angshuman Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 If you read that article carefuly, you will notice that barring a few exceptions (such as Half Life 2), the only resolutions where CPU scaling is evident is 1024x768 and lower. Once you go up to 1280x1024 and 1600x1200 there is virutally no CPU scaling at all. Even for Half Life 2, it's only the 3000+ that holds it back slightly at 1280, anything above 3500+ is great. At 1600, even the 3000+ does well. Look carefully at the graphs. A lot of them seem to be at 800x600 resolutions! Way to go, firingsquad! However, there are a lot of meaningful graphs as well. Look at Doom 3's results. That game stresses the GPU's shaders and memory bandwidth like no other, and I believe is very representative of near-future games. FX-55 becoming a bottleneck? Sure, if you're playing Quake 3 at 300 frames per second. Give me any modern game running at an Image Quality level that results in 60 frames per second on a 7800GTX SLI-or-not, and show me that an FX-55 is a bottleneck. I'll eat my GTX. Let me give you my definition of a CPU bottleneck: When the highest IQ setting that can give you a smooth 60 fps (substitute with your favorite fps) is constrained by your CPU, you have a CPU bottleneck. If your favorite fps is close to 300, you'll likely run into CPU bottlenecks all the time.
EnderAndrew Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 The precious.... http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/Produc...5_13041,00.html
alanschu Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 The precious.... http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/Produc...5_13041,00.html <{POST_SNAPBACK}> We wants it!
metadigital Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 Although it looks a fast ship (You've never heard of the Millennium Falcon?), there is no benefit for multitasking in games, yet. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
EnderAndrew Posted August 16, 2005 Posted August 16, 2005 That's why I don't wait to get a dual-core processor. I'll get one in a year or so when games start using it.
alanschu Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 get 'em while theys hot The subtitle of the thread. Am I the only one that thinks they'll always be hot?
alanschu Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 I believe my CPU is a 60 Watter! And it doesn't even give off light energy like my lightbulb does, so it must be even warmer
EnderAndrew Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 I like to touch hot things to test how hot they are.
jaguars4ever Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 ..and youre looking at the guy who bought a full price 6800U the day before they released the 7800's <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ...there's a swift kick in the mustn't-touch-it, eh???... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What he didn't tell you is that he threw the box away and thus couldn't take it back either!
angshuman Posted August 17, 2005 Posted August 17, 2005 I like to touch hot things to test how hot they are. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Be careful, buddy... last I heard, Malak liked to touch hot things with his tongue to see how hot they are.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now