Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

RANDOM VIDEO GAME NEWS - FREE WHITE HOUSE MONTAGE


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
587 replies to this topic

#581
injurai

injurai

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2043 posts
  • Location:Not the oceans
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

 

It's like you are trying to be dense. Adult content placed in a stripper den in the middle of the red light section of a city modeled off of a real city, where vast amounts of the npcs are depicted as everyday goers is somehow not a sensible context for adult content? When it's fleshing out a reflection of the real world?

 

That context is leagues apart from an abstract puzzle game that has dubiously aged anime girls succumbing to a hormonal fit of heat that melts their minds into subservience towards the player, then going on to use such window dressing as you're primary branding to sell what is ultimately a puzzle game.

 

People should have a way of avoiding having such content marketed towards them, whether opt-in or opt-out.

 

You are making a completely irrelevant point. Sex in context = fine. Gratuitous sex = OMG unacceptable! This is a ridiculous distinction—sex is sex—especially considering that the "context" in question is the antics of a psychopathic drug addict and it's placed there for obvious shock value. Because Trevor's life is a totally sensible reflection of real world people and events.

 

But yeah, I get your meaning. GTA is art for connoisseurs who can appreciate its exquisitely deep nuanced satire of something or other, hentai puzzle games are for losers. Ok guy.

 

And by the way, I've never had a single example of such a game pop in my Steam feed. I'm guessing you'd have to go looking for them specifically, much like you used to have to walk into the "adult" area in video rental shops. Opt-outs are fine, of course. I want one for shovelware, though. That **** triggers me like like nobody's business.

 

 

Quite the knack for extrapolation you have there. The argument was about marketing and perceptions as they are received by portions of the consumer market, that different context are judged differently by different people whether sound or not. It was an example of two different contexts of adult content, pulled straight from something that got a pass and something that didn't. The emphasis was further on outward marketing that would enable consumers to make those judgment calls vs. games where such content is a minor proportion which is not even marketed. Happy trails.



#582
Melusina

Melusina

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 470 posts
  • Location:Croatia
  • Steam:Sorceress
  • Deadfire Backer

Besides, steam bought this current problem onto themselves. Lack of meaningful curation is big problem.


Edited by Melusina, 20 May 2018 - 04:54 AM.


#583
213374U

213374U

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 5246 posts
  • Location:PIGS
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

 

 

It's like you are trying to be dense. Adult content placed in a stripper den in the middle of the red light section of a city modeled off of a real city, where vast amounts of the npcs are depicted as everyday goers is somehow not a sensible context for adult content? When it's fleshing out a reflection of the real world?
 
That context is leagues apart from an abstract puzzle game that has dubiously aged anime girls succumbing to a hormonal fit of heat that melts their minds into subservience towards the player, then going on to use such window dressing as you're primary branding to sell what is ultimately a puzzle game.
 
People should have a way of avoiding having such content marketed towards them, whether opt-in or opt-out.

 
You are making a completely irrelevant point. Sex in context = fine. Gratuitous sex = OMG unacceptable! This is a ridiculous distinction—sex is sex—especially considering that the "context" in question is the antics of a psychopathic drug addict and it's placed there for obvious shock value. Because Trevor's life is a totally sensible reflection of real world people and events.
 
But yeah, I get your meaning. GTA is art for connoisseurs who can appreciate its exquisitely deep nuanced satire of something or other, hentai puzzle games are for losers. Ok guy.
 
And by the way, I've never had a single example of such a game pop in my Steam feed. I'm guessing you'd have to go looking for them specifically, much like you used to have to walk into the "adult" area in video rental shops. Opt-outs are fine, of course. I want one for shovelware, though. That **** triggers me like like nobody's business.

 

 
Quite the knack for extrapolation you have there. The argument was about marketing and perceptions as they are received by portions of the consumer market, that different context are judged differently by different people whether sound or not. It was an example of two different contexts of adult content, pulled straight from something that got a pass and something that didn't. The emphasis was further on outward marketing that would enable consumers to make those judgment calls vs. games where such content is a minor proportion which is not even marketed. Happy trails.

 
What? No, seriously. What? "different context are judged differently by different people" is an argument that needs formulating? Do you use purposefully obfuscatory grammar and meaningless syntagms to confound or just randomly pull stuff out of the thesaurus? The point of contention was that sex in certain games would get a pass, whereas in others it wouldn't. Then you went off on a tangent about "context" as if somehow that makes the sex in games less sex, because fleshed out game world or something.
 
And now you're going off on yet another tangent about marketing and judgment calls. What on earth does that have to do with pulling some games but not others based on complaints by a bunch of Christian fundies from "Morality in Media"? In fact, if anything, that's Valve taking the ability to make value judgments away from customers. If the problem is games using any remotely sexual elements as a marketing ploy, we're going to have to do away with a lot of stuff, you see.


Edited by 213374U, 20 May 2018 - 08:37 AM.


#584
Keyrock

Keyrock

    Obsidian Order Rodent Tamer

  • Members
  • 7257 posts
  • Location:The Queen City
  • Steam:Keyrock
  • PSN Portable ID:Unfrozen_Keyrock
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

giphy.gif


  • Chilloutman likes this

#585
Bartimaeus

Bartimaeus

    (11) Wizard

  • Members
  • 1754 posts
  • Steam:Ask!

[people arguing with each other about different things intensifies]


  • melkathi likes this

#586
Chilloutman

Chilloutman

    (9) Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1303 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Looks like Paradox is on fire



#587
melkathi

melkathi

    Teddy Bear Adventurer of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 3352 posts
  • Steam:melkathi
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

My money is on TrueNeutral breaking them up eventually because the argument will reach the post limit for the thread .


Edited by melkathi, 20 May 2018 - 01:15 PM.

  • TrueNeutral and marelooke like this

#588
TrueNeutral

TrueNeutral

    Forum Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 2613 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Steam:funderbunk

Huh. Now closing this for length feels super weird. Thanks, melkathi.


  • melkathi and marelooke like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users