Jump to content

Why are bass(fish) and bass(instrument) pronounced differently?


kirottu

Recommended Posts

Google says the instrument pronunciation comes from Latin, the fish from Italian.

 

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=bass&searchmode=none

 

Damn GET variables. Or are they POST.

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google says the instrument pronunciation comes from Latin, the fish from Italian.

 

I think google is a bit off - Bass (instrument) comes to English from Italian Basso which is from the Latin word Bassus.

 

Bass (fish) comes to English from Middle English Bas, which derives from the Old English word bærs (similar to Dutch Baars) which itself derives from the Germanic Barsaz.

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google says the instrument pronunciation comes from Latin, the fish from Italian.

 

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=bass&searchmode=none

 

Damn GET variables. Or are they POST.

 

Rule of thumb: If you can read the parameters in the URL it's GET. :)

No mind to think. No will to break. No voice to cry suffering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they are pronounced differently, because they come from different sources.... What do you english barbarians think letters are for?

This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they are pronounced differently, because they come from different sources.... What do you english barbarians think letters are for?

 

Not much, we mostly use email now... :dancing:

  • Like 2

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Google says the instrument pronunciation comes from Latin, the fish from Italian.

I think google is a bit off - Bass (instrument) comes to English from Italian Basso which is from the Latin word Bassus.

 

Bass (fish) comes to English from Middle English Bas, which derives from the Old English word bærs (similar to Dutch Baars) which itself derives from the Germanic Barsaz.

Yep. Misread the link I found. Serves me right for trying to browse web on phone at work :p

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they are pronounced differently, because they come from different sources.... What do you english barbarians think letters are for?

 

Seriously though (I can't just leave the joke answer), the tradition in English is to spell and pronounce words from other languages as they would have been in that language (or at least as close as you can get translating it into the English Alphabet).  Sometimes over the centuries, the origin of the word gets obscured, but the pronunciation remains.

 

In this case the spelling got changed; can't tell you why bas in Middle English became Bass in English.  At some point that's how someone codified it to be.

 

Typically you'd find Shakespeare (the biggest of the early Modern English authors), Dr. Samuel Johnson (influential Modern English Dictionary in the early 1700s), and/or Noah Webster (for American English) at the root of such things, but given the timing we might also find blame for Robert Cawdrey, Thomas Blount, Edward Phillips, John Wilkins and William Lloyd, or Elisha Coles as I think they all created modern English dictionaries prior to Johnson.

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

County ← Anglo-Norman counté ← Old French conté ← Latin comitātus, meaning "Jurisdiction of a Count"

 

Country ← Middle English contree ← Old French contree ← from vulger Latin contrata as used in the phrase terra contrata meaning "land opposite"
 

My guess (can't find any evidence online to support it so possibly wildly inaccurate) is the "u" in Country came from one of the standardizers of the language.

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next : why is draught pronounced like draft

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next : why is draught pronounced like draft

 

My understanding its because in Middle English, gh was pronounced as either f or w.  The Old English source word was dræht which in turn came from dragen, "to drag"; so Draught would have originally been pronounced drawt (belying its origin in draw). 

 

However even by early modern English there were uncertainties on gh - Shakespere rhymed "daughter" with "after" and "slaughter" for example. Over time the "gh" for "f" pronunciation won out over the "gh" for "w" in the case of draught to the point that the American language changed it to "draft" because who has time for all those extra vowels and consonants, right?

  • Like 2

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time to make an Ask Amentep thread.

  • Like 2

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So they are pronounced differently, because they come from different sources.... What do you english barbarians think letters are for?

Counting?

 

 

I, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, ix, x, xi... No, not going to continue until d

 

Roman computer science was doomed from the outset. Just try to make sense of the following pseudo code:

 

for i = i to x do {

  i = i + i;

}

 

what the heck is i at the end of the loop? 1, 2 or 55?

“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, their compilers would work with that numbering system, so I,V,X,C,D,L,M wouldn't be any more permitted than you naming a variable 7 (unless you have some weird ass AST :p)

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While there are marine varieties of bass (as well as freshwater), even those are not deep enough (in the ocean) to drop the bass.

sky_twister_suzu.gif.bca4b31c6a14735a9a4b5a279a428774.gif
🇺🇸RFK Jr 2024🇺🇸

"Any organization created out of fear must create fear to survive." - Bill Hicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, their compilers would work with that numbering system, so I,V,X,C,D,L,M wouldn't be any more permitted than you naming a variable 7 (unless you have some weird ass AST :p)

 

Early versions of Fortran made it possible to redefined numerical constants in your code ;)

  • Like 2

“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looks like I speak a lot of things completely wrong.

I am from germany.

 

I was told, that a long time ago in english the spoken language and the written language was the same, but over time the writing changed while the speaking stayed the same. Is there any truth in this?

 

In german, when you read something it is most of the time clear how to speak it. I was told that this is because in the past germany consisted of many different small kingdoms ( or whatever the monarch was called, duke, earl, count, . . .) each with their own dialect. When it became possible to print books, authors tried to write in a way that it can be understood in as many regions as possible so they sell more books. As a result, most authors around germany wrote the same way and since people read the same everywhere they spoke the same everywhere, because the books would show the correct way. Once again, I have heard it, I have no evidence.

 

I really hate french (the language, not the people). I learned it for 4 years at school, but I have forgotten everything. Nothing is spoken as you write it. You have to leave away half of the letters, but the question is which ones. I hate advertisment, but without it I would never know how to speak Peugeot (sorry, I know only cars, movies and food from france).

 

About roman computers: How did the romans use numbers above 3999? M (1000) is the biggest number I know. No 5000, 10000 or more.

Edited by Madscientist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Modern English (and I haven't went back to re-read about it so as always I could be wrong), the primary attempts to standardized the form really comes from Dr. Johnson's dictionary as it was the most comprehensive and thus became widely used.  This was all well and good until about a century later when Noah Webster based a dictionary on the American use of English where he also simplified a lot of spellings (draught - draft, colour - color).  When Engish adopts words, it tends to adopt the pronounciation, which leads to some of the exceptions in spelling in words (typically ones borrowed from French).

 

With Roman Numerals, a bar over a number means that number times 1000. So 5,000 would be a V with a bar over it, 10,000 an X with a bar over it (I can't represent it graphically)

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. Are you a linguist?

 

About english, if I am not sure I look into the oxford dictianary because a) we used it in school and b) I have it at home.

I do not know the differences between british and american english (or any other dialect) but at least in internet forums and when talking to other people nobody complained that they cannot understand me so far.

The best english (as in I can understand it best) I have heard in norway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...