July 15, 200520 yr Railroads actually looked the best I think in the original Civ, when they were just a straight line connection.
July 15, 200520 yr Author I think you two are in violent agreement. Me too, and I am unanimous in this. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr Nah, it was more of a passive resistive agreement. A cold war agreement, so to speak :D
July 15, 200520 yr Author I must be Cuba, then. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr :alanschu: Soon I'll just stop with the 's, but I don't think I'm quite at the :darque: stage yet. It's an awfully big step to make to hit :darque:dom
July 15, 200520 yr Author It takes a concerted spamming effort, I don't think you have reached that level of commitment just yet ... OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr Author :meta: OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr Darque recently accused me of using "instigation style tactics" in an argument. How is that not gold? ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
July 15, 200520 yr Author Well, that is just another name for "passive aggression". In other words, Darque is accusing you of deliberate provocation through passive means (i.e. not an outright attack, but a threatening encroachment). OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr What, the tactics? I am officially clueless. EDIT: This post has been modified to correspond with the mended post #289 by metadigital. The modification goes as follows: I know, did I ask? ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
July 15, 200520 yr Meta, you are now spamming this lovely thread with references to British groups that I don't even like, and I'm too stupid (or blessed?) to even begin to understand why? Please don't be so out there. ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
July 15, 200520 yr Author I know, did I ask? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm not sure if you are proposing a tactic for Civ that you would like to see, or have used in the past. Please explain. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr You're more about Thought Police style tactics, I see. ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
July 15, 200520 yr Author Well, I would like to see more secret services in Civ4. The ability to control the population through the media, build an illuminati ... but what about you and your ex post facto post editing? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
July 15, 200520 yr Darque is not an instigator. She can be frustrating because she is dismissive and can answer a lengthy rant with :darque: Volourn is instigative. GroinOfDespair is as well, to a lesser extent.
July 15, 200520 yr I have not accused Darque of being an instigator. I merely pointed out that she used a humourous and very Darque-esque choice of words when she thought I was being a touch rude. That got settled pretty quickly, however, and is in fact quite irrelevant to anything concerning Civ4. ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
July 15, 200520 yr Author So why did you post it in my lovely Civ4 thread? Edit: "instigation style tactics" is quite a quixotic notion, if left unexplained. But, as I was there at the time, I have interpolated to extract my observations, above. Edited July 15, 200520 yr by metadigital OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Create an account or sign in to comment