Jump to content

Raw experience, or experience that scales with your level?


Raw experience, or experience scaled to player level?  

92 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you prefer encounters give a static amount of experience, or that experience scales depending on your level?

    • Scaling experience (rats give no exp at level 10, don't bother)
      29
    • Static experience (Rats always give 10 exp)
      63


Recommended Posts

It depends how you think of XP, killing a rat at level 10 might seem like it doesn't offer any new experience but you could ask yourself why you need to kill a rat at level 10. Perhaps the reason for your action is what provides the XP.

 

At level 1 I kill rats because the Innkeeper needs his cellar cleaned out and its about all I can manage, at level 10 I kill rats because the Lord I'm looking to get a job from wants me to kill rats.

 

Either way I still learned something worthy of XP, at level 1 I learned some combat, at level 10 I learned Lords are ****.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ever-increasing experience requirements for additional levels naturally makes the "x" experience received for the most basic enemies irrelevant. When it takes you 30,000 exp to level up, 10 might as well be the same as 0. On the other hand, from a believably standpoint, after your first 3-odd rats you should be pretty much a master rat-smasher and no longer learn anything about the practice until you encounter the rat king.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ever-increasing experience requirements for additional levels naturally makes the "x" experience received for the most basic enemies irrelevant. When it takes you 30,000 exp to level up, 10 might as well be the same as 0. On the other hand, from a believably standpoint, after your first 3-odd rats you should be pretty much a master rat-smasher and no longer learn anything about the practice until you encounter the rat king.

except I'm not a rat smasher, I'm a fighter. So I still practice swinging my axe when I swing it at a rat. Not much, but a little.

Edited by ogrezilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since -according to my understanding at least- PE isn't suposed to become some kind of open world behemoth like the TES games, I firmly believe in a static solution. It should be fairly easy for the devs to predict at what level(s) a player is going to get to what content so keeping it static should not pose much of a balancing challenge (at least for regular play... I wouldn't seriously want to be the one balancing that hardcore permadeath stuff TBH ;) ).

If the game had "true" 360° freedom then scaling encounters to a certain degree would seem like the more viable approach but since PE will at the most probably offer BG-like "open" world exploration, I think that static will simply make more sense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scaling is basically always bad. This time around it's useless, because we will surely have that we need more and more exp to gain a level, so killing a rat at lvl 10 is pretty meaningless already. Mixing in scaling makes it more complicated to balance imo. I also get annoyed when I have to fight monsters that don't yield nearly anything, it's just such a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scaling is basically always bad. This time around it's useless, because we will surely have that we need more and more exp to gain a level, so killing a rat at lvl 10 is pretty meaningless already. Mixing in scaling makes it more complicated to balance imo. I also get annoyed when I have to fight monsters that don't yield nearly anything, it's just such a waste of time.

 

that's the point. don't take a quest that's a cake walk when the harder quest will yield the extra experience to cover what was lost not killing the easy monsters. Give players the option to ignore easy quests - unlike BG where you feel the need to take every quest that comes along to ensure you get all the exp to level that you can. The experience it takes to level there scales, but teters off once you reach level 20 so you don't level so irregularly that there's no more sense of progression. If you just have exponentially increasing markers for experience, you end up making player progression come to a halt or start giving out insane numbers for experience for level equivalent challenges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I don't think we'll be getting experience for kills ?

 

Wait.... I thought I read something about this too.... somewhere. Anyone have a cite? Or maybe it was just an idea Josh was tossing around?

The KS Collector's Edition does not include the Collector's Book.

Which game hook brought you to Project Eternity and interests you the most?

PE will not have co-op/multiplayer, console, or tablet support (sources): [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Write your own romance mods because there won't be any in PE.

"But what is an evil? Is it like water or like a hedgehog or night or lumpy?" -(Digger)

"Most o' you wanderers are but a quarter moon away from lunacy at the best o' times." -Alvanhendar (Baldur's Gate 1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I don't think we'll be getting experience for kills ?

 

Wait.... I thought I read something about this too.... somewhere. Anyone have a cite? Or maybe it was just an idea Josh was tossing around?

 

It was a vaguely worded comment about non-combat skills, that was later clarified. Xp/kill is present.

 

I voted static xp, sliding scale levels achieves the same effect, so this is squaring the complexity, with no real benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I don't think we'll be getting experience for kills ?

 

Wait.... I thought I read something about this too.... somewhere. Anyone have a cite? Or maybe it was just an idea Josh was tossing around?

 

Tim Cain said it in the first reddit Q&A if I recall? "We aren't going to reward you for your body count" or some such.

 

EDIT:

 

Correction, I think it was actually his first video update

 

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/obsidian/project-eternity/posts/314089

Edited by nikolokolus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I don't think we'll be getting experience for kills ?

 

Wait.... I thought I read something about this too.... somewhere. Anyone have a cite? Or maybe it was just an idea Josh was tossing around?

 

Tim Cain said it in the first reddit Q&A if I recall? "We aren't going to reward you for your body count" or some such.

 

EDIT:

 

Correction, I think it was actually his first video update

 

http://www.kickstart...ty/posts/314089

I think they meant that killing wouldn't be the only way to get xp. not that killing wouldn't give xp.

 

Thanks. Ah, I see, it was just tangentially alluded to, but probably not what he meant on its face. A few ways to interpret that, so I'll just leave it alone...

 

 

It was a vaguely worded comment about non-combat skills, that was later clarified. Xp/kill is present.

 

I voted static xp, sliding scale levels achieves the same effect, so this is squaring the complexity, with no real benefit.

 

Right, I was thinking of scaling mob xp in relation to more static level requirements, so it makes sense alone, but loses value when taken together with other mechanics. Assuming PE will be using that model where higher levels require more and more xp, then this is a bit redundant..

The KS Collector's Edition does not include the Collector's Book.

Which game hook brought you to Project Eternity and interests you the most?

PE will not have co-op/multiplayer, console, or tablet support (sources): [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Write your own romance mods because there won't be any in PE.

"But what is an evil? Is it like water or like a hedgehog or night or lumpy?" -(Digger)

"Most o' you wanderers are but a quarter moon away from lunacy at the best o' times." -Alvanhendar (Baldur's Gate 1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think it matters either way - ultimately the devs will balance the game so that you start out on level x and end up around level y (plus or minus depending on amount of optional content you do) by the end. Some people may be in the school of thought that it is more realistic and enhances immersion to have experience scaling, which does make sense from a learning perspective.

 

Keep in mind that the devs have hinted that they may be providing experience rewards based on objective so that fighting enemies or persuading them or sneaking past are equal in terms of experience reward.

 

If exp per enemy defeated is in I would opt to have it hidden from the player, thus this becomes a non-issue.

 

Edit: If xp/kill is in and there are also options for getting xp without killing, doesnt this lead to the inevitable scenario where a player takes a non-combat route, gets the xp, then goes back and kills all the enemies and gets essentially double the amount of xp. The devs have also expressed they want to avoid this scenario, it will be interesting to see how they go about fulfilling these requirements.

Edited by sollus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

static for me.

the 10xp i get for a rat are a blessing in the begining, when i need 500xp to get from lv1 to lv2, but when im lv19 and need 320k xp to go to lv20, that 10 xp are meaningless anyway so i wont bother killing the rat

Edited by teknoman2

The words freedom and liberty, are diminishing the true meaning of the abstract concept they try to explain. The true nature of freedom is such, that the human mind is unable to comprehend it, so we make a cage and name it freedom in order to give a tangible meaning to what we dont understand, just as our ancestors made gods like Thor or Zeus to explain thunder.

 

-Teknoman2-

What? You thought it was a quote from some well known wise guy from the past?

 

Stupidity leads to willful ignorance - willful ignorance leads to hope - hope leads to sex - and that is how a new generation of fools is born!


We are hardcore role players... When we go to bed with a girl, we roll a D20 to see if we hit the target and a D6 to see how much penetration damage we did.

 

Modern democracy is: the sheep voting for which dog will be the shepherd's right hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Static XP. It evens out in the end anyhow, as while 10 XP means something to begin with, after a few levels it begins to mean very little. I've never really liked the idea that you reach a point where killing, say, a goblin gains you nothing whatsoever -- it may not be a particularly skillful foe, but it does still require some technique and fight to kill, so it makes sense to me that it should gain you at least some experience. That even moreso with tougher opponents that also eventually slide to gaining you nothing with a scaling XP system.

knightofchaoss.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no rats.

Only bandits and monsters that lost little of their deadliness regardless of player level.

 

Fair enough. Wolves? (j/k) I would argue that any field-seasoned adventurer will be able to dispatch enemies of less experience more easily than they would some seasons prior to the encounter. Unless what you want is enemy encounter scaling.

 

Not really. What I want is a conservative power progression. Ho HP inflation. Proper battle mechanics where numbers and flanking do make a big deal. AI that fights at least somewhat intelligently.

That way, no matter what level you are, the lvl1 bandits won't ever become an afterthought. tehy will still be able ot deliver a world of hurt upon you if you're not carefull.

 

 

And no, I don't really care much for killing wolves. Leave the poor wolves alone.

* YOU ARE A WRONGULARITY FROM WHICH NO RIGHT CAN ESCAPE! *

Chuck Norris was wrong once - He thought HE made a mistake!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

XP per encounter (my best choice however is XP only for doing quests), not per monster/enemy, so scalable encounter equals to scalable experience.

 

If it's done like Baldur's Gate

 

Extra enemies = extra XP

A Greater Mummy yields more XP than a Mummy

Edited by Sensuki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two cents: If xp scaling is used, it should only be for enemies, not for quests. I hate doing quests in games (like Borderlands) and not getting jack for it since I'm too high level. I'm pretty sure this thread has been focusing on xp/kill, but I wanted to throw that out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two cents: If xp scaling is used, it should only be for enemies, not for quests. I hate doing quests in games (like Borderlands) and not getting jack for it since I'm too high level. I'm pretty sure this thread has been focusing on xp/kill, but I wanted to throw that out there.

 

Obsidian did say that they wouldn't award for "body count," which implies they won't award for only kills and/or the main bulk of xp is coming from quests, or something. I'm curious how they're going to balance things out between level/xp/questing, but I'm sure Obsidian will look for something fair---they have a lot of experience by now.

The KS Collector's Edition does not include the Collector's Book.

Which game hook brought you to Project Eternity and interests you the most?

PE will not have co-op/multiplayer, console, or tablet support (sources): [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Write your own romance mods because there won't be any in PE.

"But what is an evil? Is it like water or like a hedgehog or night or lumpy?" -(Digger)

"Most o' you wanderers are but a quarter moon away from lunacy at the best o' times." -Alvanhendar (Baldur's Gate 1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a pleasure to play Drakensang game, where there was great implementation of your suggestion, when party killed lets say Giant Spider for a first time, they was rewarded by fittingly huge amount of XPs, yet after getting more of these slain the XP reward was lesser because party got more used to this type of enemy. Which simply meant that with higher skill became killing known enemies rutinous and less rewarding, which was a nice touch and I loved the idea and I would not mind to see something similar in PE.

Edited by Ywerion

"Have you ever spoken with the dead? Called to them from this side? Called them from their silent rest? Do you know what it is that they feel?

Pain. Pain, when torn into this wakefulness, this reminder of the chaos from which they had escaped. Pain of having to live! There will be no more pain. There will be... no more chaos."

 

 

Kerghan the Terrible,

first of the Necromancers,

voyager in the Lands of the Dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...