HoonDing Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 "30 million illegals" they sure breed quickly The ending of the words is ALMSIVI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leferd Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript 3 "Things are funny...are comedic, because they mix the real with the absurd." - Buzz Aldrin."P-O-T-A-T-O-E" - Dan Quayle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceVC Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript I dont understand? Is this is the legal response to closing down Breitbart? "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Correct Bruce. If you don't like it, don't read it. You don't get to make that choice for someone else. 1 "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) Hilzilla and her fellow globalist Ryan (or Pelosi, since Republicans voters may stay home this time), are going to legalize 30 million illegals, assuring that Democrats will never again be out of power. Not that they need it anymore, because of all the US citizen children of illegals and also legal immigrants, and illegals themselves breaking the law by voting. The open borders she wants with a bunch of third world Latin American countries assures we're heading toward third world status ourselves. Add to that a Supreme Court which won't enforce any law or protect anyone's rights, unless you're in a designated victim group, and the future looks very bleak to me. Look at any Democrat run entity, Illinois, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore to see what's in store for the country. In other news, Hilzilla's campaign already threatening to shut down Breitbart: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/18/hillary-campaign-vows-to-destroy-opposition-website/ Oh no.. they say she's got to go. Go go Hilzilla. Wooo ooo hoo ooo. I can do this all day! You guys wont believe this but I think I have just had an epiphany around how most of you Americans feel about free speech I was about to say that Breitbart should be closed because it is so divisive and basically encourages bigotry, I was then going to say i have no problem with reasonable right wing websites but they need to take some responsibility for what they say But then I thought, if you close down Breitbart now what is next? Who decides what is acceptable ? So you cannot close anything down...am I right about understanding the US idea of free speech in this case? Congratulations Bruce, you're starting to get it. May be you'll become a conservative in a year or two. Edit: Btw, GD, there's plenty of second amendment cases already heading to the Supreme Court, Hilzilla's court will have plenty of chance to throw out the whole thing in any one of them: https://www.thetrace.org/2016/03/important-gun-rights-questions-supreme-court-might-answer/ Edit2: Speaking of doom: http://www.hoover.org/research/americas-civilizational-paralysis Edited October 14, 2016 by Wrath of Dagon 1 "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 @WoD, three of those four concern State level regulation. I'm a little more predisposed to letting the States handle which weapons should or should not be allowed and under what conditions they can be owned. Remember the heart of the Heller case was total prohibition. That is the ultimate aim of the left and that is why Heller and Macdonald were so important because they assert an individual right to firearm ownership. Not an absolute right to be sure but good enough. The residents of the States in question have a lot more influence over their State Houses and can participate in passing or defeating such laws. And if such a law passes and is found intolerable by the people of the state they can recall their legislator, vote in a new governor or move to another State. Those options don't really exist when it's Uncle Sam's heavy boot on your neck. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
licketysplit Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Stick to your kiddie exercise programs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 @WoD, three of those four concern State level regulation. I'm a little more predisposed to letting the States handle which weapons should or should not be allowed and under what conditions they can be owned. Remember the heart of the Heller case was total prohibition. That is the ultimate aim of the left and that is why Heller and Macdonald were so important because they assert an individual right to firearm ownership. Not an absolute right to be sure but good enough. The residents of the States in question have a lot more influence over their State Houses and can participate in passing or defeating such laws. And if such a law passes and is found intolerable by the people of the state they can recall their legislator, vote in a new governor or move to another State. Those options don't really exist when it's Uncle Sam's heavy boot on your neck.Doesn't matter, they can simply rule that states can do whatever they want because second amendment is a collective right, not an individual one, which is the liberal judicial position. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceVC Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Stick to your kiddie exercise programs. But Beyonce is a role model for many women http://www.marieclaire.co.za/hot-topics/gugulethu-mhlungu-on-the-immense-power-of-beyonce "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcador Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Er..BLM is a domestic TERROR group? of Well I think BLM IS a terrorist group: Oh... wait, you meant Black Lives Matter? Sorry, I was referring to the Bureau of Land Management Dude in the hat is trying too hard. Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Yeah, Beyonce is not running for President. Beyonce is a great role model for dancers and entertainers. It's a stupid comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcador Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Stick to your kiddie exercise programs. Why do you think this comparison works ? Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) Trump, Hilzilla, and her husband are all horrible examples for children, that's not the issue. Forget a president we can be proud of, I'd settle for one who's not a criminal. Edited October 14, 2016 by Wrath of Dagon "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfted1 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Why do you think this comparison works ? Because shes "shaken" by sexual boasting but has no problem with her daughters presenting dat ass for mounting? 1 "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 In order for that comparison to work you also have to believe that Beyonce should be ashamed of shaking her ass. And while we are at it also that shaking your ass is the same as having your **** groped by Donald Trump. 1 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfted1 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Dunno what to tell you guys. The joke is; how can you QQ over someone boasting about sex while simultaneously holding a sex symbol up as an example to your daughters. 1 "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Donald was boasting about being a grabass, which is not the same as 'sex', now is it. It's not a subtle difference at all. 1 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elerond Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Being proud of one's own sexuality and being proud of one's ability to get away of molesting other people because they are famous are at least to me very different things even though they both have their roots in sex, as first is about person's right over their own body and second is person right over somebody else's body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 "You guys wont believe this but I think I have just had an epiphany around how most of you Americans feel about free speech I was about to say that Breitbart should be closed because it is so divisive and basically encourages bigotry, I was then going to say i have no problem with reasonable right wing websites but they need to take some responsibility for what they say But then I thought, if you close down Breitbart now what is next? Who decides what is acceptable ? So you cannot close anything down...am I right about understanding the US idea of free speech in this case?" HOLY ****! You figured out the common sense logic on why people oppose censorship at such a hardcore level. 1 DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
licketysplit Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Stick to your kiddie exercise programs. Why do you think this comparison works ? Because Beyonce is a hypocritical tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 So the presidential candidate can be replaced if he withdraws: http://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/20431 Perhaps they can convince Trump if he fails to present the exculpatory evidence his campaign claims to have. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 So let me see if I understand this correctly. The Republicans are essentially afraid that they will lose the next election, the one for the house of representatives because the Trump Campaign is so divisive and such bad PR for anyone calling themselves Republicans. 1 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guard Dog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Who the heck even knows anymore Gorgon. This is like monkeys playing rugby. "While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before" Thomas Sowell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 May be Bruce gets it now, but Obola still doesn't: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/10/14/obama-change-wild-west-media/ "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoraptor Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Perhaps they can convince Trump if he fails to present the exculpatory evidence his campaign claims to have. There's no way he can have exculpatory evidence though. That's the nature of historical accusations- they may be true or they may be false, but they're near impossible to prove false. Proving that you, say, weren't on a particular flight 30 days ago is a whole lot easier than proving you weren't on a flight 30 years ago, and any witnesses are almost certain to have forgotten. At that point it's just he said/ she said. And while there's an outside chance you might get proof for one accusation you aren't going to get it for multiple ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.ce846aae50e732dc4985eb712252381f.jpg)
Recommended Posts