Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Equality?


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1
Aoyagi

Aoyagi

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 238 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

I've just finished Tyranny and I have to admit that this "equality" trend of yours is getting a bit distracting. AP and DS3 were great in this. They had a diverse, but believable character cast. PE started to be a bit on the "diversity for the sake of diversity" edge, but Tyranny just felt like an advertisement for equality. Did you set some internal quotas or something? What that achieved for me wast that, for example, a concept I would normally accept without any second thoughts whatsoever (I mean the apparently matriarchal Beasts) just comes off as another activist addition. 

 

But it really comes down to the composition of armies on Terratus. I really wonder what is the male/female ratio of the conscripts and of the (sub)group leaders. I'm not going to say it's unrealistic, because this is a fantasy world, but it's inauthentic, not very believable, it ruins the verisimilitude. It also leaves the bitter taste of activism. I presume that was also the point of Kyros' "gender mystery"... 

 

I know, artistic vision and all that, but these things could be a little more balanced (as ironic as that sounds). This way it can pointlessly detract the experience for people who actually pay attention to the world and the characters. It's nowhere near to stop me from enjoying the game, but know that having players think "ugh, here we go again" throughout the game for something so pointless is does not add to the experience a lot.


  • Androoh, Labadal, Revan91 and 1 other like this

#2
Labadal

Labadal

    Janitor of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 3824 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I agree.



#3
Wormerine

Wormerine

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 755 posts
  • Location:Poznan
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
Tyranny and Pillars of Eternity have not pushed any equality agendas. I wasn't offended when Gothic1 had almost entirely male cast. I am not offended now when PoE and Tyranny has a mixed sex society. I don't remember those game ever drawing attention to it.

I think that lack of definition on Kyros part comes from a much different direction than you think it does. Similar with Beastman. There might be "let's look on a spreadsheet and make sure we have similar amount of female and male NPCs" but I imagine that is about it.

#4
TrueNeutral

TrueNeutral

    Forum Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 2404 posts
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Steam:funderbunk

And it's the activists who are the one's bending over backwards looking for outrage. Riiight.


  • Amentep, Hurlshot, Deadly_Nightshade and 7 others like this

#5
Aoyagi

Aoyagi

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 238 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

Tyranny and Pillars of Eternity have not pushed any equality agendas. I wasn't offended when Gothic1 had almost entirely male cast. I am not offended now when PoE and Tyranny has a mixed sex society. I don't remember those game ever drawing attention to it.

 

Well, that was quick. Firstly, nowhere did I say or even imply that I was offended by this whole thing. Secondly, highlighted "composition of armies" in bold specifically for people like you, who would accuse me of complaining about mixed society.

 

And lastly, yes, I was slightly bothered (not offended, not triggered, or anything like that) by almost entirely male population in Gothic 1, because just like in Tyranny, it clashed with authenticity. Although if I remember correctly, that was a technical mater.

 

 

I think that lack of definition on Kyros part comes from a much different direction than you think it does. Similar with Beastman. There might be "let's look on a spreadsheet and make sure we have similar amount of female and male NPCs" but I imagine that is about it.

 

I suspect the Kyros thing is something else as well, but it's just one thing with another, it adds up. Again, if it wasn't for the unbelievable number of women-soldiers as the initiator of my suspicions, I probably wouldn't think much of it (from this respect anyway).

 

 

And it's the activists who are the one's bending over backwards looking for outrage. Riiight.

 
What? Look, mate, if you have a point, be so kind and make it.

Edited by Aoyagi, 05 August 2017 - 03:30 AM.


#6
smjjames

smjjames

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 894 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

As for the matriarchial Beastmen, there are examples in nature, Hyenas for one. So, I wouldn't say that the Beastmen/women being a matriarchial society is a poke at equality or anything.

 

Besides, neither PE or Tyranny made any big deal about the equality thing. There are some bits about culture as far as male/female roles go in Tyranny and in PE, it only comes up in the context of Palleginas paladin order and the unique situation of godlikes.


Edited by smjjames, 05 August 2017 - 05:46 AM.

  • rjshae and Hawke64 like this

#7
injurai

injurai

    (9) Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1265 posts
  • Location:Not the oceans
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

I thought Pillars was fine (other than maybe the backer npcs being highly exotic god likes.)

 

When it comes to activism, what I do truly hate is a 1-to-1 shoehorning of real world issues into the fictional world and then crafting a singular voice that is incredibly on the nose and present in all of the "good" characters. Now that is truly loathsome and nauseating. But I never felt this way once with Pillars. The worst thing was maybe Sagani's self-introduction, and that was due to it being a lore dump, not that she was a subversion trope.


  • algroth and Wormerine like this

#8
Hurlshot

Hurlshot

    Obsidian Order Hockey Puck

  • Members
  • 8632 posts
  • Location:Gilroy, CA
  • Xbox Gamertag:Hurlshot
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
It sounds like you have personal hang ups about diversity and equality and you are transposing them onto a fantasy universe. My recommendation is to create your own fantasy universe that fits your own world view more accurately.
  • Deadly_Nightshade, Fluffle, Faerunner and 1 other like this

#9
algroth

algroth

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 619 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Tyranny never once made me think of "diversity for the sake of diversity", really. It's been a long-standing custom across many (most?) RPG worlds that men and women are equally capable fighters and equally able to join the army or faction of their choice. Amidst the games and worlds I've come across that attempted to justify a matriarchy, in all honesty I think Tyranny is one of the best and most natural at that too. Personally I don't see a problem here, or 'activism' at play for that matter.


  • Jozape and eimatshya like this

#10
kirottu

kirottu

    Luchador Ninja

  • Members
  • 4528 posts
  • Location:Finland
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Tyranny never once made me think of "diversity for the sake of diversity", really. It's been a long-standing custom across many (most?) RPG worlds that men and women are equally capable fighters and equally able to join the army or faction of their choice. 

 

This has been the case since goldbox RPGs. Aoyagi doesn't know the history CRPGs and injects modern politics where they are not needed.


  • Hurlshot, Fluffle, algroth and 2 others like this

#11
HooAmEye

HooAmEye

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 184 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Heck, it goes back to 1974 with the first edition of D&D. The scene had always been progressive


Edited by HooAmEye, 05 August 2017 - 12:15 PM.


#12
Labadal

Labadal

    Janitor of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 3824 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I think people are harsh on Aoyagi. I reacted to the same thing as them. I don't care about the beastmen, but the amount of women in the army seemed weird to me. It doesn't offend me in the slightest, but it seemed a bit silly. Doesn't mean anything, really.


  • Revan91 likes this

#13
HoonDing

HoonDing

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 8913 posts
  • Location:Absurdistan

"I really wonder what is the male/female ratio of the conscripts and of the (sub)group leaders."

 

4:1



#14
Bartimaeus

Bartimaeus

    (10) Necromancer

  • Members
  • 1547 posts
  • Steam:Ask!

Tyranny never once made me think of "diversity for the sake of diversity", really. It's been a long-standing custom across many (most?) RPG worlds that men and women are equally capable fighters and equally able to join the army or faction of their choice.

 
This has been the case since goldbox RPGs. Aoyagi doesn't know the history CRPGs and injects modern politics where they are not needed.


I grew up with D&D and CRPGs, and so while I can understand Aoyagi's point (because you generally assume that humans and other human-like races will presumably match the physical tendencies/limitations of humans in real life for the most part), it is also kind of just a given for me that both men and women are relative equals - at least the warrior/adventurer-types - in these sorts of games. It's interesting to envision how trying to get closer to the tendencies of reality would play out in terms of stats: women might get a decent penalty to STR (maybe something like -3 or -4 in D&D?) and a smaller one to CON (maybe -1 or -2?), but would get...hmm, women are supposed to mature faster than men, so maybe give them an extra starting feat (or the equivalent) or something like that?

Or you can just continue to do the easier and more generally inoffensive thing and make it not change stats at all, like they do now. ...OR you could provide some kind of option like that that either sex could take: take some sort of stat penalty in order to get an extra feat or special ability, thereby providing a sort of option to emulate it (IF you want) while giving more character customization. That seems like the best choice to me (although perhaps it's a little too much for initial character creation), but what do I know? It's good to keep in mind that these are supposed to be FANTASY games (...and I don't mean in terms of genre): whether you're a man or a woman, whether you want to play *as* a man or a woman, it's supposed to be your character as you envision it. Is it really that big of a deal to provide the option for unrealistic character builds when everything about this is ridiculous and unrealistic to begin with?

Edited by Bartimaeus, 05 August 2017 - 09:47 PM.

  • Hurlshot, injurai and Wormerine like this

#15
injurai

injurai

    (9) Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1265 posts
  • Location:Not the oceans
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Yeah, equality between the sexes isn't something new to the medium or the result of recent politics. It's been part of rpgs since the beginning. And as far as I know, race is always redefined as speciation, instead of crude phenotypical classification.


  • HooAmEye likes this

#16
Hurlshot

Hurlshot

    Obsidian Order Hockey Puck

  • Members
  • 8632 posts
  • Location:Gilroy, CA
  • Xbox Gamertag:Hurlshot
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

I think people are harsh on Aoyagi. I reacted to the same thing as them. I don't care about the beastmen, but the amount of women in the army seemed weird to me. It doesn't offend me in the slightest, but it seemed a bit silly. Doesn't mean anything, really.

 

I'd say it is fair. He is complaining about possible activism in a game while actively trying to push his own view of what the fantasy game should like like on the creators. Those who criticize should be open to criticism, which is what I see happening here. I wouldn't say it has gotten ugly. His post was well written and I'd say the responses were fairly measured.


  • TrueNeutral, Bartimaeus, Raithe and 4 others like this

#17
rjshae

rjshae

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 4670 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Gender parity among party members != gender parity in society

 

PCs are an example of selection bias, but a positive one, in that the game survival requirements quite naturally selects candidates from the available pool who are capable of the task. They don't need to be representative of the population as a whole.



#18
Undecaf

Undecaf

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 722 posts
  • Location:Finland
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Haven't played Tyranny, but can't really blame people for noticing **** like this and underlining it as appearing... unpleasant. The understones and occasional outbursts - that everyone knows - in the entertainment industry being what they are today.



#19
smjjames

smjjames

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 894 posts
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Haven't played Tyranny, but can't really blame people for noticing **** like this and underlining it as appearing... unpleasant. The understones and occasional outbursts - that everyone knows - in the entertainment industry being what they are today.

 

The difference is that those liberal celebrities that you speak of usually push for said things. It didn't seem like they were overtly doing anything like the stuff that conservatives don't like. I'm liberal/progressive/left-leaning myself, so, maybe someone else would see it differently.



#20
injurai

injurai

    (9) Sorcerer

  • Members
  • 1265 posts
  • Location:Not the oceans
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Haven't played Tyranny, but can't really blame people for noticing **** like this and underlining it as appearing... unpleasant. The understones and occasional outbursts - that everyone knows - in the entertainment industry being what they are today.

 

Isn't Tyranny supposed to be an authoritarian hell hole anyways?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users