Matt7895
Feb 22 2005, 12:09 PM
I think you'll all agree that what we need to see in the next KotOR, if there is one, is....HUTTS WITH LIGHTSABERS!
Come on, you gotta admit, that would be so cool, having a Hutt member of your party, or just seeing one in a cutscene firing out force lightning or choking someone.
NeverwinterKnight
Feb 22 2005, 12:18 PM
considering, apart from that blasphemy ridden pile of crap known as planet of twilight, hutts are supposed to be unable to feel the force, this idea would be completely dumb.
as dumb as that steaming pile of crap written by barbara hambly.
bob_the_kitty_hunter
Feb 22 2005, 12:20 PM
*gags* You whore! Hutts with lightsabers... *shudders* Maybe it's just me and my mind... but...
Darth Jebus
Feb 22 2005, 12:32 PM
What we really need is no more KOTOR 3 threads.
Azazel005
Feb 22 2005, 04:06 PM
QUOTE(NeverwinterKnight @ Feb 22 2005, 12:18 PM)
considering, apart from that blasphemy ridden pile of crap known as
planet of twilight, hutts are supposed to be unable to feel the force, this idea would be completely dumb.
as dumb as that steaming pile of crap written by barbara hambly.
Hahahaha, awwww that's what I was going to say....
DSLuke
Feb 23 2005, 05:46 AM
I would like to slice a hutt with my lightsaber......
anakins revenge
Feb 23 2005, 04:02 PM
i was actually lookin forward to this post...u disapoint me **** wad
Goodwood
Feb 23 2005, 04:50 PM
You say that with such...hatred...
I can feel the love in this thread...hey, I have an idea for KotOR III! Let's make a Force-power where you can have floating lightsabers to help you! For every upgrade to that power, you get another lightsaber to float!
Rambutaan
Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Chris Avellone
Feb 23 2005, 05:57 PM
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Ace
Feb 23 2005, 06:06 PM
Yowch, that stinks. Well that's the problem with dealing with other people's liscenses... *sigh*
Honestly though, some of the things that made it into KOTOR2 (such as the darker overtones of the story to small things like how sophisticated the various droid characters were in their self-motivations) I'm surprised were accepted.
Darth_Radnor
Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Chris Avellone
Feb 23 2005, 06:26 PM
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
Ulicus
Feb 23 2005, 06:51 PM
In KotOR 3 we need-
- A "where the hell did the "Darth" title come from? Did Revan just use it as an alias or was it some ancient title of the Sith Empire he resurrected?" explanation. Unless Lucas is hogging that for Episode III... the fiend.
- More T3-M4! I cannot believe that this game switched my attitude towards him from "complete indifference" to "absolutely adore the little guy".
- Oh and lightsabers. Tsch, obviously.
Goodwood
Feb 23 2005, 07:06 PM
I always thought that the Darth title was pretty much a "if you want it, grab it" deal. Meaning that anyone who had the cajones to declare themselves a "Darth" could do so.
And its too bad that Lucas axed that idea, because it would have been a great plot device to have a Hanharr be a Sith. But then, this game has already been called "unchallanging", and therefore having a giant walking carpet with Force powers and extreme hatred fueling him might make the game ridiculously easy (that's nothing against the devs, mind you) ...
Rambutaan
Feb 23 2005, 07:35 PM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 24 2005, 10:26 AM)
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
Yes I guess tying the story with what happens in other literature is one of the biggest challenges in developing a game based on a license. Software requirements elicitation must be a real pain on projects such as this one

. On one hand you want to make the story sound good but at the same time, you're restricted by keeping the story consistent with the rest of the universe...
213374U
Feb 24 2005, 07:58 AM
QUOTE(Goodwood @ Feb 24 2005, 04:06 AM)
I always thought that the Darth title was pretty much a "if you want it, grab it" deal. Meaning that anyone who had the cajones to declare themselves a "Darth" could do so.
That would indeed explain why we have so many 'Darths' in these boards.

"
ShadowPaladin V1.0
Feb 24 2005, 08:04 AM
Most of my second game was spent trying to influence Hanhar enough to awaken him.
He would have been seriously scary (like he wasnt already).
DarthLightsaber
Feb 24 2005, 08:08 AM
How about a droid in your party that could wield a lightsaber?
Jedi Master D Murda
Feb 24 2005, 09:14 AM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:26 PM)
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
I like when he crushes things in the EU.
kopolee13
Feb 24 2005, 05:06 PM
QUOTE
How about a droid in your party that could wield a lightsaber?
You want a General Grievous clone.
Ace
Feb 24 2005, 05:47 PM
HK-54s with organic components for force sensitivity
Yes this falls under the lamest idea ever category. Though such an idea, sentient droids attempting to create force-users, could be used as a reason why a droid planet would be involved in a war of belief against the true Sith.
jedipodo
Feb 25 2005, 05:43 PM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:26 PM)
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
This is discriminatory. So, according to GL, Wookies are considered being primitive animals...
Darth_Radnor
Feb 25 2005, 05:48 PM
QUOTE(jedipodo @ Feb 25 2005, 06:43 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:26 PM)
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
This is discriminatory. So, according to GL, Wookies are considered being primitive animals...
And contradicts himself about the Force touching all living things
KingofThieves
Feb 25 2005, 07:23 PM
These rules must definately suck when you're dealing with story-based action-oriented video games like this...
You've got 40 hours of content to fill, and you want your PC and NPC's to rock, but...
All of the amusing/interesting stuff you want to do with the Star Wars license is immediately put under the microscope. And if it seems even a little bit "poisoned" then fagedda 'bout it! It's gone like the chances of an NHL season in 2005. (w00t)
You can't "Cujo up" the ewoks. You can't have female Yoda party members which develop Miss Piggy-like crushes on the PC. You can't translate curses into Star Wars slang- like "Son of a bantha!" (still don't know how "intergalactic skank" made it into the first game, George's heart must've skipped a beat when he saw that one :ph34r: ).
Muad'Dib
Feb 25 2005, 08:22 PM
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 25 2005, 09:48 PM)
And contradicts himself about the Force touching all living things

I don't think so, as I understand it the Force is within all living thngs, but not all living things develop the ability to "use" the Force if you will. Just because a Wookie can't use the Force doesn't mean the Force isn't a part of it, remember that the Force is more of an analogy towards the essence of life, basically it is life. The Force is not the abilities the Jedi posses, they are in a sense more evolved thus can use and see other aspects of life others can't. There are plenty of races that can't use the Force in the way the Jedi can, I don't believe it makes a contradiction to the statement that the Force is within everything.
Just my opinion though.
Jedi Master Bumfluff
Feb 25 2005, 10:56 PM
QUOTE(kopolee13 @ Feb 25 2005, 12:06 PM)
QUOTE
How about a droid in your party that could wield a lightsaber?
You want a General Grievous clone.

How about a toilet???? Gee with all that running around they never seem to get a chance to 'be at one' with nature!

"
Plano Skywalker
Feb 26 2005, 06:33 AM
QUOTE(Muad'Dib @ Feb 26 2005, 12:22 AM)
I don't think so, as I understand it the Force is within all living thngs, but not all living things develop the ability to "use" the Force if you will. Just because a Wookie can't use the Force doesn't mean the Force isn't a part of it
right, it is the sense of "God" in the SW universe. Some people are priests but most are not...that kind of thing. Basically, if someone wanted a good idea of the Force, watch the movie Excalibur and listen to what Merlin says of "the dragon". It is basically the same thing. The Allthing...pantheism.
DSLuke
Feb 26 2005, 08:41 AM
QUOTE(Jedi Master Bumfluff @ Feb 26 2005, 07:56 AM)
QUOTE(kopolee13 @ Feb 25 2005, 12:06 PM)
QUOTE
How about a droid in your party that could wield a lightsaber?
You want a General Grievous clone.

How about a toilet???? Gee with all that running around they never seem to get a chance to 'be at one' with nature!

"
What kind of fuel do you think the hyperdrive is using??
Apophis Rex
Feb 26 2005, 04:13 PM
What we need in KOTOR III is the option to have an alien PC. I would love to play as a Trandoshan Sith since they are my favorite Star Wars species.
DarthReliguim
Feb 26 2005, 06:28 PM
Hutts with lightsabers are so much better.
Objulen
Mar 6 2005, 01:52 AM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE(Darth_Radnor @ Feb 23 2005, 06:14 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 06:57 PM)
QUOTE(Rambutaan @ Feb 23 2005, 05:26 PM)
What we really need in KOTOR 3 is:
(a) much less bugs,
(b) an explanation of what happened at the end of KOTOR 2 and
© a proper resolution to the series (unless there's going to be a KOTOR 4

)
Both wookiees and Hutts cannot (or are no longer allowed to) become Jedi, according to Lucas licensing (and despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe). We wanted to give Hanharr the option to become a Dark Jedi, but that was nixed as a result of that decision.
Isn't Chewbacca's nephew a Jedi in NJO?
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
I don't think that the RPG book of aliens backs this up either, but I don't own a copy so I can't say for certain.
A well. Lucas, both the person and the company, have lost my respect in several instances in the past several years.
Matt7895
Mar 6 2005, 11:04 AM
QUOTE(anakins revenge @ Feb 24 2005, 12:02 AM)
i was actually lookin forward to this post...u disapoint me **** wad
Thanks for the flame. I really do appreciate seeing geeks from halfway across the planet insulting me when they don't even know me.
KungFuFerret
Mar 6 2005, 11:18 AM
QUOTE
What kind of fuel do you think the hyperdrive is using??
That's easy to answer. Czerka corporation realized that could glean new profits from Tatooine by shipping out Bantha Podo for hyperdrive fuel.
lone_jedi_guardian
Mar 7 2005, 01:07 AM
QUOTE(DarthReliguim @ Feb 27 2005, 12:28 PM)
Hutts with lightsabers are so much better.
That is just strange, how is hutt meant to move anyways? is it meant to do the snail/slug act and push itself along with its tail *if* its in your party?
Matt7895
Mar 7 2005, 06:34 AM
QUOTE(lone_jedi_guardian @ Mar 7 2005, 09:07 AM)
QUOTE(DarthReliguim @ Feb 27 2005, 12:28 PM)
Hutts with lightsabers are so much better.
That is just strange, how is hutt meant to move anyways? is it meant to do the snail/slug act and push itself along with its tail *if* its in your party?
I was thinking of it using force speed to speed itself up. It's not a bad idea as force speed is often used in the game. Or, the Hutt could have a repulsorsled.
Michael Chu
Mar 7 2005, 08:53 PM
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 07:26 PM)
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
I think that means that Lowbacca is the galaxy's greatest con artist. :ph34r:
Darth Nuke
Mar 7 2005, 08:55 PM
QUOTE(Michael Chu @ Mar 7 2005, 08:53 PM)
QUOTE(Chris Avellone @ Feb 23 2005, 07:26 PM)
Yup, but that is the new rule - as I said, despite their presentation in the Expanded Universe. George Lucas said (either in or near the development of Episode II) that wookiees and Hutts could not be Jedi, so there you go. I have no idea where that leaves Lowbacca or that other wookiee (Master Tyvokka) who was Plo Koon's master.
I think that means that Lowbacca is the galaxy's greatest con artist. :ph34r:
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
213374U
Mar 7 2005, 09:05 PM
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:55 AM)
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
Not only that. It also means that from now on, no more Jedi wookies, EU or not. And of course no double-bladed lightsaber wielding slugs either.
Matt7895
Mar 8 2005, 06:55 AM
QUOTE(213374U @ Mar 8 2005, 05:05 AM)
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:55 AM)
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
Not only that. It also means that from now on, no more Jedi wookies, EU or not. And of course no double-bladed lightsaber wielding slugs either.
Actually, NOTHING can be added to the EU (books, games, or otherwise) without Lucas' consent. Every NJO meeting included George Lucas - he sets the rules. For the games, it is Lucasarts, who in turn get their orders from Lucasfilm. This is what Chris Avellone was talking about in the other thread.
So Lucas had to have authorised the character of Lowbacca to be Jedi. That means he has gone back on what he originally said, but he's a hypocrite anyway so there's nothing new there.
Darth Nuke
Mar 8 2005, 08:04 AM
QUOTE(213374U @ Mar 7 2005, 09:05 PM)
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:55 AM)
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
Not only that. It also means that from now on, no more Jedi wookies, EU or not. And of course no double-bladed lightsaber wielding slugs either.
Since Lowbacca is returning for the upcoming post NJO series, I don't it means that.
DeathScepter
Mar 8 2005, 09:36 AM
Kotor 3 wise I do think another Revan related Twist on his past while leaving many things left to the players' imagiation.
CeylanAmmar
Mar 8 2005, 09:39 AM
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 09:04 AM)
QUOTE(213374U @ Mar 7 2005, 09:05 PM)
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:55 AM)
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
Not only that. It also means that from now on, no more Jedi wookies, EU or not. And of course no double-bladed lightsaber wielding slugs either.
Since Lowbacca is returning for the upcoming post NJO series, I don't it means that.
What it means is hes going to be killed. NJO Spoilers!
*Lucas approved Anakin Solo and then after deciding one anakin was enough, had him killed. Course, it was one of the best death scenes ive ever read (Chewies was really great, so was Gandolf's).
Darth Nuke
Mar 8 2005, 10:01 AM
QUOTE(CeylanAmmar @ Mar 8 2005, 09:39 AM)
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 09:04 AM)
QUOTE(213374U @ Mar 7 2005, 09:05 PM)
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:55 AM)
Lucas doesn't like the idea, but remember Lucas doesn't always approve of everything the EU does. His continuity is the movies, though he approves and helps with the EU from time to time.
So wookies can be Jedi, and Hutts the same in the EU. Just don't exspect to see Hutt and Wookie Jedi in the movies.
Not only that. It also means that from now on, no more Jedi wookies, EU or not. And of course no double-bladed lightsaber wielding slugs either.
Since Lowbacca is returning for the upcoming post NJO series, I don't it means that.
What it means is hes going to be killed. NJO Spoilers!
*Lucas approved Anakin Solo and then after deciding one anakin was enough, had him killed. Course, it was one of the best death scenes ive ever read (Chewies was really great, so was Gandolf's). Actually your wrong. Lucas approved that Anakin couldn't be the hero, and didn't say anything about killing him off. That was a decision made by the Arthur.
Lowbacca isn't going to be killed. Lucas doesn't really care what the EU does, and will have no reason to kill off a Wookie Jedi. What Lucas means is that no Wookie or Hutt will be a Jedi in the films. However the EU is another question entirely.
AlanC9
Mar 8 2005, 12:05 PM
Did Lucas say why he doesn't want Wookie or Hutt Jedi? Seems kind of arbitrary.
Aegis
Mar 8 2005, 01:12 PM
Well obviously he's a specist.
DSLuke
Mar 8 2005, 01:13 PM
QUOTE(Aegis @ Mar 8 2005, 10:12 PM)
Well obviously he's a specist.
Racist is a more appropriate word I think. Correct me though if I'm wrong.
Aegis
Mar 8 2005, 01:16 PM
You're telling me that, for example, a hut and a human can breed?
...
Oh God, now there's a mental image I could've lived without.
213374U
Mar 8 2005, 02:03 PM
QUOTE(Darth Nuke @ Mar 8 2005, 05:04 PM)
Since Lowbacca is returning for the upcoming post NJO series, I don't it means that.
It means he won't allow any
new characters that conflict with his views. Hence, no
more Jedi wookies. Old ones, he can't suppress. He can't "delete" master Tyvokka, for instance, but don't expect to see someone like him anytime soon.
DSLuke
Mar 8 2005, 02:05 PM
What we really need in K3, is K3 to be announced.

"
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.