we mentioned the failure o' the interviewer on multiple fronts. we did not attribute such failures to a website-- that would be ridiculous. lord knows we do not look at every failed vol or luckman post as a critique 'pon the obsidian message boards.
Haha, see, this is why I can't take you all that seriously. You're against the Codex for being a den of "racist *ssholes" when your entire schtick is based around being kind of an *sshole here. You just like hanging around in a place where you can dish it out but don't have to take it. Lazy.
oh, and attempting to divorce setting from narrative is idiotic. the setting is integral to the poe narrative. duh.
Great, but but that doesn't really change my point, does it? Josh talks about one kind of narrative but not the kind I wanted to know more about, so I interviewed Eric. I fail to see the problem here.
your persecution complex is getting the better o' you. there were nothing in our comments that suggested a slight towards codex. you wanna discuss codexian failings too? fine. all you need do is indulge in those things you Claim we has been offended 'bout. and is that a Gromnir ' quote? link please. put stuff in quotes if we didn't say it? more bad form... though am not the least surprised at this point.
and yeah, josh has spoken 'bout narrative, on multiple occasions. you not understand what is narrative? you have different specific narrative questions 'bout narrative? eric were also hesitant to answer your questions:
"I hesitate to talk a whole lot in very specific terms about themes and deeper meaning because people will start to use it as definitive evidence of this or that, and it deadens discussion."
perhaps josh were taciturn for same or complete different reasons? dunno. if you want josh to specific answer such questions, ask josh. as noted already, josh has shown willingness to answer narrative questions in the past.
am glad eric is more patient than Gromnir. typical questions from the interview is loaded or skewed or misleading, and how many questions ask eric to comment on josh, adam or chrisA comments? after the third such question, we would sent the list o' interrogatories back to the "interviewer."
Did you expect a gaming magazine-level civilized interview here? This is the Codex, and therefore the interview was designed to attempt to answer the most common questions on that forum without appearing biased. And believe me when I say that the interviewer (Infinitron) is one of the most outspoken Obsidian supporters over there.
is not 'bout "civilized." is 'bout stoopid. the goal is to get eric to provide more insights, not less, yes?
"I'm not sure what the question is referring to regarding Adam and Josh."
"I don't know about "my side of the story." "
if the goal is to be different than providing more or new, then congrats. we assumed the interview were aimed at getting eric to share more info rather than to offer interrogatories 'bout co-worker and former co-worker contributions. jesus, you can get the information the interviewer were aiming at w/o resorting to rusty chainsaw levels o' subtlety. am moderate surprised that the interviewer didn't specific ask eric to throw adam josh and chris under the bus. oh, wait, he kinda did.
HA! Good Fun!