Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Shouldn't all spells be per combat encounter? Not per rest?

resting for free exploitable

  • Please log in to reply
157 replies to this topic

#1
luzarius

luzarius

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 472 posts

UPDATE, April 29

 

I couldnt' resist the temptation of starting from a fresh slate. There are npc's that let you rest conveniently.  I couldn't help it and rested after each fight.  I WAS WEAK (Raedric's hold)

 

UPDATE:

 

SOLUTION: I've decided to incorporate a variation of scrotiemcb's idea.  Once you enter an area, you can't leave until it's cleared and you've used all your camping supplies. I've defined an area as a place you transition to and from.

 

Example #1: Outside of Readric's hold is an area, once the outside area is clear, you can go rest at an inn, but only when you've used all your camping supplies first.

Example #2: Inside of Raedric's hold is an area, once the inside is clear, you can go rest at an inn, but only when you've used all your camping supplies first.

Example #3: Radedric's dungeon is technically it's own area, once the area is clear, you can only go back to the inn and rest once you've used all your camping supplies first.

Example #4: Magran's fork is an area. You can only go back to the inn to rest when the entire area is clear and you've used all your camping supplies.

 

This seems to be a good starting point.  Keep in mind I'm on POTD and TOI settings.

 

OLD ORIGINAL POST:

 

I'm trying to understand why a lot of spells are per rest instead of per encounter.

 

Per rest means after each fight I have to run all the way back to rest at an inn or use camping supplies which is a time sink, this isn't really a penalty and more of an annoyance.

 

Keep in mind I play on POTD, TOI, blind playthrough, so I usually don't hold back when fighting. I approach each fight with overwhelming force to ensure victory.  The problem is having to constantly use all the camping supplies or having to constantly go back to the inn and rest.

 

Would it really change anything if all spells were switched to per combat encounter instead of per rest?

 

OLD UPDATE:

 

I've come to this conclusion - Since there is no penalty or resource drain for resting, then it leaves the current resting and per rest ability system in a flawed and exploitable state. (Resting for free is exploitable).

 

Btw, I love this game even in the current state so it's not that big of a deal.


Edited by luzarius, 29 April 2015 - 01:46 PM.

  • Bill Gates' Son likes this

#2
Sanctuary

Sanctuary

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 138 posts

Your initial playthrough shows how weak/bad the spell limitiation is.  If you don't hold back, you won't have what you need for bigger encounters, but if you hoard spells too much, you'll never actually be using them much; because you're too worried about what "might" be around the corner.

Also, if you are talking about Wizards and Druids specifically, things change at

Spoiler
, but I still think that's a bit too far into the game.

Some posters around here love to call it "depth" and "strategy", but it really isn't.  It's a class imbalance.


Edited by Sanctuary, 28 April 2015 - 11:35 AM.

  • ddillon, leeux and Vallendrian like this

#3
VahnXIII

VahnXIII

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 174 posts

Managing limited resources has always been part of the classic cRPG's. Some people enjoy this and others don't. People will vigorously defend their opinions either way. For me, I like having spells per rest and limited camping supplies. It makes me play smart and manage my resources appropriately. 


  • player1, Aotrs Commander, PrimeJunta and 10 others like this

#4
GrinningReaper659

GrinningReaper659

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 247 posts
  • Location:U.S.
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

I'm trying to understand why a lot of spells are per rest instead of per encounter.

 

Per rest means after each fight I have to run all the way back to rest at an inn or use camping supplies which is a time sink.

 

Keep in mind I play on POTD, TOI, blind playthrough, so I usually don't hold back when fighting. I approach each fight with overwhelming force to ensure victory.  The problem is having to constantly use all the camping supplies or having to constantly go back to the inn and rest.

 

Would it really change anything if all spells were switched to per combat encounter instead of per rest?

 

You're doing it wrong. The encounters weren't designed in such a way that you will need to sleep after every battle at any difficulty. Luzarius, I'm 90% sure you're a troll based on your post history, but I'm willing to respond because of that 10%. Now, if you want to play things your own way and rest after every single fight then that's fine, but don't expect the devs to accomodate your whacky playstyle at the cost of hurting other playstyles. If you decided to never rest, for example, you might come on here and explain how you refused to ever rest and that's why you need all spells to be per encounter and also why you need all health to regen after each encounter. However, the devs wouldn't be obligated to listen to your request, because never resting is a decision which you made which runs contrary to the design of the game. You do you, but don't expect the devs to also do you. that's just not right.

 

 

Your initial playthrough shows how weak/bad the spell limitiation is.  If you don't hold back, you won't have what you need for bigger encounters, but if you hoard spells too much, you'll never actually be using them much; because you're too worried about what "might" be around the corner.

Also, if you are talking about Wizards and Druids specifically, things change at

Spoiler
, but I still think that's a bit too far into the game.

Some posters around here love to call it "depth" and "strategy", but it really isn't.  It's a class imbalance.

 

No. Luzarius choosing to spam all his most powerful spells and not worry about taking damage and then rest after every encounter doesn't prove that spell limitations are flawed or anything else for that matter.


  • Luckmann, PrimeJunta, Kimuji and 8 others like this

#5
rheingold

rheingold

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1085 posts
  • Location:Cape Town
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!
Yup, not much wrong with the spells on rest, though it would be nice if Druids and wizards got per encounter earlier than 9th level. To be honest if they changed all their spells to per encounter instead of rest that would be seriously imbalanced. Nothing would be able to compete with a druid or wizard then. And the devs would then have to nerf the 2 classes which would be rather silly. Best to avoid this mess by conserving your spells....

Edited by rheingold, 28 April 2015 - 11:54 AM.


#6
b0rsuk

b0rsuk

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 592 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

I'm trying to understand why a lot of spells are per rest instead of per encounter.

 

Per rest means after each fight I have to run all the way back to rest at an inn or use camping supplies which is a time sink.

 

Only if you can't adapt and develop new tactics.


  • Luckmann and Namutree like this

#7
Luckmann

Luckmann

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 3497 posts
  • Location:The Scanian Flatlands

[...]
 
Would it really change anything if all spells were switched to per combat encounter instead of per rest?


Yes. Dear god, yes. Yes for more reasons than I can possibly explain to you. Christ, how can you even ask this question?

 

If anything, the blanket Per-Encounter bumps for Spellcasters at level 9 and 11 should be dropped completely.


Edited by Luckmann, 28 April 2015 - 01:03 PM.

  • PrimeJunta and Namutree like this

#8
b0rsuk

b0rsuk

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 592 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Would it really change anything if all spells were switched to per combat encounter instead of per rest?

 

You would open every fight with Relentless Storm, Sunlance, Conjure Greater Blight, Firebug or Plague of Insects. Then enemy dies. Another fight, identical choice of spells. You'd forget about level1-3 spells completely.

 

You could win the game with a party of 6 druids. Summon blights every single fight (the first is at level2). 6 druids * 4 spells = 24 blights per battle just from level2 spell without Bonus X Spell talents.


Edited by b0rsuk, 28 April 2015 - 01:21 PM.


#9
Tigranes

Tigranes

    Obsidian VIP

  • Members
  • 10491 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

"Keep in mind I play on POTD, TOI, blind playthrough, so I usually don't hold back when fighting. I approach each fight with overwhelming force to ensure victory.  The problem is having to constantly use all the camping supplies or having to constantly go back to the inn and rest."

 

=> "I play in a way that is extremely wasteful of the limited resources that I am given. This creates some frustrations. I think the game should be fixed so that my decision to ignore the strategic decisions presented by the game becomes reasonable."


  • PrimeJunta, kaiki, Kimuji and 7 others like this

#10
luzarius

luzarius

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 472 posts

Nice response:

- Okay no problem.

 

Mean response (open at your own risk, you've been warned).

Spoiler

 

NOW, since you guys like the current system so much, here is what I propose:

 

Path of The Damned - New Rule

 

- Resting at an inn costs 250 to 500 copper.

- Camping supplies cost 250 to 500 copper.

- (Optional) This is just an idea, but there should be an item you acquire called a "resting token", that can be used at an inn to rest.  These can only be found by adventuring through out the game.  This is a raw idea and would need to be improved and built upon, it's a RAW IDEA.

 

This is the only way I can see to solidify and make per rest magical abilities actually have value, meaning and worth.  If the above rules are implemented, THEN it makes your guys logic have meaning. I REPEAT, everything you guys mentioned has NO value, unless the above rule gets implemented.  All of a sudden if I want to go rest and replenish my per rest magical abilities, I have to make sure I can afford it.  Only now would tactics & strategy will come into play if I constantly have to drain my money (resource) to rest.

 

There is no penalty of any kind for resting, which leaves the current system in a flawed and exploitable state.

 

Don't get me wrong, I love this game, unfortunately it's a bit easy, even on the hardest difficulty.


Edited by luzarius, 28 April 2015 - 02:19 PM.

  • durbal likes this

#11
scrotiemcb

scrotiemcb

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 253 posts
  • Location:El Paso, TX
This is the third thread I've said this in. Oh well.

Limiting camping supplies isn't enough to actually stop players from resting whenever they want. The game needs to limit camping supplies AND prevent players from leaving areas until quests/tasks are complete.

Some examples from act 1
Spoiler


This would work best with optional quests, giving your party a chance to fail them if they retreat. However, that's fine; properly limiting camping for the main storyline isn't vital, so long as the system has a place to shine.
  • luzarius, denizsif, b0rsuk and 1 other like this

#12
luzarius

luzarius

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 472 posts

Limiting camping supplies isn't enough to actually stop players from resting whenever they want. The game needs to limit camping supplies AND prevent players from leaving areas until quests/tasks are complete.

 

Prevent players from leaving the area? Hmmm, that would make camping supplies have a great deal of value. That's a pretty clever idea.  I wouldn't mind seeing this for POTD difficulty.

 

 

if you leave the temple of Eothas to rest at the inn, you return to find Raedric's guards sealing it back up. If you talk to them, it seems Wirtan has been slain.

 

The first time I played this game, I was actually worried about this happening. I thought that if I waited to long that Raedric's guards would show up.  I also agree with this idea.

 

 

* if you climb up the vines to gain access to the sanctuary in Raedric's Keep, then go back to Gilded Vale, you find on your return the vines have been cut, and you need to find another way in. Also, the high priest only grants you one rest - he's not that generous to allow another.

100% agreed, this is another clever idea. Too bad that game isn't moddable *sigh*.



#13
Dadalama

Dadalama

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 148 posts

Yeah Vancian magic was always a pretty crap holdover from D&D. There's a reason that it's the only pnp game that currently uses vancian magic.



#14
johnmr531

johnmr531

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 32 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

This is the third thread I've said this in. Oh well.

Limiting camping supplies isn't enough to actually stop players from resting whenever they want. The game needs to limit camping supplies AND prevent players from leaving areas until quests/tasks are complete.

Some examples from act 1

Spoiler


This would work best with optional quests, giving your party a chance to fail them if they retreat. However, that's fine; properly limiting camping for the main storyline isn't vital, so long as the system has a place to shine.

Exactly people are exploiting the rest system by back tracking to the inn. So the devs need to prevent people from exploiting.  This could either be by stopping them from going back, respawning the enemies if the player leaves the area incomplete or spawn enemies at the player on the way out for not completing the area.


Edited by johnmr531, 28 April 2015 - 02:53 PM.

  • denizsif likes this

#15
Tigranes

Tigranes

    Obsidian VIP

  • Members
  • 10491 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

"I insist on exploiting the system to make the game much easier for myself. Clearly, the solution is to make resting much harder for everybody, including people who struggle with lower difficulties. What? You mean maybe shouldn't run back to the inn every ten minutes? That's just crazy talk! Oh, by the way, you guys all suck, this game is so easy."

 

Awwwwkay.

 

I actually would support more stringent resting limitations, but it's clear this would raise hell from many, many prospective players.


  • GrinningReaper659, jackjack and johnmr531 like this

#16
scrotiemcb

scrotiemcb

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 253 posts
  • Location:El Paso, TX
I think respawning enemies should be used very infrequently, if ever. However, scripted events which only occur if you attempt to retreat would be nice.

Oh, and on your first visit to Caed Nua...
Spoiler


One thing though: this shouldn't apply at all to casual exploration. If there isn't a quest (or at least a task) associated with it, you should feel free to rest-spam all you want. That said, some of the optional wilderness encounters should be brutal.

Edited by scrotiemcb, 28 April 2015 - 03:17 PM.

  • denizsif and b0rsuk like this

#17
Tigranes

Tigranes

    Obsidian VIP

  • Members
  • 10491 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Again, I'd find that an interesting challenge. I think you'd get ten times the number of current camping complainers coming in to go MY ONLY SAVES ARE AUTOSAVE & QUICKSAVE IN CAED NUA AND I CANT GET OUT THIS GAME SUCKS. 

 

Resting is notoriously difficult to balance for various players because it's so punishing for some players. They tried by scaling available camping supplies. I think resting should also have been more expensive (though this leads to people crying "I'm stuck, I can't rest because I'm broke and I can't get more money because I need to rest"), but if you're going to exploit the system in such an inconvenient and time-wasting way by running back to the inn all the time, then you have only yourself to blame if the game is too easy or frustrating.


  • oaktownbrown, Namutree and johnmr531 like this

#18
Captain Shrek

Captain Shrek

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 580 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

Maybe reduce the trash combat from the game? That might make per encounter D4D mechanics unnecessary. 



#19
luzarius

luzarius

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 472 posts

"I insist on exploiting the system to make the game much easier for myself. Clearly, the solution is to make resting much harder for everybody, including people who struggle with lower difficulties. What? You mean maybe shouldn't run back to the inn every ten minutes? That's just crazy talk! Oh, by the way, you guys all suck, this game is so easy."

 

Awwwwkay.

 

I actually would support more stringent resting limitations, but it's clear this would raise hell from many, many prospective players.

 

I see your point. But I've been doing no death, dead is dead, ironman, trial of iron rulesets for years. The first rule is to never limit yourself in any way, the game shows you no mercy during combat, so you have to do the same if you want to survive.   Exploiting bugs is not permitted, I never exploit bugs, but resting over & over for free is not a bug, it may be considered an exploit or an intended mechanic? I'm not sure. I was hoping to gain more info here on the forum.  It seems like free resting is a mechanic Obsidian agreed to allow players to use as they see fit, but it makes POTD difficulty much, much easier than it should be.

 

A toggle option in the menu would be nice (no leaving areas until cleared like scrotiemcb suggested).

 

For the record, this is not bothering my gameplay that much, it just makes POTD a bit too easy I think, but still I can't show the game any mercy, so I'll be resting VERY often.


Edited by luzarius, 28 April 2015 - 03:23 PM.


#20
scrotiemcb

scrotiemcb

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 253 posts
  • Location:El Paso, TX
A lot of that can be fixed with signposting. For example, there is someone right outside Caed Nua who mentions that it's scary in there. Maybe add a little piece of dialogue which triggers based off party Health, advising maybe they should rest up first.

Now if players just skip all dialogue, I feel they deserve what they get.
  • luzarius, oaktownbrown and denizsif like this





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: resting, for, free, exploitable

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users