rising
-hero has amnesia
-village peasant turns out to be chosen one
but since MCA will be writing this its safe to assume that none of this will be included, or will be subverted in some way
-
Thank god. Turn based combat would have turned me off the game immediately. RTwP is much more engaging and exciting.
same here. turned based makes sense for handhelds because of reduced cpu power, but since this will be a pc exclusive there is no reason to not go real time
I give you one reason: having a deep tactical combat like in X-Com, Jugged Alliance and Tactics Ogre (sacrilege, a console game !!!!)
baldurs gate and icewind dale also had good tactical combat while being real time with the added benefit of being more immersive. it depends more on the encounter design than what system you use
Not as deep as the games I mentioned (tactically speaking) . And, belive me, if you know all the balancing issues of AD&D (as I knew when I bought Baldur's Gate, having played AD&D for years), you can win 9 out 10 encountes using the same tactic. Slightly different story for IWD...
however this game will not be AD&D so that point is moot
obsidian have all the freedom to create their own system that is tailor made for RTWP and that offers the same or more depth than a turned based one
-
anythign but classic tolkien goody two shoes elves and humans and dawrves with scottish accents
if elves then they should be evil and dark like the drow or eldar from warhammer
so i guess tradictional with a twist
-
Thank god. Turn based combat would have turned me off the game immediately. RTwP is much more engaging and exciting.
same here. turned based makes sense for handhelds because of reduced cpu power, but since this will be a pc exclusive there is no reason to not go real time
I give you one reason: having a deep tactical combat like in X-Com, Jugged Alliance and Tactics Ogre (sacrilege, a console game !!!!)
baldurs gate and icewind dale also had good tactical combat while being real time with the added benefit of being more immersive. it depends more on the encounter design than what system you use
- 1
-
would up my pledgy if this art style was confirmed for the game. its awesoem and fits the mature theme perfectly
doesnt have to be JS if hes not available im sure obsidian have other artists that can replicate the style
-
dwarves and elves are pretty boring and overused but how about drow and their equivalent duargar dwarf counterpart? obviously they cant use these names as they belong to AD&D but they could use the same concepts
drow are very underused in rpgs. they featured prominently only in NWN underdark expansion and had some minor appearenes in other games so there is a vast potential there
and it would fit the mature tone that obsidian said they are aiming for
-
i would be up for it
-
it's an rpg - by its very definition that allows everyone to play it the way they want to
you can enjoy the mechanics and story
other enjoy building their chars and make cool screens of them to show their friends
live and let live mate
-
Thank god. Turn based combat would have turned me off the game immediately. RTwP is much more engaging and exciting.
same here. turned based makes sense for handhelds because of reduced cpu power, but since this will be a pc exclusive there is no reason to not go real time
-
be that as it may, this is their DREAM project, wher they can do everything that publishers dont allow them to, and its their only chance so they should be 1000% behind this doing whatever they can to promote it and get more cash
so Im also surprised that there is not more activity from MCA and the crew d days after the KS went live
-
free camera would be nice
how else will you take upskirt screenshots of your female chars?
Do you want firearms in Project Eternity?
in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Posted
but in WOW technology and magic or on par, thats why they coexist in relative harmony, and a hunter with a bow does the same damage he does with a rifle