Jump to content

Terminator

Members
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Terminator

  1.  

    Battlefield 4 you can play that if you want to experience war.

    Ummm what?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_4

    "Battlefield 4 is a first-person shooter video game developed by video game developer EA DICE and published by Electronic Arts. It is a sequel to 2011's Battlefield 3 and was released in October 2013 for Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360; then later in November for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.

    Battlefield 4 was met with positive reception. It was praised for its multiplayer mode, gameplay and graphics, but was also criticized for its short and shallow single-player campaign mode, and for its numerous bugs and glitches. It was a commercial success, selling over 7 million copies.[4]

     

    Battlefield 4's multiplayer contains three playable factions—the United States, China, and Russia—fighting against each other, in up to 64-player matches on PC, PlayStation 4, and Xbox One (24-Player on Xbox 360 and PS3).

    "

    Well still selling. I have played through Battlefield 3 and was thinking of buying Battlefield 4 very cheaply together with my friend this year. I am also going to buy Pillars of Eternity 2.

  2.  

     

     

    But would USA declare war to China, if China takes away Taiwan's and Hong Kong's autonomies and taking direct control over lots of world's electronic manufacturing or if China takes over Senkaku Islands and builds their military base there in order to make it easier to strike to Japan there, or if China increases their naval power South China sea and so on?  And what would Australia do if China threatens to block their imports and exports?

     

    Meaning that China and USA don't need to go in full on war in order to have fight over things that effect big economical and political impacts.

     

    Interesting discussing. I dont think China will conquer Japan you greatly underestimate Japan. Japan dont even need USA to defend vs China. Australia would likely make their BETA military alliance with Japan to full military alliance if China will harass them. Australia is not a poor country. I am sure they can increase the military budget if the demand rises and Japan is constantly increasing military budget already.

     

    Hong Kong? Their autonomy is already taken away step by step and there is nothing you can do about that unless you want to start a war with China and nobody wants to attack China based on whatever happens in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is doomed anyway its fate is sealed and it is doomed.

     

    Taiwan? Taiwan is an interesting chapter. History goes that communists stayed in mainland and nationalists moved to Taiwan. Taiwan has been very stubborn in resisting main land China. Regarding Taiwan future I find it very hard to predict for some reason don't know why Taiwan seems to do better then say Hong Kong with China mainland authorities.

     

    Taiwan is so much resisting so I would not sign out the possibility of civil war Taiwan vs mainland. I think they mainly try diplomacy.

     

    If China tries to take Taiwan by force there will be war and Taiwan hates China:

     

     

     

    Yes China can go have their wargames with Taiwan that would result in massive military casualties to China mainland and a destroyed Taiwan not a great way to improve China economy and in the aftermath there can be lingering guerilla warfare with terror attacks from pissed of Taiwanese people who have lost the war.

     

     

    Who speak about China conquering Japan? China has now for quite long time wanted to build military bases closer to Japan in order to have more military threat towards them.  If you think that Taiwanese or Japanese hate China that is quite mild comparison to hate which lots of Chinese feel towards Japan, because of what Japanese did for Chinese in WW2. It is historical issue that still causes lots of disputes between China and Japan. If you look Finnish attitudes towards Russians and then increase disdain/hate by ten folds you may get picture of how lots of Chinese feels about Japanese.

     

     In war between Japan and China, China would eventually win because of it fast larger resources (over 10x more people, much more natural resources, much more factories and other production facilities, larger capacity to produce ships, air planes and missiles. And not vulnerable to total aerial and naval blockade), but if China actually tried to conquer Japan, that war would end in usage of nuclear weapons which would make whole thing pointless. So there is quite low change that such war will ever happen in any other form than in form of a cold war.

     

    In war between China and Taiwan, China would most likely just blockade Taiwan and force it surrender by bombarding it if outside forces don't come to help Taiwan. China lets currently Taiwan keep its partially recognized state (Taiwan isn't currently fully independent country because China claims sovereignty over, which makes diplomatic relations with Taiwan quite complicated, which is why only 20 countries actually recognize Taiwan as country) because they don't want jeopardize their trade and other agreements with other countries, but that attitude would change if USA broke one of those agreements for example by attacking to NK. Also Taiwan's stubbornness to resist China isn't necessary in magnitudes that you think, because there are big sunk of Taiwanese who actually want Taiwan to become part of China (20-30% in polls but under actual military threat it could rise or lower somewhat).

     

    Yeah, China taking over by force Taiwan and Honk Kong and other territories it wants would hurt its economy and foreign relationships, which is why they have not done so, but even though economy is big factor in political decision it isn't only one, which is why we even talk about USA's possible strike/war with NK. Or why we, rest of EU and USA have several kinds of sanctions towards Russia. Why we have trade restrictions towards China and lots of other countries which human rights situations we don't approve. Meaning that you should not underestimate China's willingness to hurt their economy in order to forward their other political/ideological ambitions.

     

    Yes it is possible China attacks Taiwan. However China are idiots if they attack USA that is the stupidiest thing what they could do and I dont think China is that stupid even if USA hits NK with full force without any warning.

     

    Battlefield 4 you can play that if you want to experience war. Yes China this and that and behaves like bad children. I don't care. Japan is not scared of China anymore, but they respect China military power that is why they are eager to military alliance with Australia and to increase Japans own military power and military budget.

     

    Regards to Taiwan. If China attacks Taiwan it is pretty much internal war between Chinese people and they shoot their own foot in doing so not good for neither main land China or Taiwan.

     

    Hong Kong? Who cares it is already lost their autonomy is gone. Hong Kong as free city really dont exist anymore police already take hard line on any student demonstrations it is that bad. Hong Kong is doomed whatever happens.

  3.  

     

    Sorry are you calling me stupid? That is harassment I take this as half joke.

     

    It was a quote. I do that from time to time. And it was directed towards Valsuelm. Not that it wouldn't apply to you too. Regarding car insurance and stuff: Seems that the only people in this forum who can agree to the OP are spambots (except for Fiach. What does that tell us about him?). Just look at the likes on the OP. You could have figured all of that out by yourself, but hey: It's Saturday and I have the time.

     

     

     

    ANTIFA exist in small scale in my country. I have never personally met them but heard about the mindless vandalism they have for example maid mayhem during night time gone doing some night time something on public place. They make their best to avoid also police and are not very visible in my country usually.

     

    This anarcism goes over the line even my left party friends think ANTIFA are really stupid people.

     

    ANTIFA is much more visible in USA there they crash and fight often with Trump supporters but of course not always fighting also due to big police patrols in the area. This USA president choice  I leave that to the Americans they choose who leads the country that simple is it.

    Have you ever actually read 1984? You really should.

     

    No I have not read 1984, but if they have that I can read without buy it I might read it.

     

    Ok so you are said that Valsuelm is stupid. Lol Valsuelm has ok youtube that I can see. Valuselm is not stupid and I think Valsuelm is ok.

     

    Uk is s*it lol. I know they have even said to me that come and work in UK. I said NO! I have also a frend that worked in UK but dont want to live there anymore.

     

    Actually I am wrong. Perhaps I go as tourist to UK so I can fight and hurt **** ANTIFA and I am deadly serious about that. I still never have met ANTIFA in real life.

     

    It is freaking cold currently in my country but I have not seen anything of ANTIFA in real life and it would not be boring if I meet them!

     

    Now I have a friend that want me to travel with him but not to UK. It would cost me money to travel to UK so at end of the day perhaps not travelling there. I rather go to warm south Europe. Much like USA people in northern states like to travel top beaches and sun in southern USA states.

  4. Livid (2011)

    + French Horror movie and this is Horror movie.

    + Ok actors.

    + Interesting.

    + Hard to guess how movie ends.

    Neutral. Well a slight spoiler. This movie has supernatural things so if you want 100% realistic movie then please do not see this movie.

    - Well not a super movie.

    - A little bit odd movie.

    - French I needed subtitles for sure.

    My vote: 7/10 good movie.

  5.  

     

    You don't understand. If I see ANTIFA it is likely going to be fight. I have never met ANTIFA in my country because they are cowards that operate at night and rarely do anything anyway in my country.

     

    I am sorry Ben with that statement you have proven we have totally different view. I HATE Antifa and they are my enemy wherever I go.

     

    So there's this enemy. You have never seen them (neither have I), but you are convinced that they are a major threat because you saw some burning cars on TV. And of course you hate them. In capital letters. Have you ever actually read 1984?

     

    ANTIFA exist in small scale in my country. I have never personally met them but heard about the mindless vandalism they have for example maid mayhem during night time gone doing some night time something on public place. They make their best to avoid also police and are not very visible in my country usually.

     

    This anarcism goes over the line even my left party friends think ANTIFA are really stupid people.

     

    ANTIFA is much more visible in USA there they crash and fight often with Trump supporters but of course not always fighting also due to big police patrols in the area. This USA president choice  I leave that to the Americans they choose who leads the country that simple is it.

  6.  

     

    Do you guys think Terminator is a serious poster? I mean he literally described the process of inoculation as if it didn't exist. That was pretty funny.

    I am serious poster. Funny post you have. Inoculation? I have said nothing about vaccine or such things. What is this offtopic ramblings:). Do the sun exist really? Do the Moon exist really? Teasing you I take this as friendly comment and have nothing against you.

     

     

    You don't have to say X, talk about X, or even elude to X, in order for some people to genuinely believe you to have done so, or for others to think you hate X.

     

    Also, note that some folks on this forum find it near impossible to make a serious post themselves.

     

    And finally, the moon doesn't actually exist.

     

     

      This post is about 2/3 serious. :p

     

     

    This post I liked man. You are such a good forum member. Good funny joke addon Moon does not actually exist :yes:.

    • Like 1
  7. Your stupidity makes you a doomed man, but hey: At least you have car insurance rates, easy payday loan and sex cams on your side.

    Sorry are you calling me stupid? That is harassment I take this as half joke. In addition neither do I own a car or have a car insurance. I do have valid driving license and maybe in future I buy a car. My brother and his wife have 3 children and they own 2 cars, but I don't have any children so that is one reason why I have not car at least yet.

     

    Another reason I have investment apartments but also a lot of mortgage (apartment loan) and I find myself more motivated to buy a car when I have less mortgage. I do respect car owners and like Fast and Furious movies.

     

    You don't seem to be a smart person where did you jump to conclusions that I am car owner? In which post have I talked about my car???

  8.  

     

    China does not need to declare war to USA to attack it, because there are lots of contested territories that China want to take under its control but has not done so because agreements with USA and its allies. But if USA attacks on North Korea which China sees at its protectorate, China will at least attempt to take some of those territories, because even though they have been relatively passive world power so far they will not ignore attacks on areas they see to be part of their home territories. 

     

    People often ignore China's domestic politics, but in case of striking North Korea, those politics would play quite big part and force China's leadership to take action even if they don't necessary want to do so.

     

    Also you should not underestimate China's military power on its own home turf and how much economic leverage they have.

    China is worlds 3rd biggest military power after USA the first and Russia second.

     

    Japan do not want to threaten only NK. Japan wants to threaten China so they have said. Japan has done military alliance with Australia... Japan is the country that is most growing in military power currently in the region.

     

    China do not want war with USA to much to loose in that war. In addition if China and USA would start full nuclear war against each other that would be the end of mankind.

     

     

    But would USA declare war to China, if China takes away Taiwan's and Hong Kong's autonomies and taking direct control over lots of world's electronic manufacturing or if China takes over Senkaku Islands and builds their military base there in order to make it easier to strike to Japan there, or if China increases their naval power South China sea and so on?  And what would Australia do if China threatens to block their imports and exports?

     

    Meaning that China and USA don't need to go in full on war in order to have fight over things that effect big economical and political impacts.

     

    Interesting discussing. I dont think China will conquer Japan you greatly underestimate Japan. Japan dont even need USA to defend vs China. Australia would likely make their BETA military alliance with Japan to full military alliance if China will harass them. Australia is not a poor country. I am sure they can increase the military budget if the demand rises and Japan is constantly increasing military budget already.

     

    Hong Kong? Their autonomy is already taken away step by step and there is nothing you can do about that unless you want to start a war with China and nobody wants to attack China based on whatever happens in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is doomed anyway its fate is sealed and it is doomed.

     

    Taiwan? Taiwan is an interesting chapter. History goes that communists stayed in mainland and nationalists moved to Taiwan. Taiwan has been very stubborn in resisting main land China. Regarding Taiwan future I find it very hard to predict for some reason don't know why Taiwan seems to do better then say Hong Kong with China mainland authorities.

     

    Taiwan is so much resisting so I would not sign out the possibility of civil war Taiwan vs mainland. I think they mainly try diplomacy.

     

    If China tries to take Taiwan by force there will be war and Taiwan hates China:

     

    Yes China can go have their wargames with Taiwan that would result in massive military casualties to China mainland and a destroyed Taiwan not a great way to improve China economy and in the aftermath there can be lingering guerilla warfare with terror attacks from pissed of Taiwanese people who have lost the war.

  9.  

     

     

     

    Well so what is USA going to do something about North Korea what do you think? I don't know but for some reason some Finnish forums are full of people who believe USA actually will take military action, but I know it is a tough choice to make and I don't have any specific beliefs regarding that subject but I keep an open mind for possibilities.

     

    Speculation in Finnish forums hit so far that some believed USA would attack after Winter Olympics and now Winter Olympics is over.

     

    In the news currently relationship between UK and Russia hit rock bottom after ex Russian spy was murdered in UK the Uk has now as responce deported many Russian diplomats that were in UK.

     

    I honestly don't know. First there was the sudden (though I guess in hindsight it would have been predictable) offer of one-on-one talks with Kim Jong Un, then silence (no confirmation or anything) from NK, then Trump decided now was a good time to reshuffle his cabinet, which is going to delay the talks.

     

    It's definetly possible that Kim was also worried that Trump might do a pre-emptive strike after the Olympics, but the talks up the stakes and make it more likely for things to go wrong. Now he's putting in Pompeo who is a real hawk on NK and Trump is rumored to be possibly putting in Bolton to replace McMaster as National Security Director, and he's even more of a hawk than Pompeo.

     

    So, really, it depends on Trumps mood and the time of day.

     

    edit: On Hillary, yeah, she really needs to just disappear from the radar, metaphorically, because she isn't helping anything.

     

     

    Kim's offer for talks is strategic move to make it harder for US do pre-emptive strike, because it would look quite badly for US to do strike against NK after they have offered to participate in denuclearization talks, especially China would react quite badly to such strikes in their sphere of influence and they would use them as excuse for either military or economical actions against USA. Also there is quite little to gain, outside of some possible domestic political points,  from strike NK even if they have ICBMs capable to delivering nukes to continental USA and nuclear warheads to arm them with. 

     

    So even though Kim seems like nutty leader, he seems to be much better politician than Trump at least in this issue, considering that Trump gave quite additional power for Kim by not just acknowledging his offer but boasting how big deal said offer is.

     

    Here is what I think you go wrong and you are from Finland like me so I don't consider you an super expert, not saying I am super expert but I was curious about USA people thoughts on the matter.

     

    China would not attack USA if USA attacks North Korea. There is risk of China envolment of course if whole region erupts into chaos

    Japan currently even have a valid more or less military alliance with Australia and that military alliance is pretty much against China.

     

    Japan really hates China and Japan has steadily grown as military power in recent years. If China attacks USA we pretty much have a hornet nest World War 3 on horizon.

     

    Look I have played Battlefield 3 and was thinking of maybe buying cheaply Battlefield 4 that is USA war against China and Russia.

     

    I tell you what if China attacks USA on basis that USA attack Northkorea then Japan and Australia will support USA they hate very much China. China best interest in conflict USA vs NorthKorea is to stay out of the military action.

     

    Best response it is pretty much about Trump what he decides also if he decides war there will be war and I don't believe one minute China will declare war on USA if USA attacks NorthKorea and don't accidentally attack China forces.

     

    If you realistically want to eperience USA vs China war then you can buy Battlefield 4 computer game.

     

     

    China does not need to declare war to USA to attack it, because there are lots of contested territories that China want to take under its control but has not done so because agreements with USA and its allies. But if USA attacks on North Korea which China sees at its protectorate, China will at least attempt to take some of those territories, because even though they have been relatively passive world power so far they will not ignore attacks on areas they see to be part of their home territories. 

     

    People often ignore China's domestic politics, but in case of striking North Korea, those politics would play quite big part and force China's leadership to take action even if they don't necessary want to do so.

     

    Also you should not underestimate China's military power on its own home turf and how much economic leverage they have.

     

    China is worlds 3rd biggest military power after USA the first and Russia second.

     

    Japan do not want to threaten only NK. Japan wants to threaten China so they have said. Japan has done military alliance with Australia... Japan is the country that is most growing in military power currently in the region.

     

    China do not want war with USA to much to loose in that war. In addition if China and USA would start full nuclear war against each other that would be the end of mankind.

  10. US is of course an expert on infiltration and assassination

     

    just look at Bin Laden or teh Yemen operation and what a mess those were

     

    they prolly can barely even kill a bug without a nuke

    What the ****? Have you been listening to some false Chinese propaganda? Bin Laden was killed succesfully in year 2011 by Americans the mission was a success. There was some civilian casualties, but that is usually unavoidable when dealing with cowards.

     

    Now NK leader is much harder to assassinate (at least if he stays within NK) I can admit that. Military war would perhaps be better way to stop NK.

  11.  

     

    If shots are fired Kim will fight like the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark, He has to figure once shooting starts nothing short of regime change will suffice. And he's right. If would be a waste of blood and treasure to fight any conflict that leaves him in power. So unless we're going to go all the way, don't go at all. Better to take the latter option, He can stay in power until he dies for all I care. As long as he stays on his side of the DMZ everything is fine. Now the trick is making HIM understand that.

     

    Yeah, f*ck those gulaged millions of people as long as they are not dying on my yard

     

    Then give me a solution that does not end with tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of South Koreans killed in artillery barrages that will likely level Seoul in the 10-12 hours it will take for US air power to silence them. Or, God forbid they actually get a nuclear weapon into play. We are quite safe here despite his boasts but SK & Japan are not.

     

    Japan actually have some kind of nuclear defense but yes no nuclear defence is safe or certain defense. Japan would strike NK back and hard and have grown in military power during recent years and Australia has a first military alliance with Japan.

     

    Southkorea uhm... they have some forces but are pretty much ****ed if it becomes war that is true unfortunately.

  12. If shots are fired Kim will fight like the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark, He has to figure once shooting starts nothing short of regime change will suffice. And he's right. If would be a waste of blood and treasure to fight any conflict that leaves him in power. So unless we're going to go all the way, don't go at all. Better to take the latter option, He can stay in power until he dies for all I care. As long as he stays on his side of the DMZ everything is fine. Now the trick is making HIM understand that.

    Yes but Northkorea nuclear threat grows every year. North Korea has also shown that if their leader dies then they get a new tyrant on the throne. Even if Kim dies of say old age there will be a successor another tyrant.

     

    Yes in fact North Korea rich class the upper class millionaires they really exist they can enjoy luxury even in North Korea. However North Korea realistically will remain a dictatorship even if Kim dies of old age.

  13.  

     

    Well so what is USA going to do something about North Korea what do you think? I don't know but for some reason some Finnish forums are full of people who believe USA actually will take military action, but I know it is a tough choice to make and I don't have any specific beliefs regarding that subject but I keep an open mind for possibilities.

     

    Speculation in Finnish forums hit so far that some believed USA would attack after Winter Olympics and now Winter Olympics is over.

     

    In the news currently relationship between UK and Russia hit rock bottom after ex Russian spy was murdered in UK the Uk has now as responce deported many Russian diplomats that were in UK.

     

    I honestly don't know. First there was the sudden (though I guess in hindsight it would have been predictable) offer of one-on-one talks with Kim Jong Un, then silence (no confirmation or anything) from NK, then Trump decided now was a good time to reshuffle his cabinet, which is going to delay the talks.

     

    It's definetly possible that Kim was also worried that Trump might do a pre-emptive strike after the Olympics, but the talks up the stakes and make it more likely for things to go wrong. Now he's putting in Pompeo who is a real hawk on NK and Trump is rumored to be possibly putting in Bolton to replace McMaster as National Security Director, and he's even more of a hawk than Pompeo.

     

    So, really, it depends on Trumps mood and the time of day.

     

    edit: On Hillary, yeah, she really needs to just disappear from the radar, metaphorically, because she isn't helping anything.

     

     

    Kim's offer for talks is strategic move to make it harder for US do pre-emptive strike, because it would look quite badly for US to do strike against NK after they have offered to participate in denuclearization talks, especially China would react quite badly to such strikes in their sphere of influence and they would use them as excuse for either military or economical actions against USA. Also there is quite little to gain, outside of some possible domestic political points,  from strike NK even if they have ICBMs capable to delivering nukes to continental USA and nuclear warheads to arm them with. 

     

    So even though Kim seems like nutty leader, he seems to be much better politician than Trump at least in this issue, considering that Trump gave quite additional power for Kim by not just acknowledging his offer but boasting how big deal said offer is. 

     

    Here is what I think you go wrong and you are from Finland like me so I don't consider you an super expert, not saying I am super expert but I was curious about USA people thoughts on the matter.

     

    China would not attack USA if USA attacks North Korea. There is risk of China envolment of course if whole region erupts into chaos

    Japan currently even have a valid more or less military alliance with Australia and that military alliance is pretty much against China.

     

    Japan really hates China and Japan has steadily grown as military power in recent years. If China attacks USA we pretty much have a hornet nest World War 3 on horizon.

     

    Look I have played Battlefield 3 and was thinking of maybe buying cheaply Battlefield 4 that is USA war against China and Russia.

     

    I tell you what if China attacks USA on basis that USA attack Northkorea then Japan and Australia will support USA they hate very much China. China best interest in conflict USA vs NorthKorea is to stay out of the military action.

     

    Best response it is pretty much about Trump what he decides also if he decides war there will be war and I don't believe one minute China will declare war on USA if USA attacks NorthKorea and don't accidentally attack China forces.

     

    If you realistically want to eperience USA vs China war then you can buy Battlefield 4 computer game.

  14. Well so what is USA going to do something about North Korea what do you think? I don't know but for some reason some Finnish forums are full of people who believe USA actually will take military action, but I know it is a tough choice to make and I don't have any specific beliefs regarding that subject but I keep an open mind for possibilities.

     

    Speculation in Finnish forums hit so far that some believed USA would attack after Winter Olympics and now Winter Olympics is over.

     

    In the news currently relationship between UK and Russia hit rock bottom after ex Russian spy was murdered in UK the Uk has now as responce deported many Russian diplomats that were in UK.

  15.  

    How can we see if our eyes aren't real?

    We see what we see and it's different from everyone else. The reality you see around you is different than the reality of someone sitting beside you. It's amazing we can even get along at times lol.

     

    Yes lets simply get along and stop this mild funny harrasment that someone is not real lol.

     

    We might have different political views, but that is life. There are also like different religion beliefs Christians, Muslims, Jews and Atheist the list goes on in what people believe. I think most of us look forward to Pillars of Eternity 2 or some other Obisidian game and we share that we like Obsidian in general. Current release date for Pillars of Eternity 2 is set as 8th May 2018.

  16. Do you guys think Terminator is a serious poster? I mean he literally described the process of inoculation as if it didn't exist. That was pretty funny.

    I am serious poster. Funny post you have. Inoculation? I have said nothing about vaccine or such things. What is this offtopic ramblings:). Do the sun exist really? Do the Moon exist really? Teasing you I take this as friendly comment and have nothing against you.

  17. I’m still unclear on Schulz’ presumed position towards Kokoomus

    No I dont think Kokoomus hates Schulz or that Schulz hates Kokoomus first thing they dont meet or have things to do with each other. Personally I like more Schulz then say Merkel. If Schulz would be in future elected as Gemany leader then Finand would respect that. I don't think Kokoomus in Finland and Schulz party in Germany has to do with each other.

     

    I meant more that I find it hard to believe that Schulz party would adapt the capitalistic views of Kokoomus in Finland. No disrespect meant to Schulz in fact I think Schulz could be a good replacement of Merkel.

     

    Kokoomus many capitalistic suggestions are often voted down in Finland from other parties. Regarding NATO I can't predict that it is very hard for me how that will go.

  18.  

     

     

     

    I would rather not pollute my head with filth.....

    Too late, the pollution is thick!!!

     

    and unfortunately oozing out!!!

    Sure, but you don't clean the river by throwing more toxins into the

    There are political thinkers that tackle issues from the centrist/conservative position, who may or may not be liberal on certain matters. Then there are reactionary people who drum up hysteria and play to the same mentalities that antifa, sjws, and other radical leftists do.

     

    Alex Jones has zero journalistic integrity and should be disregarded whole-sale. He's a conspiracy theorist who got his start by leveraging conspiracies that turned out true, and has become a hound dog with a nose trained to follow anything that might pair well with his deep-state narratives. I thought he was probably half parody for the longest time, but I think he used to maintain plausible deniability. He's completely lost it. Anything worth while that he speaks of he's likely to taint, not worth trying to sift the wheat from the chaff there.

     

    Black Pigeon is a trash-tier alt-right mouthpiece porked up with plenty of unsavory sexist, racist, and bigoted opinions. Terrible source if you're interested in opinions that counter the current movements on the left.

     

    Tommy Robinson is a nationalist, and that means he flies close with ethno-nationalists. He certainly doesn't work all that hard to keep his network clean. Probably the least worst out of the lot, but not exactly someone who I'd follow for his intellectually take on things. He probably speaks on some lived truths that a lot of white working class people in the UK experience, but I'd be very hesitant to follow him whole-sale. He too relies far to much on appeals to emotion, and suffers from tunnel vision when discussing issues.

    Jada jada I dont respect your political views so how about that.

     

    Guess twice my party? True Finns that is the nationalistic party of Finland though even nearly so hardcore as AFP is in Germany. True FInns was in last elections second biggest party in Finland and they are in the Goverment. Their party for different views got split up and realistically they are not in next goverment ruling section.

     

    Finland goverment is ruled by 3 big parties currently: The Center biggest party, True Finns, Kokoomus (whatever it is in English but they are very capitalistic party for being Finns though less capitalistic then USA).

     

    In next elections I think Kokoomus is going to be biggest party they seem to have most support currently. The Prime Minister is selected from biggest party and he is the man who has most power in Finland.

    There's a party calling themselves 'true finns'? What are they campaigning for, lebensraum? :lol:

     

    One more thing on sosialism and capitalism spectrum giving immigrant vs antiimmigrant a rest.

     

    Germany landlords do not get any tax reduction from their investment loans.

    Swedens tenants can sue Sweden landlords for to high rent.

     

    Finland landlords laugh at those socialistic things in Sweden and Germany regarding rules concerning tenant vs landlord. I am member of Finnish landlord organisation. Kokoomus is very capitalistic and Martin Schulz in Germany leader of socialistic party would dislike very much Kokoomus. It is Kokoomus that matters in next elections in Finland I think so. They want increase military budget more captilastic society and that Finland joins NATO.

  19.  

     

     

     

    I would rather not pollute my head with filth.....

    Too late, the pollution is thick!!!

     

    and unfortunately oozing out!!!

    Sure, but you don't clean the river by throwing more toxins into the

    There are political thinkers that tackle issues from the centrist/conservative position, who may or may not be liberal on certain matters. Then there are reactionary people who drum up hysteria and play to the same mentalities that antifa, sjws, and other radical leftists do.

     

    Alex Jones has zero journalistic integrity and should be disregarded whole-sale. He's a conspiracy theorist who got his start by leveraging conspiracies that turned out true, and has become a hound dog with a nose trained to follow anything that might pair well with his deep-state narratives. I thought he was probably half parody for the longest time, but I think he used to maintain plausible deniability. He's completely lost it. Anything worth while that he speaks of he's likely to taint, not worth trying to sift the wheat from the chaff there.

     

    Black Pigeon is a trash-tier alt-right mouthpiece porked up with plenty of unsavory sexist, racist, and bigoted opinions. Terrible source if you're interested in opinions that counter the current movements on the left.

     

    Tommy Robinson is a nationalist, and that means he flies close with ethno-nationalists. He certainly doesn't work all that hard to keep his network clean. Probably the least worst out of the lot, but not exactly someone who I'd follow for his intellectually take on things. He probably speaks on some lived truths that a lot of white working class people in the UK experience, but I'd be very hesitant to follow him whole-sale. He too relies far to much on appeals to emotion, and suffers from tunnel vision when discussing issues.

    Jada jada I dont respect your political views so how about that.

     

    Guess twice my party? True Finns that is the nationalistic party of Finland though even nearly so hardcore as AFP is in Germany. True FInns was in last elections second biggest party in Finland and they are in the Goverment. Their party for different views got split up and realistically they are not in next goverment ruling section.

     

    Finland goverment is ruled by 3 big parties currently: The Center biggest party, True Finns, Kokoomus (whatever it is in English but they are very capitalistic party for being Finns though less capitalistic then USA).

     

    In next elections I think Kokoomus is going to be biggest party they seem to have most support currently. The Prime Minister is selected from biggest party and he is the man who has most power in Finland.

    There's a party calling themselves 'true finns'? What are they campaigning for, lebensraum? :lol:

     

    If you ask me what they are campaigning right now dont know since I become more interested when it is election year.

     

    In previous elections they campaigned for:

    Less immigrants intake. However nothing so radical as fence building like for example Hungary have done. Less money to other countries since we have our own economy to worry about.

    Increase police force. Lots of police were in recent years laid off from goverment side and they wanted to reinstate more police.

    In the capitalism vs left party they are somewhat in the middle.

    Pro Nuclear plant policy as energy source.

    On take on NATO joining they are somewhat neutral and divided opinions in the party, but many are against NATO.

     

    I am not so much interested in that party because they got divided in half and will likely not be in the goverment next time.

     

     

    The interesting party that really interest me if they will likely be biggest party in next elections is Kokoomus that is economically very capitalistic party though they try to mask themselves a liberals which they are somewhat also but very capitlistic on the employer/entreprenur side against the employee. What makes it very interesting that this time they strongly advocate NATO joining, but whole Finland is quite divided on that subject. President is from Kokoomus party and he recently got elected for next 6 years again with crushing majority of votes.

     

    Personally I am pro NATO joining but I know my country is very divided around that subject. No I will not predict if we join NATO or not but Kokoomus is PRO NATO joining.

     

    Schulz in Germany leader of sosialistic party would not like Kokoomus they are economically the most capitalistic party in Finland. Still less capitalistic then USA, but a step in that direction. Kokoomus wants increase also in own military budget but that notion is shared with every big political party in Finland those that matter and that have power. In a nutschell I believe Kokoomus will be biggest party in Finland after next elections and Prime Minister is selected from biggest party.

  20. I reiterate, this forum is especially hopeless today. I sympathize though, the Deadfire delay also hit me pretty hard. :(

    Yeah hopeless you can tell that in the mirror lol. Deadfire delayed to May? Ok so be it then. I think they want to develop a really good game and sometimes that takes time.

  21. Are you just ****ting out media content that validates you're views, or are you going to put a little more effort in of your own?

     

    There are issues with banking, and you'll never come to truly understand what the problems are if you follow **** like that. It's a much longer, slower, and tedious road to get a handle on it all. A lot of the issues aren't even conspiracy level but relate ignorance and unmanageable complexity.

    Unlike Algoth who only put some denial video I put out videos that I believe in.

     

    You have already proven to me you don't share same views as me that is crystal clear. No why would I put huge effort in writing hundreds of words? I don't see it worth doing. I rather find what I believe in.

     

    There are lot of creative youtube creators out there. I never said that I am creative but it is easy to post a link. What so I should put some huge effort to make you happy when end result is that you don't believe in same things as I do unless you might really watch something and perhaps learn:). No not writing essays. I am not paranoid if I would be really scared I would have no investment debt but I do have investement debt. Even if a banking cartell exist I don't think they are all powerful and globalists have had some setbacks.

  22.  

    What is your take on that new guy Peterson I sometimes see on YT

     

    Also I think everyone know that Jones is joke no?

     

    My grandpa thought Alex Jones might have something worth while to say just because Megan Kelly setup an entirely unfair interview format against him, so it's not like people don't get dupped into his shtick.

     

    I actually really like Jordan B Peterson. I started following his academic stuff even before the whole Bill C-16 which smuggled in compelled speech laws. I'm actually a fan of Sam Harris as well, and I know those two and their respective communities don't seem to get along all that well.

     

    I think he's buckling a bit under the immense media pressure, doesn't always express himself the best than he can, and a huge swath of the left can't help but misinterpret him. I think he's trying to formulate his insights in a way that lay people can digest it, and it's far from as good as his academic lectures. If you dig back and look at a lot of his material you start to see a really profound picture unfolding. It actually takes some effort though to understand it all, and it's very routed in academic neuropsychology.

     

    I do agree with Harris that a lot of what Peterson talks about could be reformatted in a secularly humanistic manner, but I do think Peterson is very right about a lot of what he speaks about. I don't think Harris appreciates the fact that certain morals are hard to formalize unless experienced in a highly figurative sense. Peterson is far more the pragmatist.

     

    I'd be happy to go on but maybe in another thread.

     

    I believe in this what they tell about banking and so does the vast majority of my friends do most of them:

     

    Nevermind the other conspiracy theories 9/11 etc. Bear with me. I said I believe everything they said about banking cartels and that video is from Alex Jones channel. Of all possible conspiray theories out there I really believe in the conspiracy theory of banking cartell see it.

  23.  

    There are political thinkers that tackle issues from the centrist/conservative position, who may or may not be liberal on certain matters. Then there are reactionary people who drum up hysteria and play to the same mentalities that antifa, sjws, and other radical leftists do.

     

    Alex Jones has zero journalistic integrity and should be disregarded whole-sale. He's a conspiracy theorist who got his start by leveraging conspiracies that turned out true, and has become a hound dog with a nose trained to follow anything that might pair well with his deep-state narratives. I thought he was probably half parody for the longest time, but I think he used to maintain plausible deniability. He's completely lost it. Anything worth while that he speaks of he's likely to taint, not worth trying to sift the wheat from the chaff there.

     

    Black Pigeon is a trash-tier alt-right mouthpiece porked up with plenty of unsavory sexist, racist, and bigoted opinions. Terrible source if you're interested in opinions that counter the current movements on the left.

     

    Tommy Robinson is a nationalist, and that means he flies close with ethno-nationalists. He certainly doesn't work all that hard to keep his network clean. Probably the least worst out of the lot, but not exactly someone who I'd follow for his intellectually take on things. He probably speaks on some lived truths that a lot of white working class people in the UK experience, but I'd be very hesitant to follow him whole-sale. He too relies far to much on appeals to emotion, and suffers from tunnel vision when discussing issues.

     

    What is your take on that new guy Peterson I sometimes see on YT

     

    Also I think everyone know that Jones is joke no?

     

    Jones is respected by me and some other Finns. He is not perfect. If I would critize they do advertising for nutrient this and that pills on his channel.

     

    On the conspiracy theories I do believe some of them. There is no smoke without fire. There is that huge globalist conspiracy theory but from that I do believe everything that considered banks etc.

     

    Problem with Alex Jones is perhaps he present every possible conspiracy therory out there but lets say I believe in some of them and keep an open mind.

×
×
  • Create New...