you all seem to have left the understanding on what made kotor 1 so much better than kotor 2. sure it would be great if there was a giant battle but really the storyline doesn't connect and thats really why kotor 2 failed. you go from kotor 1 being about the republic had suffered a great defeat somewhere and is depleted which is when your on the last republic hope for a peaceful galaxy gets totally trashed and its you against the sith. when you got there it was like it felt true. you could sense that taris was declining the lower sith soldiers resented doing what they did [the patrol in the upper city cantina] and raiding the biker gangs hide out made you truly feel like an old west gun slinger. and it gave you the adrenaline rush that you couldn't get caught and your missions and how they were important contributed to the timeline. then you get to kotor 2 and it really doesn't make sense. then why do you have to stop kiera from getting on that planet. sure mabee she has force sensory through the galaxy but there really is no point and shes so old she'll probably die there. furthermore it doesn't make sense how a sith master can just loat around the galaxy save you then try to kill you at the end. kotor 3 has to show the end of the republic, what the 2nd failed to accomplish. a giant battle and a republic celebration just doesn't seem that fun. and when will we finally have a standard character so we start off were we left off instead of alll these random heros. and if you argue that the republic cannot die then you could have them die and then true followers of the republic start up the republic again on another discarded planet like the one with secret mandalorian base.
