Jump to content

No room for more tactical combat?


Recommended Posts

I know, I know, this is probably getting old - but still.

Is there no way at all that the combat system can become less annoying than it is now? What I mean to say is that it's too similar to the combat in BG and IWD: frantic, hiccupy, and very random.

I know a lot of people would argue that strategy is needed, prebuffing, counterspelling, etc, but I still can't wrap my head around the fact that it doesn't look and feel any different from the old system, with all the aforementioned flaws. I remember IWD was a continuous haste-rest cycle for me, to the point that it felt more like a chore than a game, and from what I'm seeing, the "learning curve" (difficulty at low levels) in PoE is in the same ballpark. Also, there isn't much strategy to be had, when a 6-man party is getting minced by a single stone beetle, which apparently shrugs off spells, knockdown attempts and some type of damage (although I like to think that this is a beta related issue).

I'm not saying a complete turn-based system would be the ideal solution, but something along the lines of KotOR II would be great, IMO. At least that combat system gave the time to organize and queue actions in a way that would make the flow of the battle a little more pleasant, while still being a RT with pauses combat system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, there's just a raging argument here where the grognards (=super-hardcore IE combat fans) argue that P:E combat is too static and not frantic enough (because of engagement) and feels COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from IWD and BG/2.  :biggrin:

 

Also, there is no prebuffing nor counterspelling in P:E.

 

Now: the general consensus is that beetles bite too hard in the current BB. This will likely change in the next one which is expected at any time. They have so much damage threshold bypass that you're better off fighting them naked -- armor will just slow you down without adding any protection. That's clearly wrong.

 

Re difficulty and learning curve, the BB is rather brutal since you jump in at level 4 (formerly 5) with a full party, and face off against enemies of that level. I'm sure the real thing will be much less so because you start alone or with 1-2 companions at level 1, so you'll have more time to ease yourself in.

 

You might want to check out this thread about BB fighting tips for newbies.

 

Also, there's no shame turning down the difficulty to Easy. The BB392 build is hard, and I'd say that Normal difficulty corresponds to Very Hard on most modern games and is IMO somewhat harder (because of the beetles) than IWD on Core Rules. I've been alternating between Hard and Normal with the different backer builds since the difficulty swings back and forth a quite a lot. Hard on BB392 is... pretty rough ATM.

  • Like 1

I have a project. It's a tabletop RPG. It's free. It's a work in progress. Find it here: www.brikoleur.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This must be bizzaro world, someone on the board is giving the game **** on account of it being too similar to IE games.

It's certainly an unorthodox take.

"Things are funny...are comedic, because they mix the real with the absurd." - Buzz Aldrin.

"P-O-T-A-T-O-E" - Dan Quayle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you can't.

Well that's unfortunate.

 

 

I generally don't think of these games as real time with pause, even though everyone calls them that. I think of them as asynchronous turn based with fast. Turn on the right combination of auto-pause options and pressing space bar isn't something you do to pause the game, it's something you do to tell the game to resume playing out until something needs a new order.

 

For this it's essential to have lots of auto-pause options.

And queuing will help reduce the number of pauses that happen, making the game flow better. Not just in terms of what the game is doing, but also what your brain is doing. It's easier to focus on one guy at a time than to always have your attention divided between six. With queuing I can tell the wizard to throw a fireball, then buff the party, then attack someone. Without queuing, I would probably plan that sequence out in my head anyway, but I'd then have to mentally keep track of it myself, and remember where I'm up to the next time the wizard needs an order.

 

Now if there are insufficient auto-pause options, you also have to actively monitor all party members to see when they finish their most recently assigned action, so you can manually pause to give them a new one, all while juggling six action queues in your head.

 

It's not as bad as I probably make it sound, but these two things really improve the flow of combat by a huge amount, without actually changing any combat mechanics.

Edited by BrainMuncher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can shift-queue actions.

 

 

 

I think of them as asynchronous turn based with fast

 

Uhhh

 

then Fighting Simulators and Warcraft 3 must be turn-based "with fast" (wtf is that), because they follow the same rules as PE's RTwP system.

Edited by Sensuki
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's an interesting info

The words freedom and liberty, are diminishing the true meaning of the abstract concept they try to explain. The true nature of freedom is such, that the human mind is unable to comprehend it, so we make a cage and name it freedom in order to give a tangible meaning to what we dont understand, just as our ancestors made gods like Thor or Zeus to explain thunder.

 

-Teknoman2-

What? You thought it was a quote from some well known wise guy from the past?

 

Stupidity leads to willful ignorance - willful ignorance leads to hope - hope leads to sex - and that is how a new generation of fools is born!


We are hardcore role players... When we go to bed with a girl, we roll a D20 to see if we hit the target and a D6 to see how much penetration damage we did.

 

Modern democracy is: the sheep voting for which dog will be the shepherd's right hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well action-queuing sounds cool; also, I'm glad to hear that those beetles are off the charts.

As for combat being too similar to IE, that's just my opinion, I get that it was a great selling point for most people. Just saying...

Edited by svartelric
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a matter of perspective really. What you focus on.

 

I just gave NWN and NWN2 a short whirl too, and from where I'm at P:E combat is waaaaaaaaay closer to the IE games than them. 

 

Also IWD2 is an IE game too, the last one in fact. I'll have to give that another spin as well; I have a hunch the combat might actually be pret-t-ty close to P:E because it has AOO's which are similar to engagement in many ways.

I have a project. It's a tabletop RPG. It's free. It's a work in progress. Find it here: www.brikoleur.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a matter of perspective really. What you focus on.

 

I just gave NWN and NWN2 a short whirl too, and from where I'm at P:E combat is waaaaaaaaay closer to the IE games than them. 

 

Also IWD2 is an IE game too, the last one in fact. I'll have to give that another spin as well; I have a hunch the combat might actually be pret-t-ty close to P:E because it has AOO's which are similar to engagement in many ways.

 

IWD2 has AOO:s? Because if it does, I literally never noticed. I've played through IWD2 twice and made it about halfway through a few times, and never did I notice anything like AOO:s or Engagement.

 

Do I have a case of the alzheimers?

Edited by Luckmann

t50aJUd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in all IE games and in NWN2, in closed spaces i always used chokepoints. i had 2 tanks, i set them to block the door or any space smal enough that no enemies could pass through and had the rest of the party stand back and use ranged weapons or spells. in PE the mechanics allow tanks to keep enemies off the rest of the team without having to look for a chokepoint and/or exploit the AI

The words freedom and liberty, are diminishing the true meaning of the abstract concept they try to explain. The true nature of freedom is such, that the human mind is unable to comprehend it, so we make a cage and name it freedom in order to give a tangible meaning to what we dont understand, just as our ancestors made gods like Thor or Zeus to explain thunder.

 

-Teknoman2-

What? You thought it was a quote from some well known wise guy from the past?

 

Stupidity leads to willful ignorance - willful ignorance leads to hope - hope leads to sex - and that is how a new generation of fools is born!


We are hardcore role players... When we go to bed with a girl, we roll a D20 to see if we hit the target and a D6 to see how much penetration damage we did.

 

Modern democracy is: the sheep voting for which dog will be the shepherd's right hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad, it doesn't. I thought it did since it's based on D&D3, and they're quite central to its combat.

I think Josh wanted them in, but they couldn't do it emo-emot-smug.gif

 

 

 

in all IE games and in NWN2, in closed spaces i always used chokepoints. i had 2 tanks, i set them to block the door or any space smal enough that no enemies could pass through and had the rest of the party stand back and use ranged weapons or spells. in PE the mechanics allow tanks to keep enemies off the rest of the team without having to look for a chokepoint and/or exploit the AI

 

Playing like that is super boring, and you could keep enemies off your backline in the IE games too. You just had to do it the RTS way (the fun way) rather than the herp derp move a guy here and have some stupid aggro mechanic make them attack him way.

Edited by Sensuki
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...