ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 13, 2006 Share Posted December 13, 2006 I think i like the PT more because of all of its new graphics and all of its hidden backstory that you'll have to cath watching one of the mivies a second or third time around. :joy: POST YOUR VOTES!!! :joy: IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Mortis Posted December 13, 2006 Share Posted December 13, 2006 I have to go with the original trilogy, I'm old enough to have seen Jedi at the cinema and grew up watching the other two films on TV at Christmas. Not that I dislike the new films.....ok, maybe Clones was rubbish in my opinion but *Shrugs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 13, 2006 Author Share Posted December 13, 2006 Yea clones was really pointless. Although it did explain where the stormtroopers came from, but i think the whole fighting droids is annoying. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xard Posted December 13, 2006 Share Posted December 13, 2006 PT= Horrible OT= Gold How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego Varen Posted December 13, 2006 Share Posted December 13, 2006 Both are good, but I'm not sure. I've been watching the Prequel Trilogy more at the moment, but I've seen all of them. So, I'm not sure which to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 13, 2006 Author Share Posted December 13, 2006 I like PT but then again OT has that magical feeling liek your watching something new everytime IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purgatorio Posted December 13, 2006 Share Posted December 13, 2006 ... To be honest, I umm am not a great fan of either. :"> *Stands in corner of shame* S.A.S.I.S.P.G.M.D.G.S.M.B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogo Ribeiro Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 I've just purchased a special edition of the original trilogy while sidestepping the recent titles that were available. Guess that counts as a vote of sorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 I hate prequels. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 14, 2006 Author Share Posted December 14, 2006 I just wanted to see what every one thinks b/c ususally in forums OT vs. PT arguements sprout and i felt like making a poll just for that reason. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Mortis Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 This is just a guess, but I'd bet that which trilogy you like would have something to do with age. Older peeps probably go for the OT, younger peeps for the prequals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 14, 2006 Author Share Posted December 14, 2006 I guess you're right. As far as it goes, when the OT came out that was "new" to the older folks and when the PT came out it was "new" for the youger ones and "same ol' - same ol'" for the older audience. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorth Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 You forgot a trilogy... The Theatrical version of the OT vs. the mutilated version of the OT. I voted OT anyway because even a bad OT has very little or no Hayden Christensen in it. The worst blight to hit the silver screens in a decade. “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 This is just a guess, but I'd bet that which trilogy you like would have something to do with age. Older peeps probably go for the OT, younger peeps for the prequals. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It has nothing to do with that to me. I hate prequels in general. You start the story at its starting point. If you use a flashbacks heavily that often means you need to start the story earlier. It is basic story telling 101. You start at the beginning where the story and characters are relevant and move on from there. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krookie Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 I don't really like Star Wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSI: Nihilus Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Are you ready for an intense Lightsaber duel? Are you ready for a heated battle on Geonosis? Then I think you should watch PT. | RP Fic: Knightfall | RP: Knightfall: The duel between Light and Dark | Savoir, conqueror, hero, villian...You're all those things...--Emperor Skywalker to CSI, redeemed Darth Nihilus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Stories are meant to go forward, not backwards. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purgatorio Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Upwards, not downwards. S.A.S.I.S.P.G.M.D.G.S.M.B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam13n Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 The Original Trilogy: A New Hope; short, not many different scenes, but cool, the battle over the death star still ranks high today, even without the digital advancements. The Empire Strikes Back; great twist at the end, luke's battle with vader in itself was good, luke's early training, and the battle of hoth (I know I'm going in reverse) were all awesome. Return of the Jedi; rancor, pit of carcoon, the battle of endor, luke vs vader II, the final destruction of the death star and the emperor. Cool. The Prequel Trilogy: Phantom Menace; maul vs qui-gon and obi-wan was cool, the pod race was annoying, and way too long, anakin , r2's award ceremony was pathetic, JAR JAR F'IN BINKS Attack of the Clones: all the battles ruled, in my opinion, shame about anakin, he comes off as a whiny p*ssy. MORE JAR JAR GRRRRRRRR. Revenge of the Sith: the battles were again cool, as was dooku's death. Windu's death however, kinda sucked. The jedi purge was a bit weak, they are jedi after all, they should have seen it coming. Padme's death was weak as well, and kind of screwed up the fact that leia say's that she remembers her mother. The one major failing was that they didn't kill off JAR JAR... In all the original trilogy is better, still has the same magic even now, decades later, can you say that the prequel trilogy will do the same, I think not. Sure it looked cool, but so much of it was lame. Vader becomes the lord of the sith because he misses his mummy, and he's an overbearing, overconfident wuss who can't keep a lightsaber in one peice for more that 5 minutes. My overall decision is fairly unanimous - The Original Trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt Posted December 14, 2006 Author Share Posted December 14, 2006 Well OT is winning, but now as more and more people are posting the reasons why OT is better and why PT is better it seems les and less relevant of you age to which trilogy you like more. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Break glass to get hammer, use hammer to get rock, rock beats scissors, scissors cuts the yarn, cat plays with the yarn, use cat for protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyCrimson Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Saw the all 3 originals in the theater. They're definitely dated in terms of visual appeal, and imo at least, only Alec Guiness and Harrison Ford stand the test of time acting-wise, but I like the stories and characters much better...so the OT gets my vote. “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego Varen Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 I've just noticed a mistake in the Poll. It says Return of the Sith. It needs to be corrected to Revenge of the Sith, but I doubt us normal members can edit polls. Perhaps the Mods can though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyCrimson Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 (edited) Done. Edit: @ ThEvIlLiAgEiDiOt - hope you don't mind. My aged eyes thought Diego was the poll originator and that he was making a request. :"> Edited December 14, 2006 by LadyCrimson “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego Varen Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 Done. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks LadyCrimson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted December 14, 2006 Share Posted December 14, 2006 I prefer the one that isn't a blight in the annals of movie making. "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.ce846aae50e732dc4985eb712252381f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now