Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
The year's half over...
Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:29 AM
A new batch of CPUs is baked. A sample of them are tested to see what performance they have. Some headroom is left for safety. The Core2Duo line is remarkable for its HUGE headroom ... lots of room for overclock due to a very conservative clockspeed set by Intel.
Also, if a batch of high-end CPUs, say the Core2Duo Extreme Edition E6700, fails to be reliable at a given speed, they are branded at a lower speed, say the E6320.
Overclocking, via the BIOS on the motherboard and all handled in software these days, allows the direct control of the voltage across the component (CPU in this case), as well as the multiplier and base frequency configurations ... all of which combine to give the final speed of the CPU.
Case in point: the E6320 has two cores, both of which are clocked at 1.86GHz. In their test published in the current issue, Custom PC overvolted the CPU to 1.525V to raise the clock speed to 2.8GHz. This is faster than the stock speed of the fastest Core2Duo on the market, the E6700, which runs at 2.66GHz.
Pumping more power through a CPU may cause it to lose some longevity (what do you do with your ten-year-old CPUs?), but the main side-effect is a higher power bill and more waste heat, hence the need for good cooling to overclock further. (Some people like to indulge in extreme overclocking, using liquid nitrogen and attempting to see how fast they can clock the CPU for one safe boot of Windows at a time, for example: speeds of 10GHz have been achieved.)
Posted 22 June 2007 - 07:53 AM
You don't need to be as savvy about overclocking as various online reviewers can be. For example you could simply OC your CPU and leave it at that. Games like NWN2 are more reliant on a fast video card, so for them it can be helpful to OC the GPU. Memory overclocking (System and GPU) isn't something for the average user to worry about because you stand to gain maybe 2% or 3% performance. It's better to buy plenty of fast memory to begin with. If you know how to OC your memory, great. Otherwise it's no big loss.
Edited by Wistrik, 22 June 2007 - 08:16 AM.
Posted 22 June 2007 - 09:45 PM
Overclocking is apparently the way of the future. Since I already use third party solutions to keep my computers running cool, I'm an excellent candidate for overclocking anyhow.
I'll look into the fan and whatnot, but I'm still going to stay focused on the Motherboard, CPU, and video card. Those always seem like the core elements to me. That doesn't mean I'll skimp on the rest, of course. I want to get the best system within the budget I've set for myself. Still, as important as the PSU is, it doesn't require the same amount of soul-searching before purchase.
Posted 23 June 2007 - 05:56 AM
It draws 795W to produce its 650W, making it 82% efficient, and it has three 12V rails rated: 12V¹ @ 28Amps, 12V² @ 28Amps, and 12V³ @ 30Amps.
It's a bit longer than most PSUs, so it won't fit in a tiny case, though it does have a speed-variable fan and supports CoolGuard (a circuit that keeps the fans spinning for a few minutes after the PC is shut down, to bleed off excess heat and improve component longevity).
Posted 13 July 2007 - 08:35 AM
Posted 13 July 2007 - 07:32 PM
Posted 13 July 2007 - 07:39 PM
What mobo are you going to get? I personally like the Asus Blitz
I might actually get one of those quad cores in July if the prices are right. I tend to like to wait until at least Mid-October before I begin builds, but I can always make an exception this year. Probably not, but you never know. Anyhow, I have to go to Frye's (or however it's spelled) sometime before the end of this month anyhow. I'll take a look at stuff then.
Posted 13 July 2007 - 07:49 PM
Posted 13 July 2007 - 08:15 PM
Posted 13 July 2007 - 08:20 PM
Edit: annihilated a typo.
Edit2: I'm also interested in what Penryn has to offer. I like some of AMD's new designs in "Barcelona", but it seems they're having some trouble. I'll wait for head-to-head reviews before I make a final CPU decision.
Edited by Wistrik, 13 July 2007 - 08:30 PM.
Posted 15 July 2007 - 10:01 AM
Go for the quads, Bok. It'll be just like Freelancer. Chain gun power.
Or you can wait for the Penryn Quads, I feel they are going to make the Kentsfield-based Core 2 Quads look like Pentium Ds.
Edited by jaguars4ever, 15 July 2007 - 10:02 AM.
Posted 15 July 2007 - 10:07 AM
Posted 27 July 2007 - 08:54 AM
Posted 27 July 2007 - 08:05 PM
Intel Penryn Quad or Octacore
1 9800 GTX, and get the second later
4 gig RAM
Intel-based PCI Express 2.0 compiant mobo /w SLI
SoundBlaster X-Fi 2
30-inch monitor 2560x1600 rez!!
I can't name specific parts or prices cuz everything is just rumors, and I'm about to install Vista 64 so I'll be getting 4-gig RAM soon
Edited by Bokishi, 27 July 2007 - 08:06 PM.
Posted 14 August 2007 - 09:59 PM
Now, I was thinking either:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 Kentsfield 2.66GHz 2 x 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 Conroe 3.0GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor
for the CPU. I don't want to spend the extra cash for the quad unless it will really make a difference. It is, after all, more expensive by over 200 bucks.
As far as MBs go, I was thinking:
mkreku's suggestiong: ABIT IP35 Pro LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard, which doesn't look bad
tried and true asus: Open Box: ASUS P5K3 DELUXE/WIFI-AP LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard. I just don't care for the wifi. I have a cabled lan and I don't intend to change that anytime soon, even after setting up several secure wireless lans over the last few years. I'm old fashioned that way.
BFG Tech BFGR88768GTXOCE GeForce 8800GTX 768MB 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card
ASUS EN8800GTX/HTDP/768M GeForce 8800GTX 768MB 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card
Of course, the video cards are pricey, but the big news for me is that one of my CPU choices is actually more expensive than either video card option.
As always, nothing is set in stone until I purchase, which will likely be sometime between now and November. I want the system up and running before December. I appreciate any particular insight you folks might have. Anything from finding real alternatives that cost less money to switches in brand names for performance or reliability.
I stopped by Fry's today and looked at the prices. They seem comparable to New Egg, but I also find that they don't always have the exact same products. Once I get the big three set, I'll look into the other components, such as memory, PSU, heatsinks, etc.
Posted 14 August 2007 - 11:00 PM
Posted 14 August 2007 - 11:22 PM
It stands up surprisingly well! Since your purchase isn't scheduled until at the latest November (by which time the AMD Phenom should have arrived) you'll be able to choose from Penryn (Intel's new LGA775 socket CPU's.. meaning you can buy the motherboard now) and Phenom, if you decide to wait a few months longer.
Decisions, decisions. Since I already have a LGA775 socket motherboard, I'm waiting for the new Penryn before I upgrade. Unless I switch to Abit's new DDR3-enabled motherboard.. Argh.
Posted 15 August 2007 - 12:02 AM
Posted 15 August 2007 - 09:18 PM
Where are some of the other regulars? Angshuman? Enoch? More opinions, please. Thanks to Bok and mkreku for the ideas. My latest cost test included evga for both the mobo and video.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users