Sylvius the Mad
-
Posts
374 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Sylvius the Mad
-
-
I think once PE is done they can start getting some attention. And campaigns can be turned around quite well - Takedown and Shadowrun Online were ones that, very near the end, didn't look like they'd make it.
The D&D Documentary was clearly not going to make its funding target, but then 7 days out, Paizo promoted the campaign in their regular e-mail flyer. And they tripled their funding in two days.
-
I think Shaker looks really good, but I think it's been poorly marketed so far.
I doubled my pledge to Shaker earlier today.
-
If you think it costs $100K to pay someone $100K, you've never run a business.
I would estimate the cost of employing someone to be 2.5 times their base salary (not including benefits). So if you pay someone $50K, the total cost to you for employing that person is about $125K. There's infrastructure and insurance and payroll taxes and all sorts of other costs. Frankly, that Zeits only costs $100K tells me that they're only paying him $40K for his work on the project.
-
2
-
-
Because it is 100% incorrect to say that old AD&D 2nd edition was a "slow progression" system. The first few levels were actually pretty quick, about comparable with 3.0 or 3.5. Then it started to drag, even though (unless you were a spellcaster, of course) you were getting less and less to show for the increasing amounts of xp you had to hoick down in order to level.
The low-level advancement rate was slowed considerably by the regular character death.
-
In the IE games I find pre level 7 to be really tedious, and you often don't get the fun stuff 'till 12+, so I guess my hope would be start about level five IE equiv and be able to get to ~ 25 IE equiv, which encompasses the range of competent enough not to be killed by a rat to pretty much power incarnate. The less level one and two dinking around getting killed by a cricket, the better IMO.
this is a very good point. The first few levels really are pretty dull combat-wise because of a lack of abilities and spells. I really hope we don't go through most of the game that way.
I completely disagree. I vaslty prefer low-level gameplay in the IE games.
-
so if a game is a pretty lengthy 50 hours, you'd want to finish the game at level 5?
That would work for me, yes. That would make either the gaps between the levels quite large, or make the whole game primarily low-level gameplay.
Though I think I'd need a game to be 80 hours before I would call it "pretty lengthy". 50 hours would be something more like "adequate".
-
BG - Hold Monster
This is based on a single event from the first time I ventured into Durlag's Tower. I didn't know I was near the end of the dungeon, and I decided to pop into the next room before resting. I had a mage-heavy party, and I was low on spells. Lo and behold, through the door I found the final encounter - the Demonknight - and I was pretty much out of tools. So, in desperation, I had Viconia cast Hold Monster at him. The Demonknight had 95% magic resistance, but on this occasion I got the roll I needed, and he was Held. A bit of hasted archery later and he was dead.
I stumbled into a major boss fight completely unprepared, and still won, because I rolled a 20, basically. It was awesome.
That's something AD&D did really well. The crazy outcomes that were always possible (but usually extremely unlikely) made for great stories.
-
1
-
-
Sylvius, I agree with everything but the last bit. I would want to level significantly more often than that. Probably about double. It doesn't take 10 hours to learn how to use new abilities and enjoy them.
Depends on the abilities.
Remember, in 10 hours you'd see all six party members gain a level. How all those abilities work together creates many possible permutations.
-
I love the Adventurers' Hall because it's probably the only way I can indulge my complusive need to use as many wizards as possible. My standard BG and BG2 parties had 5 wizards in them. Since Obsidian probably isn't going to provide us with 4 wizard companions, I'm going to have to make my own.
-
On this issue, can we have some prty members stay stealthed (or behind cover, or generally placed where we want them) as long as they're not the ones doing the talking? I can see why it might be necessary to move the speaker, but leave the rest of the party alone.
And further, can the speaker be someone other than the PC? Can we send in a companion to speak on behalf of the party if it makes sense for our party to do so?
As I mention in my signature, I will pay money for this feature.
-
To some degree it depends on how much advancement each level represents, and whether all of the characters level up together.
I've made it clear that, on the second point, I don't think characters should all level up together. I think they should earn XP independently, and perhaps even have different XP/level tables for each class (like AD&D did). Having characters level up separately makes levelling up a more common occurence, suggesting that each character should level up less often.
On the first point, I like to learn how to incorporate any new abilities that came with my new level before moving on to the next one. So I level up, gain some abilities, laern how to use those abilities effectively, spend some time enjoying that effectiveness, and then level up again.
If the new abilties that come each level are only marginally different, or if there aren't many of them, then we can level up more often.
I've previously stated that I think 10 hours of gameplay per level (for a single character) is appropriate. So if you have 6 similarly levelled characters, in 10 hours of gameplay they'll each level up once.
-
3
-
-
so it should be my job to figure out how the designers intend for the game to be played?
Why do you care how the designers intended the game be played? Play it how you like to play it.
-
2
-
-
Also is it just me or is there a few hiccups in the video, it almost looks like images being displayed for a split second and then the video continues. Look at 34-38 seconds in the video as well as the last 5 or 6 seconds though it happens 3 or 4 times during the full length...maybe its just me.
I saw those, too. I kept trying to pause the video right then to see if there was a hidden message.
-
Okay, so not a huge deal, but what kind of weird resolution is 1650x1050? I'm grateful for something other than 16:9, but I wasn't expecting 11:7.
Yeah, what's 1650x1050? Should have been 1680x1050
16:10 is my preferred aspect ratio.
-
It is, unequivocally, not the game designer's job to protect us from ourselves.
Every product in the world should come with an "I am not an idiot" button which I can press and then fiddle with it without interference from those features that are supposed to keep me from doing it wrong.
-
2
-
-
I just look at the stretch goals "Mobile support" That alone proves it is definitely not going to be my kind of rpg, think I will stick with Project Eternity.
Good luck to them though.
Those really old CRPGs actually port quite well to mobile. Oubliette (whose creator, Jim Schwaiger/Victor Helsing, actually accused Wizardry of stealing his idea) was released for the iPhone last year, 34 years after it debuted on the PLATO mainframe. The only gameplay difference is that you cast spells by choosing them from a menu rather than having to type in their names (which was, admittedly, part of the fun, because the guy had invented his own magical language that you kind of had to learn - I have fond memories af casting Fieminat or Geibor).
-
Yes. The problem is that I don't even know what kind of old school RPG it is going to be. Wizardry style? Anachronox? Baldur's Gate? Or maybe Rogue? I'm on the fence with this one, I must admit.
IT'S OLD SCHOOL. What more did you need? Considering their credentials it's obviously going to be a first-person, platforming tactical RPG.
Brenda tweeted that it's a first-person interface like Wizardry.
They need to put that in the Kickstarter proposal.
-
If anyone deserves credit, it's the one-two punch of Order of the Stick followed by Double Fine Adventure. Maybe the knock-out blow was Wasteland 2.
Project Eternity is actually coming in a bit late to the game.
The OotS Kickstarter really was impressive. Rich only wanted to raise $57,000 to reprint some of his books, and he got about $1.2 million. OotS demonstrated that an established online community can and will band together to support the thing that brought them together, and support it a hell of a lot.
DFA then demonstrated that game designers have loyal followings.
Wasteland 2 demonstrated that gamers will flock to the promise of old school gameplay, particularly if there's nostalgia involved.
Project Eternity demonstrated that even larger, well-established game developers can bypass traditional publishing.
-
I've not read the full update yet, just watched the video...
but I just about fainted when they "confirmed" the Adventurer's Hall.
We MUST reach that stretch goal! I have to sell some crap to raise some money to send Obsidian more.
I just increased my pledge.
-
That's one down. The Adventurer's Hall fulfills one of my two major requests for Project Eternity. I promised to double my pledge if you offered both of them, so this gets some money from me.
All that remains is for Obsidian to let us know whether we'll be allowed to use any party member as party spokesperson (like BG, IWD, or SoZ). That's my other request. You'll see it again below in my signature.
I am not against it, but I doubt it, just because of the huge extra overhead of writing new dialog for every character besides the main PC.
If they do it the way BG did it, there's no extra writing at all. None. Not one line.
-
That's one down. The Adventurer's Hall fulfills one of my two major requests for Project Eternity. I promised to double my pledge if you offered both of them, so this gets some money from me.
All that remains is for Obsidian to let us know whether we'll be allowed to use any party member as party spokesperson (like BG, IWD, or SoZ). That's my other request. You'll see it again below in my signature.
-
1
-
-
Strictly adhere to the same rules as the PC.
Now, that's not to say that different races can't have different rules, and companions can't be races unavailable for the PC. No, only that if the PC could be a member of that race, those same rules would apply to him.
Moreover, I'd like to be able to assign all of the companion's abilities, regardless of at what level the companion is encountered. Let me build that character - within the pre-assigned race and class - from the ground up when he joins the party. That way we get more freedom in party construction - if I want 3 archers, I can have three archers, even if only one of the companions was actually intended by Obsidian to be an archer.
-
Limited ammo is completely pointless if you can carry 1000 arrows in a stack.
Unless they have significant mass. But yes, smaller stacks, I think, are a better idea. I wouldn't go higher than 40.
-
I like limited ammo because I like bows to be powerful. With unlimited arrows, powerful bows are grossly unbalanced, so then limited ammo is required to bring bows back in line with other weapons.
Honestly, I think BG handled this well. If you wanted to carry enough arrows to supply a pure archer through any significant adventuring area, you needed the inventories of 2 characters to carry those arrows.
-
2
-
Making the game support 1 handed (cursor only) play - disabilities
in Pillars of Eternity: Characters Builds, Strategies & the Unity Engine (Spoiler Warning!)
Posted · Edited by Sylvius the Mad
The one feature that makes one-handed play viable is having a clickable pause button in the UI somewhere. That way the game becomes playable with just the mouse even without having extra buttons on your mouse.
Also, it's not just disabled players who would use such a feature. Many of us have kids now. It's a lot easier to play these games with a baby on your lap if you only need one hand (otherwise you risk having the baby roll onto the floor, and that's an awkward one to explain to the wife).