Even if very late, I just want to add myself to the party. I've bought the game for 5 € on a Steam sale last Christmass. I've not played it untill the last week since I was expecting a real bad game with more bugs than Vampire Redemption (reading the reviews and such).
Honestly, I feel guilty for having payed such a low price for that gem of a game. I would have liked to support the game at realease so maybe the franchise would have seen a deserved sequel (in a word where every game has a sequel, it's criminal that there won't be an AP2). Because the concept is great and the game has an heart.
It's really one of the most brilliant and fun action RPG I've played recently: personally, I'm enjoying it way way way more than TW2 for example: both games have flawed action gameplay and TW2 may look better and have better cinematic storytelling, but AP is way better in terms of RP and branching and even if flawed, unbalanced, maybe repetitive and a little bit too abstract, I find the gameplay adequate to support the story.
Talking about overrated (TW2) and underrated (AP)... honestly I really do not get why the review were so harsh... I'm playing the game and having fun with the various scenario and the interaction with the story and the various groups and charachters... I see the flaws but they aren't a gamebreaker for an RPG player: we have seen worst hybrids with worst stories.
So I keep asking myself: dear Mr. Jim Sterling, what's wrong with AP?
I know a review it's just an opinion and all of us have a different one, but you see how Mass Effect recieved a lot of good reviews when it has a tone of problems with the gameplay, a lot more than AP (and this one also have a lot of problems) and they were forgiven, and in AP they the defects were magnified.
Well, I do not agree... but avoiding to bash Bioware in every thread must go against the rules of the forum

. ME2 gameplay is very good and it's a great improvement over ME1. I've not seen all those gameplay problems you are talking about: the praise for its shooter/rpg mechanic were deserved. And ME2 is a better shooter/rpg hybrid than AP on every level and it's the first RPG hybrid I've played since the original Deus Ex that can rival action games on their terms without looking clunky.
Having said that, that's not a really fair comparison since AP focus more on stealth than gunplay.
I think that reviewers looked at AP not as an action RPG but as a shooter/action cinematic game with RPG elements. So, they concentrated on the technical shortcomings of the gameplay from that angle (balance, AI, lack of fluidity, lack of variety) and the clear lack of AAA production values, forgettin' that RPG player accepts a great deal of abstraction in term of gameplay and do not care about production values if the overall experience is fun and interesting.
Edited by meomao, 10 October 2011 - 02:21 AM.