J.Froste

Ahh, but I will never realize how that hurts me, so I suppose that you will have to carry the knowledge of what I am missing out on. How cruel the world can be to put on you such a heavy burden, my heart goes with you... And give my regards to the emperor, I've heard that he has gotten some new exquisite clothing! :D

Disgustingly shallow. Dont I just love these constant attacks on my personal tastes? the Lord of the Rings the Return of the King the Lord of the Rings the Fellowship of the Ring the Lord of the Rings the Two Towers Extended Edition (yes, I have watched myself somewhat tired of those three but especially the first one blew me away on the first viewing.) Pirates of the Carribean (good fun) Minority Report (slightly disturbing and not completely logical but interresting nontheless) Gladiator (Well done through and through) Braveheart (Now dont get me wrong, I dislike the religious fervor that brought this one together but I have a soft spot for epics with selfsacrifice as their theme. It appeals to my ideals.) the Others (I've watched a LOT of horror films lately but this is the only one that has made my list. I credit it for being moody and for not beeing nonsensical.) Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (So totally me.) The Truman Show (What can I say, I like Jim Carrey, especially in his half serious roles) Shrek 2 (The swedish version is completely hillarious.) the Incredibles (I was really down when I saw this one, and it lifted me right back up really) the Matrix (Sure it's been a while since I saw that one and I hated the two following it. But at the very time that I saw it I loved it.) Liar Liar (Funny.) Unbreakable (The first time i viewed it the tape wasn't rewinded properly so I missed the first part of the film. It was almost completely incomprehensible then but that only made it incredibly charming.) What people and especially critics should realize is that depth is not an entirely external thing that can be lain at the feet of things such as films and books. Depth is conveying an emotional meaning through subtle means. Subtle as to the perception of the observer. Those who fail to see those subtle indications also fail to percieve the depth (the emotional meaning that is being expressed), while those who see them too easily will not consider it depth, but rather something simplistic. Even so however, a main part of the depth lies in the resonance between the elements of the film and the viewers emotions, it is not at whole a part of the film but rather of the film and the viewer together. What is depth to one person is not neccessarily depth to another. I percieve but one thing as being truly shallow, but I wont say what for the reason of not being shallow. Yes, that is more than enough for you to figure me out which is the exact reason as to why i hate conversation. I always make myself get caught in loops... Ohh and by the way, this is the kind of stuff that makes Frasier funny to me.

That's not what my fancy, 500-page, 50