Outsdr

So, anyone who thinks a game is bad is a "little whiny sh***"? I've seen numerous user reviews giving valid reasons for this game being bad, and none of them seemed whiny to me. But what bothers me the most is when you say: "stop calling the game a bad game and would actually enjoy the game and spread the word that it's a good game, the game would sell more." Essentially, you're telling everyone who dislikes the game to just shut up and like it and tell people it's good so that it sells more copies, and the more it sells, the better the game will be. Why should people who don't enjoy a game be expected to wait for it to improve? What's wrong with expecting a good game in the first place, especially when a lot, if not most, DLC is an additional expense? One of the biggest problems with PC games is that they cannot be returned - there is no incentive, therefore, for a game manufacturer to improve their product beyond what has already been sold. Heck, I'm not even sure PC game can be returned if it's defective. The only way a PC gamer can make a point about a game that is disliked is via word of mouth. This game is getting hammered on Amazon reviews, and while I understand this is only one site, I think it probably presents a good enough cross-section of users to be valid. I enjoy playing video games. I enjoy playing GOOD video games. But you know what? I'll be darned if I'm just going to "sthu" when I'm dealing with a game that I perceive as being problematic and bad. If "awesome developers" want more money to "make better games" there's really a very simple answer: Make a good game in the first place, and go up from there.