If I'm looking for pirate/ship RTS game I will purchase game with this content.
If I'm looking for game like BG, IWD, POE, I hate deal with RTS.
I think make these minigames optional is good way for everyone. Or not?
Surely a better way is to make the game content better rather than make it skippable.
What about people who don't like the combat? Better make that skippable.
What about people who don't care to read? Better make all the dialogue skippable (and I don't mean just skipping ahead, I mean literally no dialogue options/consequences - there are plenty of people who are put off by having to read dialogue in games, let's appeal to them too).
What about people who don't like creating a character? Better make it so that there are pre-built characters that level themselves.
Well, you are probably one of ppl who like have everything in one but nothing good enough.
If you buy TV, you probably want from TV to have integrated microwave oven and small fridge. And of course mobile phone...
When I buy something I wish I have exactly what I want. I will not buy weapon If I need clean garden. I will not buy car If i need watch TV....
You wrote "My point was less about constructive feedback (which OP didn't give) and more about 'can I skip game content?' which I don't think is constructive."
You are wrong. Making some aspect in game optional IS constructive. And why? Because there already a lot of (Almost) same options. Difficulty option, AI option, and yes even graphic option.
Because you think everyone like some aspect in game (like megagigasuper graphic quality with bilion shadows or super cool naval battles), that not mean everyone else HAVE TO share your opinion.
My personal feedback is constructive - make this thing optional for who don't like mix RPG with RTS. All what offer you is forcing content to everyone w/o care how much they like it.