Chris_R
-
Posts
71 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Chris_R
-
-
Ranzak.... What use is that spell slot when you always banish your spell? Actually, you don't.
You mean you'd consider giving Ranzak anything other than Cure?
-
I happen to rather like Tontelizi, and think he'd be more effective than in the card game because of all the polearms available in treasure.
I expect it to be Flenta though as she's just a bundle of fun.
It should be Reta Bigbad from Goblins Fight as she's technically a sort of fighter and because goblins.
Also, we need Chuffy and Mogmurch. We need them.
Ok, I need them.
-
2
-
-
I happen to rather like Tontelizi, and think he'd be more effective than in the card game because of all the polearms available in treasure.
I expect it to be Flenta though as she's just a bundle of fun.
It should be Reta Bigbad from Goblins Fight as she's technically a sort of fighter and because goblins.
-
2
-
-
Interesting - it has now shown up (at least on Android). Must have just been impatience at my end!
-
So unfortunately, there is a bug within the collections tab where Eder and Pallegina are invisible. A copy of these cards should be visible in your Unclaimed tab so that you may add them to your decks, but please rest assured that they are there in your collection!
Thanks for the prompt reply!
Does that also apply to the Goblin Golem?
-
Just upgraded through the Ambassador Programme and whilst I seem to have everything else, I don't seem to have the promos. Not sure if the Pillars promos are ready yet (be nice to see Eder again mind), but I know the Golem exists (even if I don't have it). Am I doing something wrong?
-
I can understand why this has been done, but can't say I'm happy with it. I have been carefully curating my treasure cards so they don't show up all the time and now I have a stack of them - I'd like the option of being able to say 'actually, I'd like less of these cards than the maximum allowed.
I mean, I like me an Orb of Ice, but not when it's the only Item I ever flippin' draw.
-
*bites lip*
I seem to have acquired some treasure rewards I haven't earned. I have an unreasonable number of Red Dice sets (no biggie, but not completely sure what I am supposed to do with 24 sets), I've got a whole bunch of the Edge dice (about 12 extra sets apiece) and most egregiously of all I have a set of Nathan's Tribute dice that I must have earned just for being awesome (which I am, to be fair), rather than for getting any Quest Mode characters to level 25, which I didn't do on account of just generally being rubbish at Quest Mode (but still totally deserving the dice).
Also I seem to have a lot more treasure cards, which is noticeabke as I make sure to only have 1 copy of each Treasure Card (except for blessings, a couple of spells and the level 6 ring of protection as that's essential) so that I actually see cards from the physical game from time to time, but I don't know how that's supposed to work. I think I only have one copy of cards I got through the free PC DLC and didn't have already, but I seem to have a bunch of the more common treasure cards that I already have.
I post this not to brag (that would be crass), nor to actually ask the devs to take stuff from me (that would be daft - although fair), but to demonstrate that there's something amiss with some of the way rewards are distributed and that it's not as simple as people not getting stuff they should have (unfortunately).
slight update
Just went to check what I had by logging back in and I now have 30 sets of Red Dice. Are they actually Tribbles? I think we should be told.
-
I thought this had initially happened to me but then found that a new PFID had been created that had all my PC content on (and some of my tablet content).
I merged the two IDS and everything appeared on both devices. It could well be that this is the issue on some of these cases.
-
I'm not mad. Frankly I don't see why anyone should expect to get a free game on a completely different platform simply because they have it on another.
You have the game already, and a lot of the free stuff in the Ambassador Programme are things you would normally have to pay for. Getting parts of the Goblin campaign to boot? Pretty decent deal.
Now, if you have been a vigorous member of the community and actively helped the devs to improve the game, I think there is a case that folks in that position might be entitled to hope for a little reward if they think in a very transactional way. But if all you have done is rocked up, bought the game, and played it, then I am not sure why anyone should feel angry about not getting freebies.
-
3
-
-
Also Epic and Legendary cards DLC seems to be free atm. WAI?
That doesn't look right at all.
-
I just picked up the base edition on steam myself. Whether or not the coupons stack, waiting for an extra 10% off amounts to less than $2. I'll get more than $2 of play out of the game this weekend while we wait on the ambassador portal to go live.
GO GO GO!
Same here. I'll just kick it old-school without all the extra cards, as nature (well, Lone Shark) intended - not exactly a hardship!
-
2
-
-
To get the dice rolling, here's my best today at 157:
Whiskey? This I would call a overkill
Can't say he doesn't deserve it!
-
1
-
-
So, i finally bought The Hook Mountain Massacre. And as usual, i had gone to vault, to see new cards. And guess what i had seen? I had seen Scrying spell, which has EXACTLY the same effect as Augury spell, BUT much (MUCH!) worse checks for both acquiring and recharging it: Augury have checks Int/Wis/Arc/Div 6 to acquire and Arc/Div 8 checks for recharge, while Scrying have Int/Arc 10 or Wis/Div 12 to acquire and Arc/Div 12 to recharge. WTF?! Normally, in later decks spells are BETTER in their functionality (while, yes, they are harder to check), but here this spell have SAME functionality with worse checks.
IMHO it should be counted as bug, and Scrying should be modified to have either more cards checked, or to have additional modifier for checks (for cards, which are set aside)
Take note that Augury allow you to look only at your current location while Scrying allow you to look at ANY location... which is a huge difference. One that justify higher checks...
They are both amongst the very best spells in the game, but Scrying is significantly better.
-
1
-
-
I personally love the idea of Quest Mode and we are looking into a way where it supports the Story Mode game characters instead but leaving both types of characters in the game... bad juju.
Considering you'll remove the Quest characters, any chance we get a boost to the Story mode Party/character limits? The numbers now are really insufficient (yes, I do NOT want to delete my characters who have already completed the campaign :D
Very much this. Especially if there are goblins in the offing. I am going to have to complete the campaign with all goblins , after all.
And I do mean 'I have to'. My psyche leaves me no choice in the matter. Every day that there are goblins and I haven't goblined all I can goblin with them will gnaw at my mind.
-
1
-
-
I have one and I just checked and it has the Magic trait.
Interesting - I wonder if, when I find it in-game, it'll show the same? I'll have to play more to find out!
-
Still an issue as of today's patch 1.1.6.4.1
Are you sure?
As of 1.1.6.4.1, it looks like the Slaying Sword lost the Elite trait and gained the Magic Trait.
My copy in the Gallery still has the Elite trait and not the Magic trait. I haven't found it in-game.
-
The weapon Slaying Sword lacks the Magic trait and can't defeat monsters that can only be defeated by magic weapons. More details here.
Still an issue as of today's patch 1.1.6.4.1
-
No fix to the Slaying Sword yet? Really?
Bit late to this party but doesn't look to me like it's been fixed.
-
Thanks for the realistic answer Flounder. I think it's obvious that the app presents technical challenges.
FWIW any new boxes are an instant buy from me (well as long as they're priced like Runelords). Going to view the PC version a bit as a disguised Kickstarter and grab a copy
-
All have d8 or better in WIS. Hard to see a party weakness. Trying in quest mode first.
Kyra 1 (don't have alt yet)
Ezren 2
Seelah 1 (don't have alt yet)
Lini 2
Sajan 1 (will never bother with alt)
Thoughts?
Like the look of it - and it will be strong later in the game where there are tough locations with Wis requirements. I think you'll have a lot of fun with that group.
-
My favorite so far was the "girl band", i.e. all of the 6 female characters together: Seelah, Seoni, Lini, Amiri, Kyra and Merisiel. They're a pretty strong party and fairly well balanced.
Tried that one myself and they work very well. 3 healers and three who burn cards makes an effective team.
On the physical game, I have an all-gnome team of Lini, Tontelizi, Balazar, Raz, Cogsnap, Qualzar and Melindra. That's a very entertaining group to play.
Plus, of course the Six Goblin Party.
-
Thank you both for the advice.
I think I will go:
1) Ezren, Kyra, Amiri, Sajan
2) Seoni, Lini, Valeros, Merisel
3) Lem, Seelah, Harsk
Changes were made for the following reasons:
* There is one heavy armor and one light armor person in each group.
* Sajan is with Ezren to balance out his lack of blessings
* I like Seelah's and Harsk's synergy in card peeking.
Problems are:
* No Diplomats in group 1.
* 2 ranged weapon users in group 3.
Any thoughts?
Good reasoning, but I agree with you you will find the lack of a good Dip/Char dice/other closing option troublesome in Party 1 as there are so many places where Charisma is useful (helps a lot with Allies as well, and there are times when snaring a stray Ally and immediately using the explore might mean the difference between scenario success or failure).
I think you want Seelah in Group 1, Amiri in Group 2 and Val in Group 3 to ensure you have a Charisma option in each - and for the fun of a Lem, Val, Harsk assistance-fest.
The downside of that is Group 2 will need Lini to carry a lot of healing as Seoni, Amiri and Merisiel all have a tendency to burn through cards. You shouldn't have a lot of trouble ending villains with that party though!
-
If you pair Lem with Valeros then they can be boosting each other with d4s while Harsk also helps them out with another d4. This party is probably the weakest of the three, but looks the most fun to play!
I like it a lot. This does sound a blast to play.
The Next Backstory Adventure
in Pathfinder Adventures: General Discussion (No Spoilers!)
Posted
Yes, please, and Melindra, pretty please.