Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Twitter is the world's armpit.

 

Edit:  On second thought, Twitter is that stretch of skin between your dong (if you're male) or hoohah (if you're female) and your ***hole, the taint.  Twitter, the world's taint.

Edited by Keyrock

sky_twister_suzu.gif.bca4b31c6a14735a9a4b5a279a428774.gif
🇺🇸RFK Jr 2024🇺🇸

"Any organization created out of fear must create fear to survive." - Bill Hicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twitter is the world's armpit.

 

Edit: On second thought, Twitter is that stretch of skin between your dong (if you're male) or hoohah (if you're female) and your ***hole, the taint. Twitter, the world's taint.

Yep. Now the average level of FOAF bull**** you hear in bars now can reach millions :lol:

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Puppies and coloring books in the "safe spaces" LOL!. I have two questions:

 

1. Were they being mocked?

2. If yes do they know it?

"While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before"

Thomas Sowell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Congratulations America, you put GamerGate into the White House"

 

Is that supposed to hurt us? Because, THANKS.

 

DON'T MISS WITYH GAMERS AND THEIR GAMES YOU SJW NAZI PIECES OF CRAP!!!

DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just out of curiosity, how's Thiel a racist?

 

"He supported Hogan who called his daughter's boyfriend the n word. Plus he supports Trump who is racist, sexist and homophobic which means he can't be gay and must hate women as well as hating pocs. He also hates free speech because he and Hogan [plus the jury that awarded Hogan more than he asked for] put Gawker out of business and media should be protected [when targeting those I dislike]. He's alt right [gak] and just a horrible rich white guy whose policies would target the poor who include a lot of pocs"

 

Slight paraphrasing, of course, but I've seen all those 'arguments' made.

 

My response would normally be an eye roll and quote of Cicero's devastatingly casual response 'narratus tepidarius frater' which so infuriated Mark Anthony, if it weren't so emblematic of everything that went wrong on the 'progressive' side. Hypocritical, unappealing to anyone who isn't already convinced yet appears to be effective because the only opinions valued by those saying it are people who already agree with them. As someone who actually is pretty left it's about the most stupid tactic I can imagine, it's already failed and continuing use of it just suggests that lessons will not be learned.

 

Yes, Thiel is racist because he supports Trump and Trump is racist because he's supported by racists. It's the perfect ouroboros of the "progressive" mind.
  • Like 1

"Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The narrative has been set:

 

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU8/status/798050268688437248People are calling for a bloody revolution.

Meanwhile in the real world liberals are blaming the "Berniebros" for Trump's win and are dismissing class rhetoric as the concern of "single-issue voters" who don't care about PoC, women, LBGTQ people etc. Edited by Barothmuk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CxFH2N9UAAAn9z9.jpg

 

 

That picture seems to be more against Trump than in support of him. As one of the reasons why people say they supported Trump was that he is against political correctness and this picture implies that first three members in his administration have been selected because of political correctness and not because of said people's abilities.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That woman helped him win the election. She clearly got where she is because of her abilities.

Indeed, and the media has glossed over the fact that she was the first female campaign manager in a successful Presidential election. Sexism.

 

 

Can you guys believe all those sexist, bigoted democrats didn't want him to win so his campaign manager wouldn't succeed? Hard to believe how hateful some people are!

  • Like 2

"The Courier was the worst of all of them. The worst by far. When he died the first time, he must have met the devil, and then killed him."

 

 

Is your mom hot? It may explain why guys were following her ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The narrative has been set:

 

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU8/status/798050268688437248People are calling for a bloody revolution.

Meanwhile in the real world liberals are blaming the "Berniebros" for Trump's win and are dismissing class rhetoric as the concern of "single-issue voters" who don't care about PoC, women, LBGTQ people etc.

 

 

Since the term "BernieBro" is a manufactured one by a think-tank employed by the Clintons to smear voters for Bernie as misogynists, i prefer not to use it. But, anyways, the BernieBros are the Trotskies to them and are treated as traitors since they have to gall to claim that the system is ****ed on a broader scope. They will be first against the wall before the enemy.

"Some men see things as they are and say why?"
"I dream things that never were and say why not?"
- George Bernard Shaw

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

"The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

- Some guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

CxFH2N9UAAAn9z9.jpg

 

 

That picture seems to be more against Trump than in support of him. As one of the reasons why people say they supported Trump was that he is against political correctness and this picture implies that first three members in his administration have been selected because of political correctness and not because of said people's abilities.

 

 

I'm pretty sure they'd say that it's a successful PR person, a self made billionaire and a prestigious surgeon who happened to be a woman, gay, and black respectively and were picked for their accomplishments alone. OTOH I'm also pretty sure they weren't actually the first three members of his team anyway.

 

And, of course, if Hillary won and had picked a woman, a homosexual and a poc the same people making the pic would be shouting political correctness, whatever their qualifications. Nature of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Congratulations America, you put GamerGate into the White House"

 

Is that supposed to hurt us? Because, THANKS.

 

DON'T MISS WITYH GAMERS AND THEIR GAMES YOU SJW NAZI PIECES OF CRAP!!!

Oh yes that makes loads of sense volo, we want to find meaningful similarities between GG and the Trump presidency because GG was a huge success....right volo    :shrugz:

"Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss”

John Milton 

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously ****tards didn't pay attention in social studies here when they were younger when it was explained how presidential election worked and function.

The popular vote don't mean ****, it was designed as the electoral votes meaning the most so that every citizen felt no matter where they are, their votes counted. Otherwise people from 3 states could dictate the direction of the country and the other states felt like their voice wasn't heard.

 

Now WHAT IS the problem and was not original designed, is the winner take all way the states are operating. Each state had assigned amount of electoral voters and by math, each candidate be assigned so many voters to how many the state had. Democrates in California wouldn't get ALL 55 voters and maybe a lil over half. BUT wait there's more!

https://youtu.be/i_thvwaKryY

Now think about third party candidates, theybreally feel they have no voice at all, BUT if we get rid of the winner takes all votes that all the states adopted later on, we would actually see 3rd party actually having votes and taking away from other party votes they mass amountvas they do today.

 

The system was actually a lot better and a helluva lot less confusing before they adopted that policy, which they can drop at anytime and I still don't know why they haven't.

 

Since for the mass majority of the time, popular and electoral votes always matched up except in 4 chances (3 really, 1 was just a govt total **** you to Andrew Jackson) to motivate voters, they gave the impression that their individual vote maters and is important, which isn't a lie but more of u thinking it's directly for the president but instead it does matter but in a smaller scale so that voters everywhere could be on a more level playing field.

 

Sorry rants over, I'm not getting into politics but it's just frustrates me that the ignorance is being so blantant out there. It's like read a ****ing book on the ****! Confused, pissed off? Instead of assuming what u think is what's right, look that **** up other than on media and Wikipedia sites. No, go to a ****ing library and pick u up a encyclopedia and sit down and quietly read mother ****er!!!

 

Now I'm waked and baked and had a ****ty week AND I'm gonna take my own advice and go look this **** up so I'm not just sprouting stoned high comments.....

 

Carry on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's the point, redneckdevil.

 

(Also, IMO Wikipedia is more trustworthy than most encyclopedias as long as you go the extra mile and verify or add to their sources. I'm an armchair archeologist, it stuck because I was a dinosaur nut as a kid, and I've yet to find an encyclopedia that isn't riddled with errors or outdated information about the subject. I use that as an example because it's something I can recognize mistakes and false information in, but I have no reason to believe the same doesn't hold true for any other subject and I just can't notice. Wikipedia as a user-generated platform has its flaws and can get screwed over on subjective or divisive topics and you're better off finding your own sources at all times, but **** the idea that old school paper encyclopedias are better.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Oh yes that makes loads of sense volo, we want to find meaningful similarities between GG and the Trump presidency because GG was a huge success....right volo    :shrugz:"

 

It was. Look at all the butthurt and entertainment it gave me. It was bIGLY successful.

DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's the point, redneckdevil.

 

(Also, IMO Wikipedia is more trustworthy than most encyclopedias as long as you go the extra mile and verify or add to their sources. I'm an armchair archeologist, it stuck because I was a dinosaur nut as a kid, and I've yet to find an encyclopedia that isn't riddled with errors or outdated information about the subject. I use that as an example because it's something I can recognize mistakes and false information in, but I have no reason to believe the same doesn't hold true for any other subject and I just can't notice. Wikipedia as a user-generated platform has its flaws and can get screwed over on subjective or divisive topics and you're better off finding your own sources at all times, but **** the idea that old school paper encyclopedias are better.)

 

Really?  Huh, I mean I get the outdated information, but I'm surprised to hear they are riddle with errors.  I tend to caution my students against relying on any one source for all their information, and as you said, verify the sources when looking at wikipedia.  Trying to convince students to not use wikipedia is an exercise in futility, so it is better to get them to think critically about what they find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The narrative has been set:

 

https://twitter.com/WDFx2EU8/status/798050268688437248People are calling for a bloody revolution.

Meanwhile in the real world liberals are blaming the "Berniebros" for Trump's win and are dismissing class rhetoric as the concern of "single-issue voters" who don't care about PoC, women, LBGTQ people etc.

 

 

Since the term "BernieBro" is a manufactured one by a think-tank employed by the Clintons to smear voters for Bernie as misogynists, i prefer not to use it. But, anyways, the BernieBros are the Trotskies to them and are treated as traitors since they have to gall to claim that the system is ****ed on a broader scope. They will be first against the wall before the enemy.

 

Sanders better stay out of Mexico.

"Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't Hillary C. nominated using the same kind of system within her own party that people are complaining about now?

 

Similar but not the same as I understand it.  The Democratic party has Super-Delegates to the Democratic convention, so while the primary elections will determine which delegates or sent (or in what proportion for non-Winner-takes-all states), the Super-Delegates can, potentially, swing the party away from the vote of delegates.  No such entity exists in the Electoral College (and shouldn't, IMO).

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the Democrat primary is even a far worse, much less democratic system than the Electoral College, but it's fine so long as it gives the right result.

 

Some very good analysis here, almost all true: http://observer.com/2016/11/americas-emerging-nationalism-crisis/

 

I would only add that we need American nationalism, not ethno-racial nationalism, and the Republican party needs to become the party of working people, not corporate fat cats, and not just white working people either.

Edited by Wrath of Dagon
  • Like 1

"Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_4426.jpg

 

YES, YES, YES! This one says it all!

  • Like 5

"While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before"

Thomas Sowell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...