Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Dialogue Options Don't Really Do Anything

dialogue choice stats

  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21
nipsen

nipsen

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Norway
  • Steam:retroquark

Just a thought, if you have a reputation for deceit, doesn't that mean you are not actually very good at it? 

:D ..but guessing that even if the game keeps track of which way your face keeps turning, the game very deliberately won't comment on your reputation directly. I'd probably let the player open up extra dialogue eventually, for example. That you've grown so comfortable being a tremendous law-abiding zealot, that you can make great speeches about purifying unbelievers and sinners, while alluding to past events and very, very large piles of white ash, without falling over on the ground from laughing fits - that sort of thing.


  • Sonntam likes this

#22
Tartantyco

Tartantyco

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 787 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

Just a thought, if you have a reputation for deceit, doesn't that mean you are not actually very good at it? 

 

Yet, still there are politicians.


  • Suen, DCParry, GrinningReaper659 and 6 others like this

#23
DCParry

DCParry

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 395 posts
  • Location:Singapore
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

 

Just a thought, if you have a reputation for deceit, doesn't that mean you are not actually very good at it? 

 

Yet, still there are politicians.

 

 

Zing!


  • Lephys likes this

#24
ctn2003

ctn2003

    Lord Gil Wood of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 282 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

And theirs no low intelligence dialog as far as a can tell. witch a is a huge let down.


  • Sonntam likes this

#25
nipsen

nipsen

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Norway
  • Steam:retroquark

It's because it's a next generation game. People can be dumber than dirt but still talk up a pretty good speech. You know, like well trained parrots with script-writers. Very modern.


  • Mooch likes this

#26
InsaneCommander

InsaneCommander

    (12) Mage

  • Members
  • 1894 posts
  • Location:Drinking with Mirke in a Deadfire bar
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I really like the choices you made for the dialogue system, especially the personality traits. Some are a bit harder to figure out than others (for example, [passionate] is much more complex than the stereotypical [agressive] ), but overall they work very well I think.

 

One thing I noticed though is that sometimes dialogue options I choose don't disappear, they remain but are sort of greyed out. Choosing them again leads to the exact same answer as before. I know other games use mechanics like these to indicate that I've "asked this question before", but it's not quite consistent - other dialogue options disappear entirely after being chosen and I can't quite figure out the difference between the two types. Is this intentional? I'm also not quite sold on the remaining-but-greyed-out dialogue options, it just breaks immersion too much to be able to repeat the same line over and over with NPCs just playing along, instead of hitting you over the head with a pipe eventually.

I think they leave these options so that we can read the NPC's answers again if we don't remember what they said. But I agree with you, it's strange and immersion breaking.

 

It would be better if the greyed dialogue was hidden and we had to click somewhere to see it.



#27
GrinningReaper659

GrinningReaper659

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 247 posts
  • Location:U.S.
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

I'm very pleased to find that attribute-related options aren't "win conversation" buttons and that when I told that gentleman how unlikely I thought it that a woman would lie with him, he angrily told me there wasn't a right way to take such a statement. Good stuff.


  • Koth likes this

#28
Lephys

Lephys

    Punsmith of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 7245 posts
  • Location:The Punforge
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Just a thought, if you have a reputation for deceit, doesn't that mean you are not actually very good at it?


I guess always getting away with it, in the moment, doesn't mean that no one ever realizes what you've done afterwards. For example, if you keep convincing people you're someone else, they'll probably eventually find out you're not that person, but they still won't know exactly who you are.

Of course, then I guess you couldn't really develop that reputation. *shrug*. I guess they could describe you, unless you used elaborate disguises.

#29
CatatonicMan

CatatonicMan

    Imaginary Friend of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 105 posts
  • Location:Hobbs, NM, USA
  • Steam:CatatonicGinger [xNMT]
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Just a thought, if you have a reputation for deceit, doesn't that mean you are not actually very good at it? 

 

 

Anyways, I really like the system, but I wonder if it would be advantageous to have a personality "level up" for our characters at the start since we are level 5 and we would enter this area presumably with some personality points built up.

 

Not necessarily. For example, a lie that works in the short term might be obviously false in the long term. Also, betraying one person to another person would make a deceitful nature rather obvious to at least one of the involved parties.



#30
BLnoT

BLnoT

    Spacefiller of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 49 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Thank you for replying to the many questions Eric. We always appreciate when those involved in making the game can manage some time to reply on the forums.  Your comments have answered a few questions i had,  but never posted on. How the skill checks are applied in conversation in game etc.

I do agree and have posted on this before that i find myself looking at what type of skill check are required in a conversation rather than what i am actually saying. As a passionate character i would choose that option without paying too great a time with what that option is actually saying to the npc. A removal or disable ability to hide the skill check options i think would be helpful in immersing myself in the game/ better roleplay with my character.

 

One thing i absolutly loved about Fallout 2 was its diverse dialog options. To wait with anticipation how a particular npc would act/reply to the many and often humerious reply options. Being able to identify with the character on general conversation terms was usually more than enough to guess how a npc would react to the more exotic options which i think was a great way of immersion, creating a much stronger sense of empathy towards Npcs.

 

So thats a +1 for Hiding skill checks whilst in dialog.


Edited by BLnoT, 25 August 2014 - 06:43 AM.


#31
AdaMusic

AdaMusic

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 121 posts

 

 

...no woman would ever lay with someone ...


Leave it to the Codex to be the grammar nerds. I think this is supposed to be lie. I'm not sure if it's actual dialogue, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case.

 

Busted! No, was just a lazy post - not in the game.

 

Osvir, to your question, I don't have much say over the skill system other than how we do skill checks in dialogue. But our systems guys will be addressing all the beta feedback they can, so I'm sure it'll get evaluated. This kind of feedback is very useful to us - thanks for taking the time.

 

 

BTW can you tell the GUI team to add settings for GUI elements (like what you can see in dialogue, ingame combat, etc)?



#32
Ben007

Ben007

    Master Smith of the Obsidian Order

  • Initiates
  • 4 posts
  • Location:The Lone Star
  • Steam:KilrB
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

Thank you Eric.

 

I like what I am hearing about the conversations work and, so far, this is one of my favorite parts of the beta.



#33
Odd Hermit

Odd Hermit

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 643 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

All that said, if you find that some interaction really forces you to metagame to get the option you want, and requires you to act out-of-character, that's a serious narrative issue, so go ahead and report that as a bug. 

 

 

The main metagaming issue I have is that personality is a part of combat stats in such a way that it is very sub-par to take or not take Perception/Int/Resolve on some classes. I would've preferred personality traits be a bit more separate so that class choice doesn't dictate so much of my character's personality, if I want to build that class to be effective at the role I want anyway.

 

For example, if I am playing most caster classes there is very little reason to choose perception currently. It doesn't do anything that substantially improves those classes for their role outside of niche sub-par builds like a Skaen dual wielder.

 

Resolve is also a bit of a dud. All of my Druid, Cipher, Priest, Wizard builds right now have high Might, Intellect, and middling Dexterity. I knock a few points off Constitution, Perception, Resolve to achieve this. If I play any of these as my main I worry my character will be penalized in dialogue for being imperceptive and weak willed when those aren't necessarily aligning with the personality I'd want to play.

 

Right now the attribute effects don't feel that sensibly matched to their name anyway, if feels a bit like having the me attributes define combat capability and mental state was arbitrarily carried over from DnD.

 

 

Probably too late now I would've rather have something like a separate set of dialogue/personality-based strength/weaknesses and neutral ones with pro/cons, while for combat I'd be fine just picking increased AoE, duration, damage without them being packaged into attributes.


Edited by Odd Hermit, 20 March 2015 - 06:11 AM.

  • Luckmann and Bazy like this

#34
Sensuki

Sensuki

    Subway Apathist of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 9965 posts
  • Location:Australia
  • Steam:STEAM_0:1:1229809
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

If Perception gave +1 Accuracy, you would take it again.

Intellect is good on most classes, but not really the Ranger.



#35
Odd Hermit

Odd Hermit

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 643 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

If Perception gave +1 Accuracy, you would take it again.

Intellect is good on most classes, but not really the Ranger.

 

True(I'd stack it instead of dex probably) but it doesn't necessarily fix the issue.

 

Perhaps some people want to play an imperceptive character. Can you be accurate and not perceptive?  I'd think you can. Visual acuity and social perceptiveness are very different.

 

Then there's issues like might not really being strength, but in the beta it's used to push heavy things. :/

 

It'd just feel a lot less silly, and a lot more "clean", to me to just choose the combat strengths of a character separately.


Edited by Odd Hermit, 20 March 2015 - 06:27 AM.

  • Luz likes this

#36
Lephys

Lephys

    Punsmith of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 7245 posts
  • Location:The Punforge
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
This was always an issue, though. "I want to be strong and agile, but I don't want to have no charisma, even though charisma would come at the cost of some combat-supporting attributes."

*shrug*
  • Hassat Hunter and Doppelschwert like this

#37
Odd Hermit

Odd Hermit

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 643 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

This was always an issue, though. "I want to be strong and agile, but I don't want to have no charisma, even though charisma would come at the cost of some combat-supporting attributes."

*shrug*

 

If a game is mostly combat focused it doesn't make sense to sacrifice combat ability for the occasional dialogue option.
 

Plus some classes got away with good dialogue and combat ability. Sorcerers for example, with a Paladin dip for wtf saving throws.



#38
Lephys

Lephys

    Punsmith of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 7245 posts
  • Location:The Punforge
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
^ I agree, but what do you expect to occur without completely separating combat stats from non-combat stats?

I mean, you could do that, but then, how do you have checks for something like Strength or Dexterity? Do you have combat Dexterity, then non-combat Dexterity?

As a Wizard in D&D, I always enjoyed having pretty decent Strength, so that when we got into a bind and the Fighter or typical brute-force person was out cold, I could be surprisingly helpful by lifting debris, moving things, etc. It didn't really help me in combat much, so it was, in that context, a non-combat stat for me.

I'm just not sure how to design a stat system in which you don't have to give up a "roleplaying" (for lack of a better term) character aspect for sheer combat effectiveness at some point, or vice versa. You can't have EXCELLENT eyesight, but also be highly inaccurate in a fight. You can have high Perception and low Strength, but you can't be only-combat-good at something, while being non-combat terrible at it.

*shrug*. I guess this is where skills come in handy. You can be strong, but have absolutely no skill with a weapon whatsoever. Boom. You've got combat effectiveness potential, but the stat itself doesn't really lend itself to either combat or non-combat. That might be the best way to go. The stat is raw potential, and the skill is applied potential. As in, you could have amazing Perception, but that doesn't let you track an animal or aim a bow at a guy 100 yards away. You still need skill with tracking, and with archery.

#39
Voss

Voss

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 750 posts

In a system like this?  You treat the attributes as what they are (a spreadsheet of % modifiers to various things- personally I'd rather increment each of them directly rather than keep up the pretense), and you bind dialogue options to skills.  Lore instead of Int, Stealth instead of Dex, Athletics instead of Strength.  Some get a bit fuzzy, but since the game seems to treat mechanics as perception anyway (in terms of noticing traps and other hidden things), I'd go for that over survival.  You might need another skill or two, but the skills are a bit flat and lacking anyway, so could use more breadth as is.

 

 

Attributes are something of legacy mechanic anyway, kept around more out of habit than rationale.  Much to the detriment of the last two versions of D&D, which try to bind them directly to defenses as well (4th literally gives up and makes half of them dump stats for each class, and 5th just decrees that some saving throws are worth less than others).  You could easily map the effects of a strength bonus or perception bonus as a feat/talent/perk, but you'd have to give them out more often, or at least at level 1. .


  • Tamerlane and Odd Hermit like this

#40
Tamerlane

Tamerlane

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1125 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer

Death to ability scores.

 

(I fully recognize that there was a 0% chance Obsidian was going to make a game pitched as a successor to the IE games and not use both ability scores and a class system.)


Edited by Tamerlane, 20 March 2015 - 10:13 PM.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: dialogue, choice, stats

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users