Jump to content

Dunno if I should start the game without the DLCs... are the DLCs integrated to the whole experience or separate ?


Recommended Posts

They are integrated. You can go to the DLC areas and return to the main game at (almost) any time. I personally would start with all DLCs installed (if you are planning to buy/play them anyway). Beast of Winter is really good, Forgotten Sanctum is also nice. Seeker, Slayer, Survivor is mostly a battle arena (with a story and quests). I liked it but it's focused on combat and thus it might not be everybody's cup of tea. 

Deadfire Community Patch: Nexus Mods

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Boeroer said:

They are integrated. You can go to the DLC areas and return to the main game at (almost) any time. 

I don't think that's quite what @FreyaMaluk meant by integrated.

I take integrated to mean "a part of the main story, so not having them and then installing them later will make you miss out on the experience in part or whole."

 

To that respect, I think Beast of Winter is "integrated" solely in the sense that if you do it at too high of a level, it might be too trivial because it doesn't scale up in difficulty as much as the others, and you'll miss out on Vatnir for a long time (the only companion [really "sidekick"] from a DLC). FS and SSS can still be challenges at level 20 (FS especially) and there's nothing as integral to the game experience as a companion in those so those are much more stand-alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - I thought integrated meant that the DLCs do get inserted into the main game - and not take place after the finished main story line (see BG2->Throne of Bhaal and such).  

Deadfire Community Patch: Nexus Mods

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little late. I played this game for the first time this year.  I tried first without the DLCs.  The history added by them are almost irrelevant for the main campaign.  Two of them have an impact with extra options at the end (one being very similar to that [in]famous Mass Effect 3 DLC ) . However, the resources that you can get from the DLCs make more easy the preparation for the  mega-bosses encounters.

In short, I would recommend play first without the expansions and then add them to see what they truly added to the experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're integrated, as in you play them by finding new locations in the main game once the DLC is installed. They're not separate like, say, the Far Cry DLCs where it's a separate adventure set on Mars or whatever

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may not know what you mean exactly with "Integrated", but I suggest you play with DLCs on if you already have ones.

From my point of view, these DLCs are meant to be played before you finish the main story -- unlike PoE 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why unlike PoE1? There it's the same: you cannot play the DLCs after the main game since there's no return from jumping into the pit in Twin Elms which leads to the endgame.

Deadfire Community Patch: Nexus Mods

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Boeroer said:

Why unlike PoE1? There it's the same: you cannot play the DLCs after the main game since there's no return from jumping into the pit in Twin Elms which leads to the endgame.

Maybe I remember it wrong. Please accept my apology.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...