Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Volourn

How Liberals Treat Blacks Who disagree With Their Agenda

Recommended Posts

"Being an embarrassment to your race" is one of the most racist statements you can make.

According to you it is, the thing is do you consider yourself someone who has a deep understanding and view of bigotry? 


"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

 

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's funny is that you think it's a subject that requires deep understanding. May be you have a degree in that?


"Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's funny is that you think it's a subject that requires deep understanding. May be you have a degree in that?

You don't need a degree but it  does require  some historical understanding and empathy around the history of the Europeans 

 

But things get complicated around this topic and its not necessary to go into details unless you really want to get a different perspective ?


"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

 

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the risk of sounding a bit dramatic, I'd say the lack of respect for democracy is probably in the top 5 greatest threat's to the entirety of western civilization right now. The other 4 things would be (in no particular order): porn, Alex Jones, the Russians, and deplorable Trump supporters everywhere.

Edited by Chippy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if this thread serves any purpose other than furthering the pissing contest between the left and right here in this forum. If this has to continue, can we at least make a politics subforum so that those of us not interested in this partisan bickering don't have to see it every time we look for other topics in the board?

The real question is, how could a debate over how a country should be run turn into imbecile bitching (includes me... More of a sentiment towards society, not specific people)?


Everybody knows the deal is rotten

Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton

For your ribbons and bows

And everybody knows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hereby make a proposal: How about we completely ignore the followers of ideologies from here on out and focus exclusively on the ideologies themselves, as well as maybe their head figures and representatives? So no more talking about "the liberals", "the conservatives", "the libertarians", "the socialists" and so on but rather let's talk about "liberalism", "conservatism", "libertarianism", "socialism" and so on.

Edited by Ben No.3

Everybody knows the deal is rotten

Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton

For your ribbons and bows

And everybody knows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd actually say the followers are just as much as important as the ideology itself because they the followers shows how the ideology actually interacts and does when brought to the real world?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hereby make a proposal: How about we completely ignore the followers of ideologies from here on out and focus exclusively on the ideologies themselves, as well as maybe their head figures and representatives? So no more talking about "the liberals", "the conservatives", "the libertarians", "the socialists" and so on but rather let's talk about "liberalism", "conservatism", "libertarianism", "socialism" and so on.

Liberals- Status quo **** with "diversity".

 

Conservatives- Status quo **** with "traditional values".

 

Libertarianism- Status quo **** with extra "freedom™"

 

Social Democracy- status quo **** with "meaningful reforms".

 

Status quo = Capitalism with liberal democracy.

Edited by KaineParker
  • Like 1

"Take your child murderin' god and shove his him up his own ass."-Volorun

 

"...the vote of a black redhead disabled homosexual transsexual Jew should probably be worth the same as at least a hundred white heterosexual Christians."-Rostere

 

"i can think of many women i would gladly sleep with, but not a single one that i would want as a girlfriend/wife... neither real nor fictional."-teknoman2

 

"I'm all for killing dogs in film." - algroth

 

"Iselmyr is the one who did GOMAD... Aloth is lactose intolerant" -ShadySands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People always trying to put me in a box but I've mastered the art of boxlessness

  " boxlessness "  :lol:

  • Like 1

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

 

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must say, I figured this thread would be a total flame war with a green dragon circling angrily overhead. 

 

Didn't turn out to be that way at all.


"I care nothing for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it"

Abraham Lincoln

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People always trying to put me in a box but I've mastered the art of boxlessness

boxlessness is an art, but boxing is the sweet science.  ah, the beautiful vagaries o' language.

 

the only art Gromnir has mastered is transcendental napping. 

 

HA! Good Fun!

  • Like 1

"Those who won our independence by revolution were not cowards. They did not fear political change. They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty. To courageous, self-reliant men, with confidence in the power of free and fearless reasoning applied through the processes of popular government, no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present, unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion. If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."--Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...