Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Auxilius

Perks/Characters traits

Recommended Posts

Just a short thread to ask if perks and traits are going to be of a game and if they'll influence dialogues.

 

By the way, was there any thought for negative perks for the creation of the character? You know, to give him a little more personality and equilibrate the good perks you may also get from the start.

 

I believe they could really give meaning to dialogues since these would be ours exclusively. Especially if perks can be cumulated for extra-flavored lines in dialogues.

 

[Smartass] [Obsidian Fanboy] Too much work involved? Nah, as long as there is talent, everything is possible.

Edited by Auxilius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IIRC, there will be talents which are analogues of 3.X/PF feats. No word yet on traits, but the character background may take the place, sort of like Arcanum.


"Take your child murderin' god and shove his him up his own ass."-Volorun

 

"...the vote of a black redhead disabled homosexual transsexual Jew should probably be worth the same as at least a hundred white heterosexual Christians."-Rostere

 

"i can think of many women i would gladly sleep with, but not a single one that i would want as a girlfriend/wife... neither real nor fictional."-teknoman2

 

"I'm all for killing dogs in film." - algroth

 

"Iselmyr is the one who did GOMAD... Aloth is lactose intolerant" -ShadySands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to see negative and positive traits in the game; negatives can be fun for full party creation.

 

Character backgrounds like Arcanum would be awesome. Those kinds of trade-offs can add a lot of diversity to builds or just add flavor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every trait that effects dialogue may represent a large addition to the game development cost because all of those conversation trees need to be written. It's likely much cheaper to implement elements like skill modifiers.


"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could care less if every little character detail effects dialogue; although it would be cool to have, it just doesn't seem realistic ever. Too much to handcraft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it really would cost that much since I believe it would just branch out a little before going back to the main tree.

I hope not at least. It would give that feeling your run is unique.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Josh remarked on the topic of "negative traits" in another thread in which we were talking heavily about it. I'm gonna go try to hunt it down now, but I seem to recall him saying that they definitely weren't doing isolated negatives/flaws that you can pick from, but that he wasn't against flaws attached to benefits (a la Fallout, sort of).

 

So, I dunno how prevalent they'll be, but I'd bet we'll see some "this'll make you slower, but you'll also attack harder" type stuff (just to use a simple-yet-not-necessarily-awesome example).

 

*EDIT*

 

Found it!:

 

I like virtue/flaw systems, especially in classless systems.  I could see them working in PoE, but they would be out of scope for this game.  Sorry.

So, yeah... he likes that sort of thing, but apparently independent strengths and flaws don't really fit the rest of PoE's design. So, hopefully we'll still see the detriments attached to benefits in certain perks/traits.

Edited by Lephys
  • Like 1

Should we not start with some Ipelagos, or at least some Greater Ipelagos, before tackling a named Arch Ipelago? 6_u

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it really would cost that much since I believe it would just branch out a little before going back to the main tree.

I hope not at least. It would give that feeling your run is unique.

 

Possibly, if the only thing it impacted were emergent game play elements like your reputation scores. Branches to the plot line would likely be much more expensive.


"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade-offs are fine; negatives are really only useful from a roleplaying perspective. Trade-offs are usually much more interesting (assuming they are not just simple stat changes).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind DLC composed of only backgrounds / traits influenced dialogue trees, if that's too much to pull off on release.

Sounds crazy right? Don't think anyone has ever tried that before.

 

I know. It won't happen.


"There are no good reasons. Only legal ones." - Ross Scott

 It's not that I'm lazy. I just don't care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...