Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

How good, mediocre or plain bad will Deadfire be?

Spill the beans

  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

#61
Gromnir

Gromnir

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 7729 posts
  • Location:Sleeping in my office.
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

 

So... the catchphrase is meant to be post-coital?

 

knee-jerk response were, "no."

 

however, while am decided not freudian, we can see how our traditional exeunt would work from such a pov.  so sure, go with post-coital. will make a few o' our posts more colorful and others a bit more disturbing, but such would be, as it always is...

 

HA! Good Fun!  


  • Suen, Karkarov, IndiraLightfoot and 5 others like this

#62
Karkarov

Karkarov

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 3116 posts
  • Steam:Karkarov
  • PSN Portable ID:Karkarov
  • Xbox Gamertag:Karkarov
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Watcher
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

So the whole game turned bad all of a sudden because one single build option that was unarguably overpowered is impossible now? Guys...

I see even you are capable of making that most classic mistake.  You are applying logic, in an forum thread on the internet, on a niche website dedicated to a rules/mechanics heavy RPG.

That blunder is only slightly less famous than engaging in a land war in Asia.

Seriously though people, there is 0 reason to believe Deadfire will not be  more successful and well received than Eternity 1.  Reviewers who got early review copies, and have tweeted their thoughts, have all basically universally liked the game.  I recall one where the guy said it was "a game of the year contender". 

Additionally the Backer Beta at this point is worth less than monopoly money.  We know it is versions behind, we know they have adjusted the gameplay since that version likely multiple times.  Hell, we know it was not the most recent version of the game on the day they released it as the latest backer beta even.

So we should probably stop holding it up as an example of how the game will play in all regards.  It didn't hold water in Eternity 1, it won't in Deadfire.

But to avoid falling into the logic pit trap myself.....   God Deadfire is gonna suck!  If only the MC was Commander Shepard (from ME2 obviously), the game had 50% VO only, and Rammstein had made the main theme song.  Then this game would like rock for real!


  • illathid, InsaneCommander, Skazz and 2 others like this

#63
InsaneCommander

InsaneCommander

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2076 posts
  • Location:Drinking with Mirke in a Deadfire bar
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

 

So the whole game turned bad all of a sudden because one single build option that was unarguably overpowered is impossible now? Guys...

I see even you are capable of making that most classic mistake.  You are applying logic, in an forum thread on the internet, on a niche website dedicated to a rules/mechanics heavy RPG.

That blunder is only slightly less famous than engaging in a land war in Asia.

Seriously though people, there is 0 reason to believe Deadfire will not be  more successful and well received than Eternity 1.  Reviewers who got early review copies, and have tweeted their thoughts, have all basically universally liked the game.  I recall one where the guy said it was "a game of the year contender". 

Additionally the Backer Beta at this point is worth less than monopoly money.  We know it is versions behind, we know they have adjusted the gameplay since that version likely multiple times.  Hell, we know it was not the most recent version of the game on the day they released it as the latest backer beta even.

So we should probably stop holding it up as an example of how the game will play in all regards.  It didn't hold water in Eternity 1, it won't in Deadfire.

But to avoid falling into the logic pit trap myself.....   God Deadfire is gonna suck!  If only the MC was Commander Shepard (from ME2 obviously), the game had 50% VO only, and Rammstein had made the main theme song.  Then this game would like rock for real!

 

 

Wait... you can't play as Shepard?!?  :woot:

 

Now I'm worried.


  • Karkarov and Boeroer like this

#64
anathanielh

anathanielh

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 429 posts

 

 

So the whole game turned bad all of a sudden because one single build option that was unarguably overpowered is impossible now? Guys...

I see even you are capable of making that most classic mistake.  You are applying logic, in an forum thread on the internet, on a niche website dedicated to a rules/mechanics heavy RPG.

That blunder is only slightly less famous than engaging in a land war in Asia.

Seriously though people, there is 0 reason to believe Deadfire will not be  more successful and well received than Eternity 1.  Reviewers who got early review copies, and have tweeted their thoughts, have all basically universally liked the game.  I recall one where the guy said it was "a game of the year contender". 

Additionally the Backer Beta at this point is worth less than monopoly money.  We know it is versions behind, we know they have adjusted the gameplay since that version likely multiple times.  Hell, we know it was not the most recent version of the game on the day they released it as the latest backer beta even.

So we should probably stop holding it up as an example of how the game will play in all regards.  It didn't hold water in Eternity 1, it won't in Deadfire.

But to avoid falling into the logic pit trap myself.....   God Deadfire is gonna suck!  If only the MC was Commander Shepard (from ME2 obviously), the game had 50% VO only, and Rammstein had made the main theme song.  Then this game would like rock for real!

 

 

Wait... you can't play as Shepard?!?  :woot:

 

Now I'm worried.

 

Wait... WHAT!? How can you have Mass Effect: Deadfire without Shepard!?? They're prolly going to replace Garrus and Tali too.  ;(


  • Karkarov and InsaneCommander like this

#65
Karkarov

Karkarov

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 3116 posts
  • Steam:Karkarov
  • PSN Portable ID:Karkarov
  • Xbox Gamertag:Karkarov
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Watcher
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Wait... WHAT!? How can you have Mass Effect: Deadfire without Shepard!?? They're prolly going to replace Garrus and Tali too.  ;(

WHAT? Replacing Garrus?  NO BROOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!


  • InsaneCommander, Ryz009 and anathanielh like this

#66
Suxamethonium

Suxamethonium

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 15 posts
I like the talking sword, takes me back to Ultima 7 (and yes, get off my lawn!)
  • Skazz and tiamatbubbles like this

#67
Tharanga1

Tharanga1

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 11 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Deadfire Backer

Look at the difference between icewind dale (witch released after BG2) and BG2

 

BG2 :

 

- Story driven

- narrative driven

- companion driven

- huge enormous game 

- able to shape the world around you

 

ICE WIND DALE 1 AND 2:

 

- dungeon orientated

- very combat heavy

- long long long grind

- no companions that impacted narrative

 

The end result:

 

BG2 - the best RPG of all time BY FAR

 

ICEWIND DALE - killed of interest in crpgs until Pillars of Eternity

Thare's no grind in ice wind dale 2


  • Karkarov likes this

#68
Ganrich

Ganrich

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1463 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

ROFL at the idea that IWD2 killed cRPGs.  There is a lot of game history as to why the genre died, and it has nothing to do with the quality of IWD2.

 

Story time:

 

In the year 2000 the PS2 released, and became huge.  Rumors were circulating that Microsoft was making a console.  Sega left the hardware business because they knew they couldn't compete with Sony, Nintendo, and MS simultaneously.  Meanwhile on PC we were at the tail end of a golden age.  An era of great RPGs, RTS games, shooters, and so on.  The PS2 actually hurt the PC market badly, and when the Xbox (more the 360) released some more PC gamers left.  Even more left with the 360 imho, but I don't have the numbers.  The developers on PC that foresaw the changing of the winds made moves to make console games.  Bethesda and Bioware in particular.  Thus they quit making PC cRPGs, and focused on a bigger market.  The devs that didn't see what was happening, or didn't move fast enough to move to console in time, went under.  Examples Interplay and Troika.  There was a lonely 3rd category of developer though, and they released a game in 2004 that made them immune to this whole situation.  IE Blizzard made WoW. 

 

Oh, and another PC dev survived by creating a unified patching system for their, and other company's titles.  This was Valve and Steam.  Epic started making Console games, idSoft made the move with Doom 3, and so on and so on.  However, if it weren't for Valve I don't know if PC gaming would have survived.  I like to think so, but I am unsure. 

 

Consoles killed western cRPGs, not IWD2.  Also, NWN2 came out after IWD2, and even though it isn't an IE game... It's still a cRPG.

 

Watch any interview about the death of Interplay and Black Isle, or an interview about Troika.  They all mention the move to consoles.  It has much more bearing on the death of the genre than IWD2 could ever dream to. 

 

Also, IWD2 is great.  I dare anyone to make a game that good, and that big, in 9 months.  Those devs deserve high praise for it. 


  • Archaven, Karkarov, sp3cw4r and 2 others like this

#69
Boeroer

Boeroer

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 14829 posts
  • Location:Bucharest, Romania
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Right.

 

But to be fair: maybe master guardian meant that IWD killed his own personal interest in cRPGs until PoE. 


  • Karkarov, Ganrich, InsaneCommander and 1 other like this

#70
master guardian

master guardian

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 339 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I think what i was getting at was that the icewind dale series failed to captivate the the market enough for gaming studios to keep releasing more games like BG2 and IWD.

 

and yeah history has obviously proven that i am 100% correct . There hasnt been anything like it up untill Pillars 1 was released.

 

How you go from best RPG of all time  (BG2) to nothing else made like it for well over a decade is beyond my understanding.

 

Pretty big disaster from my point of view because CRPGS are the only games i like.


Edited by master guardian, 02 May 2018 - 10:58 PM.


#71
Ganrich

Ganrich

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1463 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I think what i was getting at was that the icewind dale series failed to captivate the the market enough for gaming studios to keep releasing more games like BG2 and IWD.

 

and yeah history has obviously proven that i am 100% correct . There hasnt been anything like it up untill Pillars 1 was released. 

 

Pretty big disaster from my point of view because CRPGS are the only games i like.

 

I still don't see how it proves you right.  This sort of game isn't an easy port to consoles, and it never was.  I'm surprised Obsidian did it with PoE 1.  The 5 man party of Deadfire, and slower combat might make 2 better on consoles tbh. 

 

Also, Bioware did a BG spiritual successor in 2009.  It was Dragon Age:  Origins.  Of course they made it with the intentions of being a console game and reduced party size and did all sorts of crazy things to make it work better for consoles.  Hence the difference in the outcome vs the IE games.  Ugh, how I cried when they implemented Aggro/Taunt mechanis in a single player game.  I'm fine with it in MMOs, but it is tedious to play with it in a single player game.  At least to me.  Also, they went full 3d because it was more cinematic, but they also did it because IMHO they were trying to fuse it with a toolkit similar to NWN which did really well.  IMHO, they spread it too thin, but to each their own.

 

Between IWD2 and DA:  O we had 2 NWN games that used RtwP combat, and albeit different in aesthetic they still retain a good portion of the ideas of the IE games.  Save the move to 3.0 and 3.5 respectively.

 

I forgot to mention that there was one more contributing factor to the death of old Isometric RPGs, and that is 3d modeling in games.  It was trendy, people liked it so it sold, and NWN proved the toolkit could pump out a lot more content than building the old Isometric maps.  The devs viewed it as a win/win.  Some of us didn't like it as much, and I have a feeling that you and I might agree on that point.  Although, I appreciated the toolkit giving me tons of content... I still missed the IE games. 

 

The IE games, and all top down 2d rpgs of yesteryear died because of PC gaming waning, consoles blowing up, and 3d graphics.  I still think history is on my side here.  However, we may have to disagree. 


  • Archaven, wanderon, Night Stalker and 1 other like this

#72
master guardian

master guardian

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 339 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

i couldnt get into the NWN series . I tried and tried but just couldnt do it.

 

TBH i have only ever really enjoyed the BG series and Pillars series.



#73
Ganrich

Ganrich

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1463 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

i couldnt get into the NWN series . I tried and tried but just couldnt do it.

 

TBH i have only ever really enjoyed the BG series and Pillars series.

 

That is 100% fair.  I understand it completely because I felt similarly.  I played NWN when it launched, and beat the OC plus the xpacs.  Then when I was REAAALLY bored I played some of the modules.  A few of which were much better than the Core stuff from Bioware.  NWN2 had MotB, and it is worth playing.  Story is fantastic.  It also has some great mod made content.  I thought they both, but the first one more so, were really clunky.  Even at launch.  However, as a D&D nerd... I played them.  Sometimes your group just can't make the time. 

 

I felt the same way with Dragon Age.  It felt clunky too.  Something about the IE games, and PoE for that matter... feels so smooth.  It's like top shelf liquor.  No burn, and makes you feel all warm and toasty.  I love the IE games.  All 5 of them for varying reasons.  I just remember the turmoil in the PC gaming sphere in the early 2000s, and either we lost companies to closing down, or they started making console games, or they focused on a giant MMO i had little interest in.  I use to talk to my friends about the four "B"s of PC games.  Bioware, Black Isle, Blizzard, and Bethesda.  They were the only PC companies I bought games from day 1 at the time.  Man I miss those days.  All of them around 2003 closed, made an MMO empire, or went 3d. 


  • illathid likes this

#74
rheingold

rheingold

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1085 posts
  • Location:Cape Town
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I though DA Origins and NWN 2 were great, at least as good as Shadows of Amm.... Shock, horror. But then I also liked the Icewind Dale series.

Bit worried about Deadfire to be honest, hope they haven't stretched themselves thin, and the writing is up to their usual standard. 

But it wouldn't be the first ( or last ) time I'm wrong. So here is to holding thumbs.



#75
Tattyblue

Tattyblue

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 59 posts

 

In the beginning the forum will sing its praises as is their usual play. But the metacritic rating will not exceed or match Pillars (89). Nor will its steam rating be as high (85% positive)

 

A game can change its setting, it can change its tone, it can change its mechanics, but it will lose fans when it does all 3 in its very next sequel. Many non super fans who did not follow it for weeks or months on end will not understand the need for changes on many mechanics. They will be looking for pillars and will be getting something very different. Many of the reviewers like IGN will probably punish the game's review score for the change in tone.

 

I feel like sales will be similar to the first game but it will not grow the IP in popularity. In the start the game will be great for the beta super fans (Boeroer) who will love it no matter what, and it will be mediocre to the people who liked Pillars but do not like all the changes (myself). I dont think anyone will think its bad well maybe (Sonicmage)

 

I think you have jumped the gun a bit here. You are speaking as though you have a crystal ball witch you obviously dont. 

 

From what i can tell the only noticeable changes are the casting system and resting (mainly how resting affects casting).

 

Yes i do wish they left casting alone but i may possibly be thinking that way because " I would rather stick with what i know", eg now i have to go through the hassle of relearning the casting system again and finding out how it works best. This will take time and could be considered work that i wouldn't have to do had they not changed the casting system hence why im pissed off.

 

Only time will tell if i am happy with the new changes. Even after playing the BETA my mind is not entirely made up on the new changes.

 

Having said that i cant see OBS going backwards with this. They have definitely improved on the narrative, graphics and not included stupid mistakes like they did in pillars one with that second "big " city that was a complete flop. They will have one big "Athkatla" style city now.

 

In my humble opinion what will make Deadfire will be the story and narrative. Will it be as immersive as BG2. This will be the absolute test.

 

The only thing they did was change armor, dual wield pistols, added mechanics like penetration, slowed everything down especially magic with up to 6 seconds of recovery, increased interruption, created subclasses, created multiclasses,  changed most talents into class abilities, remove a character slot, change the tone from a dark corpse littered child soul stolen game into a pirate game with talking swords and bright colorful trees. Thats not much at all. Wait...



#76
Naughtyusername

Naughtyusername

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Not gonna lie i had fears for this game not being as good as poe1 because things like *cough* Fallout 4 *cough* have taught me that great things will turn to **** for a cash grab. But hell, playing the backer beta and reading everything about the game has cured any of my fears, I can confidently say i think poe2 will surpass poe1 in every way, the game is just plain epic, the multiclassing was a great addition to an already amazing game thats just going to add so much fun replay value, the way combat feels now is so good, just everything, its so awesome and i am so hype for the game!



#77
gamefan1978

gamefan1978

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 9 posts
  • Location:Iowa
  • Steam:gamefan1278
  • PSN Portable ID:gamefan1978
  • Xbox Gamertag:gamefan1978
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
I think reviews will be good with complaint’s that POE 2 is to simaler to POE.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Spill, the, beans

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users