media and politicians has done a terrible job educating folks regarding what mueller were seeming trying to find and likely to find.
legal insufficient for conspiracy doesn't surprise us, but am hopeful we get full report to see the extent to which trump attempted to obstruct, whether is enough to get convictions or not.
HA! Good Fun!
(1) it was certainly directed to promote or incite imminent lawless action, it specifically included targets to hit in follow up attacks.
(2) the only argument is the likelihood of it happening.
and still with the poor reading comprehension. sheesh. is not just likelihood o' happening. is likelihood successful incitement will happen essential immediate 'pon reading. we stressed imminent multiple times.
manifesto censorship is an auto-fail for US government in every example to come before courts, and there has been more than one. imagine a successful situation is difficult as it likely requires a degree o' viewpoint discrimination, which is particular difficult for government to pull off successful. some kinda religious cult leader exhorting his followers to immediate violence via an internet manifesto posting? might result in allowable censorship, but is doubly difficult to achieve such censorship 'cause is focusing not just on possible impact o' message, but necessitates differentiation 'cause o' kind and quality o' message.
Edited by Gromnir, 24 March 2019 - 01:08 PM.